[Redacted] (USANYS)

Person
Mentions
135
Relationships
18
Events
25
Documents
66

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
18 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person [Redacted] (USANYS)
Business associate
4
4
View
person AUDREY STRAUSS
Business associate
2
2
View
person Cowley
Business associate
1
1
View
person [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor]
Business associate
1
1
View
organization [REDACTED]
Business associate
1
1
View
person Epstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
person [REDACTED] (Sender)
Professional collaborative
1
1
View
person [Redacted] (AUSA)
Business associate
1
1
View
person AUSA team from SDNY
Business associate
1
1
View
person David Oscar Markus
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
person [Redacted] (USANYS) 1
Business associate
1
1
View
person [Redacted] Special Agent (FBI)
Professional collaborative
1
1
View
person MARK EPSTEIN
Meeting attempt
1
1
View
person Jack Scarola
Legal representative
1
1
View
person [Redacted] (Detective)
Professional investigative
1
1
View
person [Redacted] (OPR)
Corresponded with
1
1
View
organization [REDACTED]
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Roberta Kaplan
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-06-27 N/A Pre-Meeting US v Noel/Epstein FOIA Unknown (likely virtual or ... View
2021-05-14 N/A Video conference interview (WebEx) with client. Virtual (WebEx) View
2021-04-13 N/A Call in Epstein FOIA Virtual/Phone Call View
2021-03-26 N/A Epstein FOIA Moot Unknown View
2021-03-11 N/A Call regarding Epstein FOIA Unknown View
2021-03-10 N/A Meeting regarding Epstein/Maxwell FOIA Unknown (likely internal US... View
2021-03-10 N/A Meeting regarding Epstein/Maxwell FOIA request Unknown (likely internal US... View
2020-10-20 N/A Meeting where spreadsheets regarding PAE cases were requested. Unknown View
2020-09-01 N/A Scheduled trial (anticipated to be moved) New York View
2020-08-06 N/A Email sent regarding OPR's draft report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter. N/A (email communication) View
2020-07-14 N/A Scheduled call between OGA and USANYS personnel. Phone View
2020-06-01 N/A Superseder in the Ukrainians case (upcoming) New York View
2020-02-03 N/A USANYS employees coordinating a meeting to discuss follow-up questions received from the FCA rega... USANYS Offices (implied) View
2020-01-23 N/A Conference call between The Bloom Firm and USANYS. UberConference (Remote) View
2020-01-08 N/A Conference call regarding witness/attorney proffer. UberConference (Remote) View
2019-11-07 N/A Mark Epstein Meeting (Declined) 863 View
2019-09-17 N/A Meet on Epstein Unknown (likely USANYS offi... View
2019-09-17 N/A Meeting titled 'Meet on Epstein' was accepted. Likely USANYS Office View
2019-09-17 N/A Meeting titled 'Meet on Epstein' Unknown View
2019-09-10 N/A Meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. Hilton West Palm Beach View
2019-08-16 N/A Email discussion regarding SEC inquiry into Epstein's finances following his death. Email View
2019-08-13 N/A Update Conference Call - Epstein Conference Call View
2019-07-12 N/A Meeting between Joe Nascimento and SDNY prosecutors. Hilton West Palm Beach, 600... View
2019-02-26 N/A Meeting regarding Epstein accepted by USANYS officials Unknown (likely USANYS offi... View
2009-07-01 N/A Epstein meeting Unknown View

EFTA00020450.pdf

This document is an email chain from August and September 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The primary official subject is an inquiry into the status of Jeffrey Epstein's 'finalized suicide reconstruction report,' which the USANYS had not yet received. The correspondence also touches on a prisoner transfer to Englewood, a 'QPDF case,' and personal health issues affecting an OIG employee.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00019603.pdf

This document is an email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated June 1, 2020. The correspondents discuss staffing and strategy for cases involving a 'wbtw scheme,' a 'possible PPE scam,' and a 'covid scheme.' Notably, one attorney mentions that 'Epstein/Rikers stuff' has been consuming their bandwidth, alongside work on a 'Ukrainians case' superseder.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00019063.pdf

An email chain from February 24, 2020, between attorney Bruce Barket and DOJ officials regarding a scheduling conflict for a status conference involving Mr. Tartaglione (likely Nicholas Tartaglione, Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate). Barket informs the prosecution that his request for a day off from a trial in the EDNY was denied, complicating his attendance at the Tartaglione conference where a 'Curcio issue' is to be addressed. The DOJ officials discuss consulting with 'Bobbi' before responding.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00018976.pdf

This document is an email chain from August 11, 2019 (the day after Epstein's death), sent by a DOJ OIG agent to FBI and USANYS officials. It details answers provided by a 'Lt. Doctor' regarding prison protocols, specifically requesting head count logs for 3:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. The email clarifies that Epstein's last cellmate was released on August 9, 2019, that there was no requirement for Epstein to have a cellmate at the time, and that Nicholas Tartaglione was a restricted contact due to a previous incident.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00018159.pdf

This document contains an email chain between the U.S. Attorney's Office (Virgin Islands and SDNY) and the U.S. Marshal Service regarding an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for violating International Megan's Law (IML). The USMS Senior Inspector reports that Epstein signed a duty to report travel form on March 15, 2019, but subsequently failed to report two international trips: one to Vienna, Austria on March 22, 2019 (accompanied by three female passengers), and one to Morocco on April 25, 2019. The officials express concern that leaking this information could hamper the ongoing investigation given Epstein's resources.

Email chain / investigative correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00018033.pdf

This document is a chain of email correspondence between attorney Joe Nascimento (of Ross Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC) and federal prosecutors (USANYS) regarding a cooperating witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence begins in July 2019, immediately following the service of a grand jury subpoena to Nascimento's client, who was previously represented by Nascimento's deceased partner, Alan Ross. The emails detail the scheduling of meetings (proffers) in West Palm Beach, confirm the client's cooperation, and include check-ins following major events like Hurricane Dorian and the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in July 2020.

Email correspondence / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00017842.pdf

This document is an internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 20, 2020. The correspondence concerns a letter regarding Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM') addressed to Judge Nathan about the unsealing of materials. One attorney asks another to 'use this version' of the document attached.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00017755.pdf

An email chain from August 13, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death (implied by the 'no open indictment' comment). Attorney Colleen Mullen coordinates a meeting for a victim/witness with prosecutors in New York and requests travel funding. Internally, USANYS staff discuss the logistical difficulty of funding witness travel to New York without an open indictment, suggesting investigators must travel to the witnesses instead.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00017058.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 12, 2019, between the FBI (NY office) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the processing of electronic evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion focuses on transferring processed emails to the USAO on a 1TB drive, the status of evidence from Epstein's NY residence (specifically 5-6 iMacs and 5 laptops), and the processing of a DVR system from 'the Island' (Little St. James) by FBI HQ. The USAO specifically inquires if the island materials are still being checked for 'CP images' (Child Pornography).

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00016311.pdf

This document is an email chain from September 2020 involving attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the search for a specific deposition transcript and video from December 4, 2009, in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein ([Redacted] vs Epstein). The court reporter and videography service confirmed they could not locate the records. Consequently, Scarola provided notes taken contemporaneously by his paralegal/investigator Mike Danchuk, noting that the witness described Epstein's pattern of recruitment and grooming.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00016304.pdf

This document is an email chain from September 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). They discuss the inability to locate the official transcript and video of a deposition from December 4, 2009, related to a case against Jeffrey Epstein. In the absence of the official record, Scarola provides contemporaneous notes taken by a paralegal, noting that they describe 'troubled young women' susceptible to Epstein's 'recruitment, grooming and victimization.'

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00015657.pdf

This document is an email chain between USANYS employees on August 10, 2019, the morning of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondents express shock and frustration at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MCC for allowing the suicide to occur, especially after a previous attempt two weeks prior. They simultaneously discuss legal strategies, specifically noting that while a general money judgment against the estate is likely impossible, civil forfeiture against specific properties might still be pursued depending on statutes of limitations.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00014715.pdf

An internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 23, 2021. A contractor forwarded a voicemail from an unidentified woman who claimed to have information about Ghislaine Maxwell and asserted she was a friend of George Soros. The contractor asked USANYS staff if they wished to follow up or if the caller should be sent crime reporting materials.

Email chain / internal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00013455.pdf

This document contains an email chain between the FBI (NYO and CID) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS/SDNY) from May 7-8, 2020. The most critical email outlines the status of the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. It states that SDNY is close to a final decision on charging her for complicity in Epstein's sex trafficking. The FBI confirms they believe she is living in Manchester by the Sea, MA, tracked via pen registers, cell site data, and Amazon delivery subpoenas. Traditional surveillance (pole cameras) was deemed unsuitable due to the secluded location, leading to requests for renewed digital tracking and mail covers.

Email chain / fbi communication
2025-12-25

EFTA00013243.pdf

Internal email correspondence from October 2020 between USANYS officials regarding discovery obligations. The team discusses a conversation with an original FBI agent from the Florida Epstein investigation, deciding not to re-collect emails between him and a specific AUSA (as OPR already collected them), but confirming the agent will send emails involving victims or witnesses and other potentially discoverable documents.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00009968.pdf

This document is an internal email thread from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated September 13, 2019. The correspondence discusses recent press coverage regarding the inadvertent FOIA release of USMS records (specifically USM 11s, noted as equivalent to FBI 302s) related to Jeffrey Epstein. The Chief of the Criminal Division reports speaking with the USMS Associate General Counsel to ensure the SDNY has the original materials to assess any potential harm to their ongoing investigation.

Email thread
2025-12-25
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
462
As Recipient
458
Total
920

CD with Maxwell files

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) [C...

Request to grab a CD from the sender's desk on the 4th floor and upload contents to the Epstein share.

Email
2021-04-05

RE: CD with Maxwell files

From: [Redacted] (USANYS) [C...
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Reporting that 4 of 5 folders uploaded, but folder '1B 1-14' is corrupted.

Email
2021-04-05

RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...

From: Laura Menninger
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Accepting proposal with modifications. Requesting access to inspect 'excluded' items at Bronx warehouse. Discussing equipment for playing media and space requirements.

Email
2021-04-02

Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: David Oscar Markus

Asks if Markus is asking to expedite Court's consideration or shorten timeline for responding.

Email
2021-04-01

Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell

From: David Oscar Markus
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Replies 'Both'.

Email
2021-04-01

Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: David Oscar Markus

States they do not oppose expediting consideration but DO oppose shortening the ten days to respond.

Email
2021-04-01

Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell

From: David Oscar Markus
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Agrees not to ask to shorten the 10 days if government doesn't ask for extension.

Email
2021-04-01

RE: Discovery Issues

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Discussing logistics of sending a hard drive to MDC for Maxwell and potential involvement of Judge Nathan.

Email
2021-03-30

RE: Discovery Issues

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Acknowledging receipt of previous email, will confer with vendor.

Email
2021-03-30

RE: Discovery Issues

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Suggesting conference after vendor input. Plans to contact MDC regarding hard drive delivery to Maxwell.

Email
2021-03-30

FW: Discovery Issues

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) [C...

Forwarding defense counsel's email regarding discovery issues and asking for a time to discuss.

Email
2021-03-29

Discovery Issues

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Detailed list of 7 issues regarding discovery production, including hard drive logistics, missing attachments, and metadata errors.

Email
2021-03-29

RE: Discovery Issues

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Initial response regarding MDC drive restrictions, file conversion, and metadata explanations.

Email
2021-03-29

Discovery Issues

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Listing 7 specific discovery issues including missing attachments, metadata discrepancies, and Bates number gaps.

Email
2021-03-29

RE: Discovery Issues

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Initial responses to 7-point list. Discusses IT restrictions on drives to MDC, PDF conversions of excel files, and metadata on carved files.

Email
2021-03-29

Discovery Issues

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

List of 7 discovery issues: hard drive for Maxwell, unreadable disks, missing attachments (109k emails), metadata dates (July 2020) on 110k docs, CART numbers for 6500 photos, AV file metadata, and Bates number gap.

Email
2021-03-29

Re: Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: [REDACTED]

I just called her, she hopefully will respond momentarily.

Email
2021-03-26

U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell

From: David Oscar Markus
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Introductory email stating Markus has been engaged to represent Maxwell in her appeal from the denial of her third bail application. Requests access to unredacted docket entries (4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169). Offers to enter protective order.

Email
2021-03-25

Delivery/Task order no. 15JA5421F00000068

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: [REDACTED]

Sending attached task order for CACI scanning/document management services. Note regarding performance period and invoicing instructions.

Email
2021-03-24

FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

From: [REDACTED]
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Sending draft to chiefs for expedited review. Notes language is based on past Epstein/Maxwell indictments.

Email
2021-03-24

RE: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

From: [REDACTED]
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Attached is a draft superseding indictment.

Email
2021-03-23

FW: Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: [REDACTED]

Asking what 'the Brass' wants regarding review/meeting. Requests draft indictment for review mindful of Monday Grand Jury date.

Email
2021-03-23

RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...

From: Laura Menninger
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Stating the proposal is inadequate for defense. demanding laptops be allowed, all physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl (except massage tables), and questioning why 2,100 'highly confidential' images were not shared earlier.

Email
2021-03-22

Maxwell superseder prosecution memo

From: [REDACTED]
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Requesting authorization to seek superseding indictment charging Maxwell with additional offenses. Grand Jury tentatively scheduled for March 29th.

Email
2021-03-19

RE: Jeffrey Epstein/FOIA matters

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: [REDACTED]

Confirming existence of only 2 FOIA cases: NY Times case and Radar Online case (17 Civ. 3956).

Email
2021-03-17

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity