| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | BOP guard responded to SHU for body alert; Epstein found unresponsive; CPR administered. | MCC SHU | View |
| N/A | N/A | Police collected a micro-cassette tape containing a statement from Alfredo Rodriguez as evidence ... | Town of Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's guilty plea | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Inquiries regarding Inmate Epstein's suicide attempt by USMS and media | Correctional Facility (Impl... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell realized marriage to Epstein was never going to happen. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Return to custody | Correctional Facility | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution by the United States Attorney, in favor of prosecution by the ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein to plead guilty (nolo contendere) to an Information filed by the State Attorney's Office ... | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Joint recommendation by Epstein and the State Attorney's Office for Epstein to serve at least two... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Possible mediation involving Epstein and Scott Link. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR investigation into Epstein's status as a cooperating witness or intelligence asset. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta agreed to end the federal investigation through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), demonst... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | JPMorgan terminated Epstein as a client | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Black book sting investigation | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Psychological Observation Status | Correctional Facility (Impl... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Media reports suggested Epstein was released early from state incarceration due to assisting in a... | Eastern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta's decision to permit Epstein to resolve federal investigation by pleading guilty to state ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OIG Investigation regarding Epstein's death | Unknown (implied prison/det... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual Abuse | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Period during which the defendant and Epstein committed crimes together. | Epstein's properties | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court of appeals affirmed the district court's decision, rejecting petitioner's contention that E... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Petitioner moved to dismiss indictment arguing Epstein's NPA barred her prosecution as a coconspi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged massages of Epstein by Accuser-3 | England | View |
This legal document, filed on April 29, 2022, details post-conviction proceedings in the case of United States v. Maxwell. The Defendant, convicted on three conspiracy counts related to a conspiracy with Epstein, argued the counts were multiplicitous and violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. The Government conceded that Counts One and Three were multiplicitous, and the Court agreed not to impose judgment on Count One and also granted the Defendant's motion to not enter judgment on Count Five, finding it multiplicitous with Count Three.
This Reuters news article reports on the perspectives of jurors from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Juror Scotty David describes how another juror, Carolyn, was influenced by a fellow juror's story of growing up in a similar socioeconomic background, leading her to believe girls in her neighborhood could have been victimized by people like Epstein and Maxwell. David also states his own conviction that Maxwell was complicit and not merely a scapegoat for Epstein.
This document is a news article from DailyMail.Online detailing an interview with 'Scotty,' a juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty discusses the jury's deliberations, their negative reaction to the defense's aggressive tactics towards victims, and the overwhelming complexity of the 80-page jury instructions. A sidebar article reports on a separate legal issue, describing a 'brutal' court hearing for Prince Andrew in New York for a sexual abuse lawsuit, where a judge appeared unreceptive to his lawyers' arguments to dismiss the case.
This legal document excerpt details a juror's, named David, perspective on the acquittal of Maxwell on a specific charge ('count two') involving an accuser named Jane. David explains that while Jane's story was corroborated by flight logs and Epstein's 'little black book', the jury ultimately found insufficient direct evidence to prove Maxwell had 'enticed' Jane to travel, which was required for a conviction on that charge. The decision was based on a lack of evidence for that specific action, not on a disbelief of the victim.
This document is the signature page of a Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007. It is signed by Gerald Lefcourt on behalf of his client, Jeffrey Epstein, and confirms Epstein's understanding and agreement to the terms. The agreement is with the U.S. Attorney's office, represented by R. Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafana.
This document is a page from a plea agreement involving Epstein, detailing sentencing timelines and conditions regarding 'gain time' during incarceration in Florida. It outlines confidentiality expectations and stipulates that if Epstein fulfills the agreement, the United States will not prosecute named co-conspirators and will suspend federal Grand Jury investigations.
This document is a page from a plea agreement outlining the terms under which Epstein will plead guilty to charges in Palm Beach County, Florida. He agrees to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution and another offense requiring sex offender registration, in exchange for a recommended 30-month sentence divided into 18 months of county jail and 12 months of community control. The agreement is contingent on a judge's approval and also stipulates that Epstein will provide documents to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
This page is part of a legal agreement detailing the terms under which the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, R. Alexander Acosta, agrees to defer federal prosecution of Epstein. The deferral is in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, contingent upon Epstein's compliance with the agreement's conditions. The document also outlines the procedure for initiating federal prosecution, including a notice period, should Epstein violate the terms.
This legal document is a court order from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 16, 2021, denying a request by the defendant, Maxwell, for an evidentiary hearing. The Court rules that a hearing is unnecessary because the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in question is clear and in writing, unlike cases involving ambiguous oral agreements. The Court also orders the Government to confirm within one week its disclosure of any evidence that might support Maxwell's interpretation of the NPA.
This document is a page from a legal indictment, filed on March 29, 2021, detailing charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that between 2001 and 2004, Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or his employees arranged for "Minor Victim-4" to provide massages for Epstein. The page also outlines COUNT SIX, charging Maxwell with Sex Trafficking of a Minor for recruiting and transporting a person under 18 for commercial sex acts in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere during the same period.
This legal document, filed on March 29, 2021, outlines overt acts in a conspiracy case against Epstein and Maxwell. It alleges that between 2001 and 2004, they recruited a minor, referred to as Minor Victim-4, for sex acts with Epstein at his Palm Beach residence, paid her cash, and encouraged her to recruit other girls. The document also states that gifts were sent from the Southern District of New York to the victim's residence by Epstein's employees, including Maxwell.
This document is a page from a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details allegations of Maxwell's involvement in recruiting and facilitating the sexual abuse of minors by Epstein, specifically mentioning Minor Victim-3 in London (1994-1995) and Minor Victim-4 from Florida (2001-2002). The page also outlines Count Four of the indictment, charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.
This document is page 13 of a legal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details several allegations of Maxwell's involvement in the sexual abuse of minors, including arranging for victims to provide massages to Epstein and travel with him between 1994 and 2002. The page outlines specific incidents involving three unnamed minor victims in locations such as New Mexico, London, and Florida, and introduces COUNT TWO: "Enticement of a Minor to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts."
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely an indictment, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines a conspiracy between Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and others to entice individuals across state lines for illegal sexual activity. The document details specific overt acts, including Maxwell's participation in group sexual encounters with a minor victim in New York and Florida between 1994 and 1997, and the enticement of that same victim to travel for sexual abuse in 1996.
This legal document, part of a criminal case, outlines allegations against MAXWELL for grooming and recruiting several minors for sexual abuse by Epstein. It details specific instances involving 'Minor Victim-2' in New Mexico and 'Minor Victim-3' in London between 1994-1995, stating MAXWELL was aware of the abuse. The document also mentions 'Minor Victim-4' was recruited and paid by Epstein or his associates for sexualized massages.
This legal document outlines the alleged methods used by MAXWELL to facilitate Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minor victims. It details how MAXWELL would groom victims through outings, normalize sexual abuse by discussing sexual topics and being present during abusive acts, and use her presence as an adult woman to put victims at ease. The document also states that MAXWELL encouraged victims to provide sexualized massages to Epstein, which resulted in abuse, and to accept financial offers from him for travel and education.
This document is a court docket summary from the Southern District of New York regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the court's rulings on numerous pretrial motions filed by Maxwell, denying most of them, including motions to dismiss based on Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and statute of limitations. The court did, however, grant Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges for a separate trial and ordered both parties to negotiate and submit schedules for remaining pretrial matters by April 21, 2021.
This document is a table of contents page (Page ii) from a court filing appendix related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 22-1426), dated February 28, 2023. It lists legal orders, memoranda, and exhibits related to the post-trial controversy surrounding 'Juror 50,' including media articles published in January 2022 and a hearing transcript from March 2022. The document tracks the judicial process overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the motion for a new trial based on juror disclosures.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the logbook, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies ever sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms that their practice for keeping flight logbooks on Epstein's planes was to use initials for frequent passengers they recognized, such as 'SK', in order to save space. This establishes that initials in the logbook signify a recognized, repeat passenger.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The testimony establishes the protocol for scheduling flights during the 1990s and 2000s: Rodgers only coordinated directly with Ghislaine when she was a passenger; otherwise, he coordinated with Epstein's secretaries. The testimony specifically identifies Lesley Groff as Epstein's secretary who handled these duties in the 2000s.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on the communication methods used in the 1990s to schedule flights for someone named Epstein. It establishes that Rodgers and a colleague, Larry Visoski, would be contacted via beeper by Epstein's office and would then call back to speak with a secretary or assistant to arrange the flight.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, likely a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein. Rodgers testifies that during thousands of flights piloted for Epstein between 1994 and 2004 (and after), he never observed females on the plane who appeared to be under the age of 18 or 19 without guardians. He specifically confirms that a woman referred to as 'Jane' appeared to be at least 18 years old when he met her.
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination involving a witness named Hesse. The testimony focuses on Hesse's employment history with Maxwell and Epstein, specifically when she started (roughly September 2003) and stopped working for them (around 2004), and that she was hired by Epstein after an interview with Maxwell.
This document is page 91 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness, Mrs. Hesse, by Ms. Moe. The testimony focuses on identifying a message from 'Carolyn' in Exhibit 3E and establishing that Mrs. Hesse worked at the Palm Beach house specifically when Maxwell and Epstein were not home.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
The central subject of the document, an agreement whose scope and binding effect on other districts is being debated.
The speaker states that Epstein, not Ghislaine, called Annie's mom to arrange the trip.
Epstein personally met with Capt. Elmer Gudger and advised him that he no longer wished to prosecute Juan Alessi for burglary and theft.
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
A conversation between Epstein and the witness's mother is mentioned by Ms. Menninger as something that could be testified to by the mother herself.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Before the witness left, Epstein asked her to leave her phone number.
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Epstein was on the phone at the beginning of the massage session with ML.
Epstein told ML to leave her telephone number with his assistant so she could be contacted for work again.
The witness, A. Farmer, testified that she spoke with Epstein by phone approximately two or three times after her trip to New York.
After the alleged assault, Epstein told Jane Doe to write down her name and phone number.
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Epstein consistently notified Detective Deborah Anaya, a New Mexico official, whenever he spent time at his residence in New Mexico.
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Epstein filed a complaint which Edwards alleges was done without probable cause for the purpose of extortion.
Epstein called Maria and offered her a job at his mansion in New York City.
Burt Fields or Eileen Guggenheim spoke to Epstein about Maria to help advance her artistic career.
If a girl had not been to his home before, Epstein asked for her phone number to contact her in the future.
Epstein encouraged girls to find other girls interested in performing massages for him.
Epstein called Annie's mom and talked to her about Ghislaine being present for a trip.
Accusers offered to send photos to Epstein while he was in jail.
Notice to be provided if a FOIA request or compulsory process commands disclosure of the agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity