Epstein
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation began, contemporaneous with news reports of Epstein's arrest. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR's investigation into potential improper influence in the Epstein matter. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) where Epstein's legal team raised his financia... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting Epstein on a flight to TED. | In a jet, en route to TED. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Tea at Epstein's house in New York, where Epstein inquired about media. | Epstein's house, New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Accusation by the government that Epstein paid Maxwell millions for recruiting young, underage wo... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical scenario described by Ghislaine Maxwell involving money laundering, theft, and recov... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | John Roth handled Starr's letter and reviewed materials related to the Epstein matter, limiting h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Roth told OPR he understood Epstein had reneged on the NPA and considered it a "dead letter," thu... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deputy Attorney General Filip told OPR he believed the NPA was still in effect and that Epstein w... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein requested a meeting to argue for relief, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein meeting Princess Diana at an event. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein being invited to a house in the Vineyard or Nantucket, where he met Prince Andrew. | Vineyard or Nantucket | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein traveling to the Bahamas, hanging out with Sarah Ferguson, and meeting Prince Andrew. | Bahamas | View |
| N/A | N/A | First massage incident: MD provided a massage to Epstein. Epstein masturbated, exposed himself, a... | Epstein's house (master bed... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second massage incident: MD was approached to provide another massage. Epstein instructed her to ... | Epstein's house (master bed... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein served 13 months of an 18-month sentence at Palm Beach County Stockade with work-release ... | Palm Beach County Stockade | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein began serving one year of probation at his Palm Beach mansion and registered as a lifelon... | Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein potentially met or sat with Diana at an event, which was believed to be organized by Rosa. | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's guilty plea and rendering the agreement difficult to unwind. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Consideration of declaring Epstein in breach of the NPA, which could lead to litigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | State court plea for Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation of Epstein resolved through a state-based plea and NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Shut down of TerraMar due to 'Epstein drama'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein ordered daily massages following workout sessions. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013189.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between her current testimony and a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 regarding her visits to Epstein's residence. Specifically, she is questioned about whether it was Sarah or Maxwell who greeted her on her second visit and Sarah's role in scheduling massages.
DOJ-OGR-00013180.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on a statement Carolyn made to the FBI in 2007, where she reported seeing an older woman with an unknown accent at Epstein's residence. Carolyn confirms she made the statement and describes the day the FBI came to her home for the interview as a 'bad day'.
DOJ-OGR-00013176.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Attorneys, including Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, debate the appropriateness of discussing Carolyn's mental health and family issues, which are linked to past actions by someone named Epstein. The judge ultimately decides to move the sensitive discussion to the robing room to be held under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00013157.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on whether Carolyn was instructed by Ms. Roberts and/or a person named Virginia to lie about her age, claiming to be 17, to a man named Epstein. The transcript confirms Carolyn told the FBI this in 2007 and also discusses her first visit to Epstein's house, arranged by Ms. Roberts, to provide a massage for payment.
DOJ-OGR-00013058.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Meder by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. Meder testifies that they have no personal knowledge regarding the authenticity, accuracy, or origin of photos on CDs, including whether they were altered or previously sent to someone named Epstein. The questioning establishes the witness's inability to verify the integrity or factual representation of the photographic evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00013050.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Ms. Comey conducting a direct examination of a witness named Meder. The testimony centers on identifying a photograph (Government Exhibit 332) from a CD that was part of the 'Epstein and Maxwell investigation.' The witness is also questioned about their familiarity with the appearance of Virginia Roberts.
DOJ-OGR-00013041.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Meder. A government attorney, Ms. Comey, questions the witness about a photograph of Ghislaine Maxwell, which the witness confirms was sourced from a CD (logged as 1B63) reviewed during the 'Epstein and Maxwell investigation'. The photograph is successfully entered into evidence as Government's Exhibit 340 by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00013003.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring a legal argument regarding the admissibility of a topless photograph of an unnamed victim. The prosecution argues the photo corroborates testimony that the victim was a minor involved in the conspiracy, citing flight logs showing she traveled with Epstein and Maxwell at age 17. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger objects, citing photo metadata and testimony from Mr. Alessi (House Manager) suggesting the victim was an adult (met in 2001/2002) when the events occurred.
DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the prosecution arguing against the defendant's motions regarding sentencing. The prosecution asserts that the 2004 Sentencing Manual should apply, citing trial testimony that the conspiracy extended past 2004, and refutes the defendant's claim of having left the conspiracy and her association with Epstein in 2002. The document also notes that the government is prepared to present additional evidence, a message book seized by the Palm Beach Police Department, at the sentencing hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00010550.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 22, 2022, details the repeated sexual abuse of a minor named Carolyn, aged 14-15, by Epstein during massages. It outlines the significant role of an unnamed "defendant" who facilitated the abuse by scheduling the massages, paying Carolyn, and being aware of her age and vulnerable personal history. The defendant also invited Carolyn to travel with them and Epstein, further implicating them in the scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00010549.jpg
This legal document details a scheme of sexual abuse involving the defendant (Maxwell) and Epstein. It describes how Maxwell recruited 17-year-old Virginia Roberts in the summer of 2000, who was then paid for sexualized massages. The scheme escalated into a 'pyramid scheme' when Virginia, in 2001, introduced 14-year-old Carolyn, who was subsequently abused by Epstein over 100 times under the defendant's direction.
DOJ-OGR-00010548.jpg
This legal document details the testimony of a victim named Annie regarding a trip to Jeffrey Epstein's ranch in New Mexico. Annie states that she was groomed and sexually abused by both Epstein and an unnamed female defendant, who was in a romantic relationship with Epstein. The defendant allegedly used the pretense of giving a massage to sexually abuse Annie, and Epstein later assaulted her in her bed, as part of a coordinated effort to groom her for further abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00010546.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, details the sexual abuse of two victims, identified as Jane and Kate, by the defendant and Epstein. It describes how the abuse of Jane began when she was 14, with the defendant abusing a position of trust, and continued for years in multiple locations including Palm Beach, New York City, and New Mexico. The document also states that the abuse of another victim, Kate, began around the same time in 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00010544.jpg
This page from a court document outlines the grooming and abuse tactics employed by the defendant and Epstein, citing expert testimony from Dr. Lisa Rocchio. It describes two distinct phases of the conspiracy: an early phase (1994-2001) focused on isolating vulnerable individuals, and a later phase (2001-2004) involving a recruitment scheme at the Palm Beach residence where girls were paid to recruit others.
DOJ-OGR-00010543.jpg
This legal document describes Ghislaine Maxwell's role as supervisor of Jeffrey Epstein's households, where she acted as 'the lady of the house.' It details how she was financially supported by Epstein, receiving a townhouse and $23 million, while enforcing a strict culture of silence among staff to protect their criminal activities. The document cites a household manual and testimony from former manager Juan Alessi to illustrate the extreme rules of secrecy and obedience she imposed.
DOJ-OGR-00010539.jpg
This document is a legal filing arguing for a severe sentence for the defendant due to her extensive involvement in the sexual abuse of minors, emphasizing the seriousness of the offense and the defendant's lack of remorse. It rejects the defendant's claims regarding prison conditions and her attempts to shift blame, asserting that she willingly participated in and facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00010531.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 21, 2022. The defense argues that the sentencing hearing should not be an 'open forum' for alleged victims who were not part of the trial record, specifically naming Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein as individuals who should not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA for this specific case. The letter distinguishes Maxwell's case from the abatement of the Epstein case and requests advance notice of who will be permitted to speak at sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00009186.jpg
This document is a news article from the Daily Mail, filed as a legal exhibit, detailing an interview with 'Scotty,' a juror from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty expresses his satisfaction with the guilty verdict, stating the jury was convinced Maxwell was 'every bit as culpable' as her associate Epstein. He affirms that the prosecution proved its case 'beyond reasonable doubt' and that justice was served for the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00009184.jpg
This document is a legal exhibit from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-RA), filed on February 24, 2022. It consists of a screenshot of a Daily Mail Online article featuring a photograph of Maxwell and Epstein, with a caption stating she faced six sex trafficking counts based on the stories of four victims. The document is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00009184.
DOJ-OGR-00009173.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing detailing a juror's (David's) explanation for Ghislaine Maxwell's acquittal on a specific charge (count two) involving the accuser 'Jane'. David clarifies to 'The Independent' that the jury's decision was based on a lack of direct evidence that Maxwell 'enticed' Jane to travel, not on a disbelief of Jane's testimony. The document also mentions corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Maxwell's 'little black book', which listed names of 'masseuses' and Palm Beach police officers.
DOJ-OGR-00009171.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing, detailing the perspective of a juror named David. David explains to The Independent why he and the jury found the victims credible, despite defense arguments about their behavior and the fallibility of memory. He emphasizes that the jury's role was to judge the stories, not the victims' decisions, and notes that the defense's memory expert, Professor Elizabeth Loftus, did not sway their verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009138.jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing for the credibility of Juror 50 against a defendant's challenge. The filing contends that any inconsistencies in the juror's questionnaire answers should be assessed in a formal hearing, not based on public statements, and cites legal precedents suggesting jurors can make honest mistakes. It further argues that the juror's disclosure of having read about the defendant's connection to Epstein and the illogical nature of deliberately lying only to immediately risk exposure suggest the juror did not intentionally mislead the court.
DOJ-OGR-00008958.jpg
This legal document is a filing from the defense in the case against Epstein, arguing that their ability to challenge a witness named Jane's testimony was hampered. The defense claims that unavailable property records and the deaths of key witnesses, specifically architects Alberto Pinto and Roger Salhi, prevented them from proving that Epstein's properties were not constructed or occupied at the times Jane recalled, which would have cast doubt on her testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00008957.jpg
This legal document argues that the defense was hindered by the unavailability of contemporaneous phone and property records for Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and accusers. It cites two examples: the inability to challenge Carolyn's testimony that Maxwell called her to set up appointments, and the inability to rebut accuser Jane's testimony about the timing of her sexual abuse at Epstein's New York townhouse, which she described in detail.
DOJ-OGR-00008956.jpg
This legal document outlines the defense's argument that it was hindered by the unavailability of old records. Specifically, incomplete travel records from Shoppers Travel prevented them from challenging the testimony of witnesses Annie Farmer and Jane regarding their travel with Epstein. Furthermore, the lack of bank and credit card records from the 1990s and 2000s meant the defense could not contest the government's claims about a $30 million payment from Epstein to Ms. Maxwell or verify other key dates.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
Recruitment
Epstein told Dobbs 'You can bring girls.'
Second thoughts about public figure status
Epstein called Carter to say he was having second thoughts about being a public figure.
Discovery/Deposition Questions
Questions regarding allegations Epstein contends Edwards 'ginned up' or 'fabricated'.
Second Amended Complaint
Allegations that Edwards 'should have known' about the Ponzi scheme.
Socializing
Copperfield called Epstein frequently and left messages indicating they socialized together.
Important Message
A message from 'Epstein' for Vanessa Grigoriadis of NY Magazine, to be delivered at 5:10 P.M. The message itself is simply 'Epstein'.
Unspecified
A conversation between Epstein and the witness's mother is mentioned by Ms. Menninger as something that could be testified to by the mother herself.
Civil Case
Complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein'.
Bitcoin
Update on rapid Bitcoin price swings
Resignation/Leaving
Narrator told Epstein she wasn't coming back because she had fallen in love.
Phone records / Thank you notes
The speaker notes the absence of these records as evidence
Decision not to prosecute
Epstein personally met with Capt. Elmer Gudger and advised him that he no longer wished to prosecute Juan Alessi for burglary and theft.
Disclosure of Agreement
Notice to be provided if a FOIA request or compulsory process commands disclosure of the agreement.
No Subject
Email communication regarding Eva being in Paris and flying back, suggesting a close relationship with Epstein.
Complaint
Epstein filed a complaint which Edwards alleges was done without probable cause for the purpose of extortion.
General conversation
The witness, A. Farmer, testified that she spoke with Epstein by phone approximately two or three times after her trip to New York.
Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA)
The central subject of the document, an agreement whose scope and binding effect on other districts is being debated.
FOIA Request Notice
Notice to be provided if the US receives a FOIA request for this agreement.
Contact Information
Before the witness left, Epstein asked her to leave her phone number.
Arranging a trip
The speaker states that Epstein, not Ghislaine, called Annie's mom to arrange the trip.
Freedom of Information Act Notice
United States will provide notice to Epstein before disclosing agreement under FOIA.
Annie's trip
Discussion regarding Annie's trip to New Mexico
Invitation to New Mexico
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
Invitation to New Mexico
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
Ongoing communication
The witness, Kate, describes her communications with Epstein during her twenties and early thirties as having a 'friendly' tone. She continued communicating because she did not want to admit what had happened to her and was fearful of disengaging.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity