This document is page 3 of 15 from a legal filing (Document 103-2) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 23, 2020. It contains a 'Table of Authorities' listing two legal precedents: United States v. Chen and United States v. Orta. The document bears a Department of Justice footer (DOJ-OGR-00001188).
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where a speaker is arguing for bail for a defendant. The speaker cites several precedent cases (Esposito, Madoff, Dreier, Deutsch, Conway, and Mattis) to demonstrate that defendants in serious cases, including organized crime, massive financial fraud, and violent acts, have been granted release on bail conditions and have consistently appeared for trial. The argument aims to persuade the judge that release on conditions is appropriate in the current case as well.
This document is page 51 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. The text captures an oral argument by the defense counsel advocating for the defendant's release on bail by citing various legal precedents (Esposito, Madoff, Dreier, Deutsch, Conway, and Mattis). The argument highlights that defendants in cases involving organized crime, massive financial fraud, sex crimes, and even violence (Molotov cocktail) were previously granted bail under strict conditions.
This page is the third page of a legal filing (Document 123) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 23, 2020. It contains a 'Table of Authorities' listing two legal precedents: United States v. Chen (1992) and United States v. Orta (1985). The document bears a DOJ-OGR footer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity