[Redacted] (USANYS)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS)
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Cowley
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] (Sender)
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (AUSA)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA team from SDNY
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS) 1
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] Special Agent (FBI)
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK EPSTEIN
|
Meeting attempt |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Detective)
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (OPR)
|
Corresponded with |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-27 | N/A | Pre-Meeting US v Noel/Epstein FOIA | Unknown (likely virtual or ... | View |
| 2021-05-14 | N/A | Video conference interview (WebEx) with client. | Virtual (WebEx) | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Call in Epstein FOIA | Virtual/Phone Call | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Epstein FOIA Moot | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-11 | N/A | Call regarding Epstein FOIA | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein/Maxwell FOIA | Unknown (likely internal US... | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein/Maxwell FOIA request | Unknown (likely internal US... | View |
| 2020-10-20 | N/A | Meeting where spreadsheets regarding PAE cases were requested. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-09-01 | N/A | Scheduled trial (anticipated to be moved) | New York | View |
| 2020-08-06 | N/A | Email sent regarding OPR's draft report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter. | N/A (email communication) | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Scheduled call between OGA and USANYS personnel. | Phone | View |
| 2020-06-01 | N/A | Superseder in the Ukrainians case (upcoming) | New York | View |
| 2020-02-03 | N/A | USANYS employees coordinating a meeting to discuss follow-up questions received from the FCA rega... | USANYS Offices (implied) | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Conference call between The Bloom Firm and USANYS. | UberConference (Remote) | View |
| 2020-01-08 | N/A | Conference call regarding witness/attorney proffer. | UberConference (Remote) | View |
| 2019-11-07 | N/A | Mark Epstein Meeting (Declined) | 863 | View |
| 2019-09-17 | N/A | Meet on Epstein | Unknown (likely USANYS offi... | View |
| 2019-09-17 | N/A | Meeting titled 'Meet on Epstein' was accepted. | Likely USANYS Office | View |
| 2019-09-17 | N/A | Meeting titled 'Meet on Epstein' | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-10 | N/A | Meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-08-16 | N/A | Email discussion regarding SEC inquiry into Epstein's finances following his death. | View | |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | Update Conference Call - Epstein | Conference Call | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Meeting between Joe Nascimento and SDNY prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach, 600... | View |
| 2019-02-26 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein accepted by USANYS officials | Unknown (likely USANYS offi... | View |
| 2009-07-01 | N/A | Epstein meeting | Unknown | View |
EFTA00028772.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 14, 2020, between FBI agents (New York Field Office, Violent Crimes Task Force) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns an FBI 302 report and specifically discusses where an investigator named 'Mike' documented the phone number and the 'last call made by Epstein.' One official is also inquiring how a Lieutenant obtained a specific number.
EFTA00028571.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include the defense's inability to view certain files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), and technical disputes over metadata for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The prosecution explains that metadata for deleted files was not recovered and that certain images (nude and non-nude) were seized from CDs in Epstein's residences rather than extracted by CART from devices.
EFTA00028560.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated June 8, 2020. It details the drafting of a public statement by US Attorney Geoffrey Berman and his staff in response to a press release from Prince Andrew's legal counsel. The draft statement explicitly accuses Prince Andrew of falsely portraying himself as cooperative, stating that he has repeatedly declined interview requests regarding the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation.
EFTA00028044.pdf
This document is an email summary of a telephone call conducted on October 1, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a Special Agent (likely FBI) regarding discovery obligations in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The prosecutors requested the agent to search for any historical materials, notes, or computer files from the original Epstein investigation, which the agent joined in Miami around 2006/2007. The agent agreed to review old boxes from Palm Beach and his computer, noting he had previously provided binders containing victim information.
EFTA00028040.pdf
An internal email dated February 28, 2020, within the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding a media inquiry from Stephen Brown of the Daily News. The journalist sought guidance on an upcoming story about Epstein's co-conspirators, specifically asking about the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell and a redacted individual, the knowledge of massage recipients regarding underage girls, and the victim status of Epstein's girlfriend (name redacted).
EFTA00027581.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 27, 2021, initiated by attorney Stuart N. Kaplan to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Kaplan advises that he represents a retired FBI Special Agent who has been subpoenaed to testify in the *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* trial. Kaplan requests '1A notes' related to an FD-302 report to help his client prepare for testimony and discloses that his client was previously interviewed under oath by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
EFTA00027153.pdf
This document is an email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated August 15-16, 2019. The subject matter concerns 'MCC/Epstein - Prior 1001 Prosecution,' involving the research and sharing of case law (charging instruments from the Northern District of Texas and a Fifth Circuit opinion) relevant to the Epstein case. The thread includes professional legal exchange followed by casual banter between colleagues about being 'replaced' or 'besties.'
EFTA00027096.pdf
This document is an email chain dated August 12, 2019 (two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death), involving high-level officials from the ODAG, OIG, FBI, and USANYS. The correspondence concerns the urgent review of a draft letter intended for Congressional leaders regarding Epstein. The Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General asks for a quick turnaround on the review, incorporating comments from the previous night.
EFTA00026961.pdf
This document is an email chain dated January 8, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence discusses a recent conversation with opposing counsel resulting in an 'impasse in the negotiations.' The sender attaches a collection of defense submissions received to date and a memo regarding the case to facilitate a discussion on next steps.
EFTA00026837.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between attorneys at the Southern District of New York (USANYS) discussing a recent opinion by Judge Nathan in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The team arranges a weekend conference call to discuss the Judge's order requiring the government to confirm its position on evidence supporting Maxwell's interpretation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). One email also references a previous letter regarding discovery materials obtained from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL).
EFTA00026691.pdf
An internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated April 8, 2019. Staff members discuss a 'Brass meeting' requirement to submit forfeiture funding requests for cases with high investigative costs. Specific mention is made of the Epstein case, with a request for a 'super quick write up' to justify potential costs such as repeated travel to Florida and hiring experts. The document highlights the active preparation for the Epstein prosecution months before his July 2019 arrest.
EFTA00026446.pdf
An internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated April 8, 2019. The correspondence concerns a deadline for 'forfeiture funding requests' for the Jeffrey Epstein case. The sender requests a 'super quick Epstein write up' to justify significant investigative costs, specifically citing examples such as 'traveling to Florida a dozen times' and hiring experts. The thread includes attachments for FY20 Large Case Related Expenses.
EFTA00025442.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 2020 between officials from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), FBI, and OIG regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's detention at the MCC. An Assistant US Attorney mentions receiving BOP records via FOIA that included a sign posted in the SHU instructing staff to 'do your checks on Epstein.' The officials discuss whether they had previously been told about this sign during employee interviews, with FBI and OIG respondents stating they do not recall it.
EFTA00025223.pdf
This document is an email thread from June 2021 between the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG), the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), and attorney Montell Figgins. The correspondence coordinates an interview with a redacted subject (represented by Figgins) scheduled for June 17, 2021. The OIG agent discusses procedural requirements, including the use of 'Kalkines' warnings (compelled interview forms) versus voluntary forms, and the necessity of recording the interview.
EFTA00024996.pdf
This document is an email thread from January 2021 involving the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the transmission of 'Discovery Responses' filed on behalf of a redacted female client in a civil matter against Jeffrey Epstein. The sender, Chris R. Rodgers, confirms the attachment of these legal documents.
EFTA00024728.pdf
This document is an email dated September 14, 2020, sent to officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The sender requests a call to discuss a statement made by the mother of an unnamed individual during interviews. The email includes attachments referencing FBI interview forms (302s) dated January 8, 2020, and February 5, 2020.
EFTA00024008.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 17, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. It involves officials discussing a tip received from a defense attorney representing an inmate at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). The attorney had called the previous night with information, and the email seeks to connect her with the appropriate contacts at the Southern District of New York (SDNY).
EFTA00023225.pdf
An email update from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation dated September 3, 2019. It reports that interviews in Florida were postponed due to weather and details the results of attempting to interview two inmates housed across from Epstein's cell in the MCC; one declined and the other claimed to have slept through the incident.
EFTA00023034.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the US v. Maxwell trial (Case 20 Cr. 330). An Assistant US Attorney submits a motion to Judge Nathan's chambers to preclude the testimony of a redacted Doctor (expert witness). A subsequent internal email praises the brief as 'fantastic and very convincing' and thanks a colleague for their assistance.
EFTA00023025.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). They discuss an 'impasse in negotiations' with defense counsel and circulate defense submissions. A key email speculates that the defendant (referred to as 'She') 'may ask for a deferred prosecution,' suggesting a strategic legal maneuver by the defense to avoid trial or a standard guilty plea.
EFTA00022980.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and Blackfords LLP, legal counsel for Prince Andrew, in January 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. While Prince Andrew's lawyers claim he desires to cooperate, they delay the interview to handle 'preliminary issues,' leading to public tension when US Attorney Geoffrey Berman tells the press there has been 'zero co-operation,' provoking an angry rebuttal from Blackfords.
EFTA00022484.pdf
An April 2021 email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), FBI, and NYPD discussing the acquisition of travel records for Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a third redacted female individual. The correspondence confirms that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) records covering 1990-2021 were obtained for the redacted individual under two different last names. The emails also discuss waiting for records from the UK via 'ALAT' and coordinating an interview with the mother of the redacted individual.
EFTA00022143.pdf
This document is an internal email from a contractor at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated December 30, 2019. The sender is checking with colleagues about the appearance of watermarking on attached PDF documents, which appear to be redacted FBI 302 reports and interview notes.
EFTA00022084.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 10-11, 2020, within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). It discusses the completion and submission of a prosecution memo regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation and mentions that the team is working on a draft indictment. The emails coordinate a conference call for the following Wednesday to discuss the memo.
EFTA00021931.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 24, 2020, involving staff at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) discussing a press inquiry from Sunday Times reporter Dipesh Gadher. Gadher informed the office he intended to publish the name of 'Minor Victim 3' from the Ghislaine Maxwell indictment, believing her to be a specific British woman who had previously appeared on NBC Dateline. The USANYS staff discussed the ethical concerns of the reporter identifying the victim and successfully intervened via an off-the-record conversation to prevent the story from running at that time.
CD with Maxwell files
Request to grab a CD from the sender's desk on the 4th floor and upload contents to the Epstein share.
RE: CD with Maxwell files
Reporting that 4 of 5 folders uploaded, but folder '1B 1-14' is corrupted.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Accepting proposal with modifications. Requesting access to inspect 'excluded' items at Bronx warehouse. Discussing equipment for playing media and space requirements.
Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Asks if Markus is asking to expedite Court's consideration or shorten timeline for responding.
Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Replies 'Both'.
Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
States they do not oppose expediting consideration but DO oppose shortening the ten days to respond.
Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Agrees not to ask to shorten the 10 days if government doesn't ask for extension.
RE: Discovery Issues
Discussing logistics of sending a hard drive to MDC for Maxwell and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.
RE: Discovery Issues
Acknowledging receipt of previous email, will confer with vendor.
RE: Discovery Issues
Suggesting conference after vendor input. Plans to contact MDC regarding hard drive delivery to Maxwell.
FW: Discovery Issues
Forwarding defense counsel's email regarding discovery issues and asking for a time to discuss.
Discovery Issues
Detailed list of 7 issues regarding discovery production, including hard drive logistics, missing attachments, and metadata errors.
RE: Discovery Issues
Initial response regarding MDC drive restrictions, file conversion, and metadata explanations.
Discovery Issues
Listing 7 specific discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata discrepancies, and Bates number gaps.
RE: Discovery Issues
Initial responses to 7-point list. Discusses IT restrictions on drives to MDC, PDF conversions of excel files, and metadata on carved files.
Discovery Issues
List of 7 discovery issues: hard drive for Maxwell, unreadable disks, missing attachments (109k emails), metadata dates (July 2020) on 110k docs, CART numbers for 6500 photos, AV file metadata, and Bates number gap.
Re: Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney
I just called her, she hopefully will respond momentarily.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Introductory email stating Markus has been engaged to represent Maxwell in her appeal from the denial of her third bail application. Requests access to unredacted docket entries (4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169). Offers to enter protective order.
Delivery/Task order no. 15JA5421F00000068
Sending attached task order for CACI scanning/document management services. Note regarding performance period and invoicing instructions.
FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo
Sending draft to chiefs for expedited review. Notes language is based on past Epstein/Maxwell indictments.
RE: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo
Attached is a draft superseding indictment.
FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo
Asking what 'the Brass' wants regarding review/meeting. Requests draft indictment for review mindful of Monday Grand Jury date.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Stating the proposal is inadequate for defense. demanding laptops be allowed, all physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl (except massage tables), and questioning why 2,100 'highly confidential' images were not shared earlier.
Maxwell superseder prosecution memo
Requesting authorization to seek superseding indictment charging Maxwell with additional offenses. Grand Jury tentatively scheduled for March 29th.
RE: Jeffrey Epstein/FOIA matters
Confirming existence of only 2 FOIA cases: NY Times case and Radar Online case (17 Civ. 3956).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity