| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS)
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Cowley
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] (Sender)
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (AUSA)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA team from SDNY
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS) 1
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] Special Agent (FBI)
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK EPSTEIN
|
Meeting attempt |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Detective)
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (OPR)
|
Corresponded with |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-27 | N/A | Pre-Meeting US v Noel/Epstein FOIA | Unknown (likely virtual or ... | View |
| 2021-05-14 | N/A | Video conference interview (WebEx) with client. | Virtual (WebEx) | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Call in Epstein FOIA | Virtual/Phone Call | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Epstein FOIA Moot | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-11 | N/A | Call regarding Epstein FOIA | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein/Maxwell FOIA | Unknown (likely internal US... | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein/Maxwell FOIA request | Unknown (likely internal US... | View |
| 2020-10-20 | N/A | Meeting where spreadsheets regarding PAE cases were requested. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-09-01 | N/A | Scheduled trial (anticipated to be moved) | New York | View |
| 2020-08-06 | N/A | Email sent regarding OPR's draft report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter. | N/A (email communication) | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Scheduled call between OGA and USANYS personnel. | Phone | View |
| 2020-06-01 | N/A | Superseder in the Ukrainians case (upcoming) | New York | View |
| 2020-02-03 | N/A | USANYS employees coordinating a meeting to discuss follow-up questions received from the FCA rega... | USANYS Offices (implied) | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Conference call between The Bloom Firm and USANYS. | UberConference (Remote) | View |
| 2020-01-08 | N/A | Conference call regarding witness/attorney proffer. | UberConference (Remote) | View |
| 2019-11-07 | N/A | Mark Epstein Meeting (Declined) | 863 | View |
| 2019-09-17 | N/A | Meet on Epstein | Unknown (likely USANYS offi... | View |
| 2019-09-17 | N/A | Meeting titled 'Meet on Epstein' was accepted. | Likely USANYS Office | View |
| 2019-09-17 | N/A | Meeting titled 'Meet on Epstein' | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-10 | N/A | Meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-08-16 | N/A | Email discussion regarding SEC inquiry into Epstein's finances following his death. | View | |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | Update Conference Call - Epstein | Conference Call | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Meeting between Joe Nascimento and SDNY prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach, 600... | View |
| 2019-02-26 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein accepted by USANYS officials | Unknown (likely USANYS offi... | View |
| 2009-07-01 | N/A | Epstein meeting | Unknown | View |
This document is an email chain from July 14, 2020, between FBI agents (New York Field Office, Violent Crimes Task Force) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns an FBI 302 report and specifically discusses where an investigator named 'Mike' documented the phone number and the 'last call made by Epstein.' One official is also inquiring how a Lieutenant obtained a specific number.
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include the defense's inability to view certain files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), and technical disputes over metadata for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The prosecution explains that metadata for deleted files was not recovered and that certain images (nude and non-nude) were seized from CDs in Epstein's residences rather than extracted by CART from devices.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated June 8, 2020. It details the drafting of a public statement by US Attorney Geoffrey Berman and his staff in response to a press release from Prince Andrew's legal counsel. The draft statement explicitly accuses Prince Andrew of falsely portraying himself as cooperative, stating that he has repeatedly declined interview requests regarding the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation.
This document is an email summary of a telephone call conducted on October 1, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a Special Agent (likely FBI) regarding discovery obligations in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The prosecutors requested the agent to search for any historical materials, notes, or computer files from the original Epstein investigation, which the agent joined in Miami around 2006/2007. The agent agreed to review old boxes from Palm Beach and his computer, noting he had previously provided binders containing victim information.
An internal email dated February 28, 2020, within the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding a media inquiry from Stephen Brown of the Daily News. The journalist sought guidance on an upcoming story about Epstein's co-conspirators, specifically asking about the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell and a redacted individual, the knowledge of massage recipients regarding underage girls, and the victim status of Epstein's girlfriend (name redacted).
This document is an email chain from September 27, 2021, initiated by attorney Stuart N. Kaplan to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Kaplan advises that he represents a retired FBI Special Agent who has been subpoenaed to testify in the *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* trial. Kaplan requests '1A notes' related to an FD-302 report to help his client prepare for testimony and discloses that his client was previously interviewed under oath by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
This document is an email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated August 15-16, 2019. The subject matter concerns 'MCC/Epstein - Prior 1001 Prosecution,' involving the research and sharing of case law (charging instruments from the Northern District of Texas and a Fifth Circuit opinion) relevant to the Epstein case. The thread includes professional legal exchange followed by casual banter between colleagues about being 'replaced' or 'besties.'
This document is an email chain dated August 12, 2019 (two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death), involving high-level officials from the ODAG, OIG, FBI, and USANYS. The correspondence concerns the urgent review of a draft letter intended for Congressional leaders regarding Epstein. The Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General asks for a quick turnaround on the review, incorporating comments from the previous night.
This document is an email chain dated January 8, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence discusses a recent conversation with opposing counsel resulting in an 'impasse in the negotiations.' The sender attaches a collection of defense submissions received to date and a memo regarding the case to facilitate a discussion on next steps.
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between attorneys at the Southern District of New York (USANYS) discussing a recent opinion by Judge Nathan in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The team arranges a weekend conference call to discuss the Judge's order requiring the government to confirm its position on evidence supporting Maxwell's interpretation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). One email also references a previous letter regarding discovery materials obtained from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL).
An internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated April 8, 2019. Staff members discuss a 'Brass meeting' requirement to submit forfeiture funding requests for cases with high investigative costs. Specific mention is made of the Epstein case, with a request for a 'super quick write up' to justify potential costs such as repeated travel to Florida and hiring experts. The document highlights the active preparation for the Epstein prosecution months before his July 2019 arrest.
An internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated April 8, 2019. The correspondence concerns a deadline for 'forfeiture funding requests' for the Jeffrey Epstein case. The sender requests a 'super quick Epstein write up' to justify significant investigative costs, specifically citing examples such as 'traveling to Florida a dozen times' and hiring experts. The thread includes attachments for FY20 Large Case Related Expenses.
This document is an email thread from July 2020 between officials from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), FBI, and OIG regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's detention at the MCC. An Assistant US Attorney mentions receiving BOP records via FOIA that included a sign posted in the SHU instructing staff to 'do your checks on Epstein.' The officials discuss whether they had previously been told about this sign during employee interviews, with FBI and OIG respondents stating they do not recall it.
This document is an email thread from June 2021 between the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG), the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), and attorney Montell Figgins. The correspondence coordinates an interview with a redacted subject (represented by Figgins) scheduled for June 17, 2021. The OIG agent discusses procedural requirements, including the use of 'Kalkines' warnings (compelled interview forms) versus voluntary forms, and the necessity of recording the interview.
This document is an email thread from January 2021 involving the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the transmission of 'Discovery Responses' filed on behalf of a redacted female client in a civil matter against Jeffrey Epstein. The sender, Chris R. Rodgers, confirms the attachment of these legal documents.
This document is an email dated September 14, 2020, sent to officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The sender requests a call to discuss a statement made by the mother of an unnamed individual during interviews. The email includes attachments referencing FBI interview forms (302s) dated January 8, 2020, and February 5, 2020.
This document is an email chain from August 17, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. It involves officials discussing a tip received from a defense attorney representing an inmate at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). The attorney had called the previous night with information, and the email seeks to connect her with the appropriate contacts at the Southern District of New York (SDNY).
An email update from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation dated September 3, 2019. It reports that interviews in Florida were postponed due to weather and details the results of attempting to interview two inmates housed across from Epstein's cell in the MCC; one declined and the other claimed to have slept through the incident.
This document contains an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the US v. Maxwell trial (Case 20 Cr. 330). An Assistant US Attorney submits a motion to Judge Nathan's chambers to preclude the testimony of a redacted Doctor (expert witness). A subsequent internal email praises the brief as 'fantastic and very convincing' and thanks a colleague for their assistance.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). They discuss an 'impasse in negotiations' with defense counsel and circulate defense submissions. A key email speculates that the defendant (referred to as 'She') 'may ask for a deferred prosecution,' suggesting a strategic legal maneuver by the defense to avoid trial or a standard guilty plea.
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and Blackfords LLP, legal counsel for Prince Andrew, in January 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. While Prince Andrew's lawyers claim he desires to cooperate, they delay the interview to handle 'preliminary issues,' leading to public tension when US Attorney Geoffrey Berman tells the press there has been 'zero co-operation,' provoking an angry rebuttal from Blackfords.
An April 2021 email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), FBI, and NYPD discussing the acquisition of travel records for Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a third redacted female individual. The correspondence confirms that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) records covering 1990-2021 were obtained for the redacted individual under two different last names. The emails also discuss waiting for records from the UK via 'ALAT' and coordinating an interview with the mother of the redacted individual.
This document is an internal email from a contractor at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated December 30, 2019. The sender is checking with colleagues about the appearance of watermarking on attached PDF documents, which appear to be redacted FBI 302 reports and interview notes.
This document is an email chain from April 10-11, 2020, within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). It discusses the completion and submission of a prosecution memo regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation and mentions that the team is working on a draft indictment. The emails coordinate a conference call for the following Wednesday to discuss the memo.
This document is an email chain from July 24, 2020, involving staff at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) discussing a press inquiry from Sunday Times reporter Dipesh Gadher. Gadher informed the office he intended to publish the name of 'Minor Victim 3' from the Ghislaine Maxwell indictment, believing her to be a specific British woman who had previously appeared on NBC Dateline. The USANYS staff discussed the ethical concerns of the reporter identifying the victim and successfully intervened via an off-the-record conversation to prevent the story from running at that time.
Clarification: 'I meant I *won't share further!' and wishing luck.
Discussing media inquiries regarding the Law360 article. Sender mentions Bloomberg has been contacting them and they are ignoring it.
Discussion regarding a forwarded Law360 article about SDNY prosecutor candidates. One participant mentions ignoring inquiries from Bloomberg.
Confirming delivery of a drive for loading files, pending snow storm conditions.
Providing FTP link for discovery materials and requesting missing Bates ranges.
Internal discussion regarding uploading materials and file sizes (15GB).
Forwarding draft with 'My edits'. Attachment included.
Apologizing for lateness; stating a letter is owed to the Court regarding defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions; attaching draft for review.
Sender provides an updated version of the PCU case tracker attachment. Notes that everyone except one redacted individual has provided case details.
Detailed response to 9 discovery points raised by defense, including hard drive access, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and metadata issues.
Quotes identifying 'a different resolution' (likely referring to a specific legal strategy or plea deal term).
States: 'She may ask for a deferred prosecution.'
Agrees with previous email: 'That is what I think.'
Transmission of an attachment related to a Draft Supplemental Declaration for the case Times v BOP 20cv833.
Counsel, Please see attached. Best, [Redacted]
States that they appear to be at an impasse in negotiations with defense attorneys. Attaches full collection of defense submissions received to date and a recent team memo.
Thank you.
Letter outlining 9 specific discovery issues/deficiencies including missing flight logs pages, unreadable CDs at MDC, and request for unredacted FBI reports.
Formal letter raising 8 discovery issues + 1 media issue. Key points: Hard drive delays preventing Maxwell's defense prep, unredacted FBI report request, missing Rodgers flight logs (pages 1-27), metadata gaps, and inquiry about unsealed affidavit.
Forwarding the complaint email with 'FYI'.
Proposed letter and declarations from associate wardens at MDC and MCC for review. GC and PC chiefs have signed off. Urgency due to MCC/MDC contacts leaving early before 1/1/30 and need to finalize declarations ASAP.
Apology for email delay due to Outlook freezing. States that the declaration looked good with minor typos fixed and notes a couple of questions/comments on an attached declaration.
Thanks [REDACTED]! We've incorporated your edits. As for you question about the "under investigation language," the investigation related to the contraband cellphone is a matter of public record. As for the [REDACTED], we've consulted with the MCC and softened that language to the effect that Rivera was in the SHU for a disciplinary issue, without referencing the specifics or the fact that [REDACTED].
Apology for delay, email was in outbox. Refers to previous email from Dec 31, 2020, 3:00 PM where edits were incorporated and question about 'under investigation language' for contraband cellphone was addressed, stating Rivera was in SHU for disciplinary issue.
Notifying that outlook is restarting.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity