[Redacted] (USANYS)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS)
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Cowley
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] (Sender)
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (AUSA)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA team from SDNY
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David Oscar Markus
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS) 1
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] Special Agent (FBI)
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK EPSTEIN
|
Meeting attempt |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Detective)
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (OPR)
|
Corresponded with |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-27 | N/A | Pre-Meeting US v Noel/Epstein FOIA | Unknown (likely virtual or ... | View |
| 2021-05-14 | N/A | Video conference interview (WebEx) with client. | Virtual (WebEx) | View |
| 2021-04-13 | N/A | Call in Epstein FOIA | Virtual/Phone Call | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Epstein FOIA Moot | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-11 | N/A | Call regarding Epstein FOIA | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein/Maxwell FOIA | Unknown (likely internal US... | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein/Maxwell FOIA request | Unknown (likely internal US... | View |
| 2020-10-20 | N/A | Meeting where spreadsheets regarding PAE cases were requested. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-09-01 | N/A | Scheduled trial (anticipated to be moved) | New York | View |
| 2020-08-06 | N/A | Email sent regarding OPR's draft report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter. | N/A (email communication) | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Scheduled call between OGA and USANYS personnel. | Phone | View |
| 2020-06-01 | N/A | Superseder in the Ukrainians case (upcoming) | New York | View |
| 2020-02-03 | N/A | USANYS employees coordinating a meeting to discuss follow-up questions received from the FCA rega... | USANYS Offices (implied) | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Conference call between The Bloom Firm and USANYS. | UberConference (Remote) | View |
| 2020-01-08 | N/A | Conference call regarding witness/attorney proffer. | UberConference (Remote) | View |
| 2019-11-07 | N/A | Mark Epstein Meeting (Declined) | 863 | View |
| 2019-09-17 | N/A | Meet on Epstein | Unknown (likely USANYS offi... | View |
| 2019-09-17 | N/A | Meeting titled 'Meet on Epstein' was accepted. | Likely USANYS Office | View |
| 2019-09-17 | N/A | Meeting titled 'Meet on Epstein' | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-10 | N/A | Meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-08-16 | N/A | Email discussion regarding SEC inquiry into Epstein's finances following his death. | View | |
| 2019-08-13 | N/A | Update Conference Call - Epstein | Conference Call | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Meeting between Joe Nascimento and SDNY prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach, 600... | View |
| 2019-02-26 | N/A | Meeting regarding Epstein accepted by USANYS officials | Unknown (likely USANYS offi... | View |
| 2009-07-01 | N/A | Epstein meeting | Unknown | View |
EFTA00020450.pdf
This document is an email chain from August and September 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The primary official subject is an inquiry into the status of Jeffrey Epstein's 'finalized suicide reconstruction report,' which the USANYS had not yet received. The correspondence also touches on a prisoner transfer to Englewood, a 'QPDF case,' and personal health issues affecting an OIG employee.
EFTA00019603.pdf
This document is an email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated June 1, 2020. The correspondents discuss staffing and strategy for cases involving a 'wbtw scheme,' a 'possible PPE scam,' and a 'covid scheme.' Notably, one attorney mentions that 'Epstein/Rikers stuff' has been consuming their bandwidth, alongside work on a 'Ukrainians case' superseder.
EFTA00019063.pdf
An email chain from February 24, 2020, between attorney Bruce Barket and DOJ officials regarding a scheduling conflict for a status conference involving Mr. Tartaglione (likely Nicholas Tartaglione, Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate). Barket informs the prosecution that his request for a day off from a trial in the EDNY was denied, complicating his attendance at the Tartaglione conference where a 'Curcio issue' is to be addressed. The DOJ officials discuss consulting with 'Bobbi' before responding.
EFTA00018976.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2019 (the day after Epstein's death), sent by a DOJ OIG agent to FBI and USANYS officials. It details answers provided by a 'Lt. Doctor' regarding prison protocols, specifically requesting head count logs for 3:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. The email clarifies that Epstein's last cellmate was released on August 9, 2019, that there was no requirement for Epstein to have a cellmate at the time, and that Nicholas Tartaglione was a restricted contact due to a previous incident.
EFTA00018159.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the U.S. Attorney's Office (Virgin Islands and SDNY) and the U.S. Marshal Service regarding an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for violating International Megan's Law (IML). The USMS Senior Inspector reports that Epstein signed a duty to report travel form on March 15, 2019, but subsequently failed to report two international trips: one to Vienna, Austria on March 22, 2019 (accompanied by three female passengers), and one to Morocco on April 25, 2019. The officials express concern that leaking this information could hamper the ongoing investigation given Epstein's resources.
EFTA00018033.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between attorney Joe Nascimento (of Ross Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC) and federal prosecutors (USANYS) regarding a cooperating witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence begins in July 2019, immediately following the service of a grand jury subpoena to Nascimento's client, who was previously represented by Nascimento's deceased partner, Alan Ross. The emails detail the scheduling of meetings (proffers) in West Palm Beach, confirm the client's cooperation, and include check-ins following major events like Hurricane Dorian and the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in July 2020.
EFTA00017842.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 20, 2020. The correspondence concerns a letter regarding Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM') addressed to Judge Nathan about the unsealing of materials. One attorney asks another to 'use this version' of the document attached.
EFTA00017755.pdf
An email chain from August 13, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death (implied by the 'no open indictment' comment). Attorney Colleen Mullen coordinates a meeting for a victim/witness with prosecutors in New York and requests travel funding. Internally, USANYS staff discuss the logistical difficulty of funding witness travel to New York without an open indictment, suggesting investigators must travel to the witnesses instead.
EFTA00017058.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 12, 2019, between the FBI (NY office) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the processing of electronic evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion focuses on transferring processed emails to the USAO on a 1TB drive, the status of evidence from Epstein's NY residence (specifically 5-6 iMacs and 5 laptops), and the processing of a DVR system from 'the Island' (Little St. James) by FBI HQ. The USAO specifically inquires if the island materials are still being checked for 'CP images' (Child Pornography).
EFTA00016311.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 involving attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the search for a specific deposition transcript and video from December 4, 2009, in a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein ([Redacted] vs Epstein). The court reporter and videography service confirmed they could not locate the records. Consequently, Scarola provided notes taken contemporaneously by his paralegal/investigator Mike Danchuk, noting that the witness described Epstein's pattern of recruitment and grooming.
EFTA00016304.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 between attorney Jack Scarola and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). They discuss the inability to locate the official transcript and video of a deposition from December 4, 2009, related to a case against Jeffrey Epstein. In the absence of the official record, Scarola provides contemporaneous notes taken by a paralegal, noting that they describe 'troubled young women' susceptible to Epstein's 'recruitment, grooming and victimization.'
EFTA00015657.pdf
This document is an email chain between USANYS employees on August 10, 2019, the morning of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondents express shock and frustration at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MCC for allowing the suicide to occur, especially after a previous attempt two weeks prior. They simultaneously discuss legal strategies, specifically noting that while a general money judgment against the estate is likely impossible, civil forfeiture against specific properties might still be pursued depending on statutes of limitations.
EFTA00014715.pdf
An internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 23, 2021. A contractor forwarded a voicemail from an unidentified woman who claimed to have information about Ghislaine Maxwell and asserted she was a friend of George Soros. The contractor asked USANYS staff if they wished to follow up or if the caller should be sent crime reporting materials.
EFTA00013455.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the FBI (NYO and CID) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS/SDNY) from May 7-8, 2020. The most critical email outlines the status of the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. It states that SDNY is close to a final decision on charging her for complicity in Epstein's sex trafficking. The FBI confirms they believe she is living in Manchester by the Sea, MA, tracked via pen registers, cell site data, and Amazon delivery subpoenas. Traditional surveillance (pole cameras) was deemed unsuitable due to the secluded location, leading to requests for renewed digital tracking and mail covers.
EFTA00013243.pdf
Internal email correspondence from October 2020 between USANYS officials regarding discovery obligations. The team discusses a conversation with an original FBI agent from the Florida Epstein investigation, deciding not to re-collect emails between him and a specific AUSA (as OPR already collected them), but confirming the agent will send emails involving victims or witnesses and other potentially discoverable documents.
EFTA00009968.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated September 13, 2019. The correspondence discusses recent press coverage regarding the inadvertent FOIA release of USMS records (specifically USM 11s, noted as equivalent to FBI 302s) related to Jeffrey Epstein. The Chief of the Criminal Division reports speaking with the USMS Associate General Counsel to ensure the SDNY has the original materials to assess any potential harm to their ongoing investigation.
Re: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Confirming a response was sent hours ago.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Asking to bump the filing up the list because BOP contacts want to leave for the holiday.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Submitting proposed letter and declarations from associate wardens at MDC and MCC for review. Noting GC and PC chiefs signed off.
FW: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Forwarding draft declaration and letter regarding the Maxwell/Rivera disparity issue.
FW: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Forwarded email header containing metadata about an embedded message regarding legal counsel and discovery access disparities.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Finalizing the declaration filing before the deadline; noting BOP contacts want to leave early for the holiday.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Details the differing accommodations for Maxwell (MDC) and Rivera (MCC). Explains that differences are due to case specifics, lawyer requests, and individual housing circumstances. Maxwell has more discovery, unique protective custody, sole access to computer/phone for 15 hours/day. Rivera is in general population, shares VTC room with ~80 inmates. MCC now leaving laptop with Rivera all day. Providing Rivera 15 hours VTC access would compromise other inmates' access. MCC will try to accommodate further requests.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Asks who is signing the declaration for BOP.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Mentions [REDACTED], Associate Warden at MCC, and possibility of a short declaration from MDC regarding Maxwell's accommodations. [REDACTED] is working on this.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Discussing who the Associate Warden at MCC is and potential short declaration from MDC regarding Maxwell's accommodations.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Drafting response explaining that disparities result from specific circumstances and housing. Noting Maxwell has 13 hours/day laptop access vs Rivera's 3 hours (though MCC is now extending Rivera's access).
FW: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Circulating latest draft of letter and declaration explaining the disparity in accommodations.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Drafting the response: Maxwell has more discovery material and is in protective custody (isolation), allowing her sole access to equipment, whereas Rivera is in general population sharing with 80 others.
Bill of Particulars Request
I hope you all had a good holiday. Please see attached a request for a Bill of Particulars.
Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine...
Initial email bringing attention to the issue of disparities in counsel and discovery access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera, as raised by Judge Engelmayer in United States v. Rivera et al. Explains Rivera's case, detention, new counsel, and Judge Engelmayer's frustration with MCC's treatment. Details existing court orders for Rivera (laptop access 3 hours/day, videoconference 4 hours/week). Notes defense counsel's comparison to Maxwell's 'strikingly different and far superior' accommodations at MDC. Judge Engelmayer asked for a BOP declaration to explain the rationale. Provides a table comparing Maxwell's and Rivera's accommodations for electronic discovery, counsel visits, and weekend legal calls. Notes declaration is due by Dec 31 and suggests a call to discuss.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Asks for updates on the substance of the draft declaration before 12/31 submission and how much of the disparity is due to MCC/MDC differences and housing situations.
RE: Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghisl...
Detailed summary of Judge Engelmayer's concerns regarding the disparity in accommodations between Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera, including a comparison table of hours allowed for discovery review and legal calls.
Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine...
Alerting team that Judge Engelmayer requested a declaration explaining why Maxwell gets superior access compared to Rivera.
RE: Extradition question
I got caught up in a bunch of stuff on Friday. Do you have additional questions or are you good to go?
RE: Extradition question
Thanks. I wanted to confirm that this link contains the current extradition act: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/41. I know you had sent a PDF of the act, but given the volume of the document, I wanted to include a link instead should the Court choose to take a look. We will let you know if we have any additional questions as we are finalizing the document. Thanks again for all of your help – we really appreciate it.
RE: Extradition question
Thanks so much. If you could send along those provisions or any additional thoughts, that would be much appreciated. I also have a few follow up questions. Would you have time for a call sometime Friday, please? Thanks again for your assistance.
RE: Extradition question
Let me know when you get in today and I’ll give you a call. I’m around today until around noon your time with one call at 10:30 -11.
RE: Extradition question
Thanks. Would 10 am work? I’m at 646-612-0825.
Emailing: WOLSEN_20201211131426410_DRAFT.pdf
Email transmitting an attachment named WOLSEN_20201211131426410_DRAFT.pdf
Re: Maxwell Finances
Suggesting a call with Lara and others.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity