Epstein
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Provision regarding USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers and the safeguarding of these co... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged sexual molestation of minor girls on a daily basis for many years, including at... | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein continuing and her responsibilitie... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Litigation involving Epstein where his lawyers attacked the credibility of the girls. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery process blocked by Epstein and co-conspirators, leading to the need for alternative inv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell began looking for real estate for her dad and Epstein asked for help finding an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked Ghislaine Maxwell to continue helping him (find a house, etc.) after her father's d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's alleged criminal scheme and the defense's efforts to secure non-prosecution and immigra... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement provisions precluding criminal charges and immigration proceedings against certain indi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing for an 18-month incarceration, reduced from a 'non-negoti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiffs' motion to deny a protective order, which seeks to exclude Epstein from depositions, i... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Minor girl (Jane Doe #5) was taken to Epstein's mansion on El Brillo Way for massages and/or sex ... | Epstein's mansion on El Bri... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein serving 12 months of house arrest at his Palm Beach home, with curfew, no unsupervised co... | Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | 11-month investigation by Palm Beach police into Epstein paying underage girls for massages and s... | El Brillo Way home | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer declined to prosecute Epstein on unlawful sex acts with minors, ins... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state plea hearing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Menchel made substantive changes to Villafaña's draft letter concerning Epstein's plea deal, incl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea deal (non-prosecution agreement) for two prostitution charges. | state court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein served 13 months in Palm Beach County jail with work release privileges. | Palm Beach County jail | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI investigation into Epstein's international sex trafficking organization was quashed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attempt to get out of the NPA after it was signed. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008955.jpg
This legal document discusses the significance of flight records in a trial, arguing that contemporaneous passenger manifests and travel records were crucial for verifying accusers' timelines. It highlights the inadequacy of the flight logs kept by David Rodgers, which were incomplete and used generic identifiers. The document also references testimony from Cimberly Espinosa and Annie Farmer regarding travel arrangements made by Epstein, including flights for accuser 'Jane' when she was 16 and a trip for Annie Farmer to New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00008954.jpg
This legal document is a motion arguing that Ms. Maxwell's conviction should be vacated and the S2 Indictment dismissed. The defense claims that the government's excessive and prejudicial delay in bringing the prosecution violated her due process rights by causing critical documentary evidence and witnesses to become unavailable. The motion reasserts arguments from previously denied pretrial motions, which the Court had granted leave to renew after the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00008953.jpg
This page of a court document discusses the legal arguments regarding the conspiracy charges against Ms. Maxwell and Epstein. It argues that despite violating different statutes, the actions constituted a single criminal agreement to groom and abuse minors, rather than separate independent conspiracies, and analyzes the interdependence between the counts.
DOJ-OGR-00008943.jpg
This legal document analyzes a jury's deliberation, focusing on how flight logs kept by Epstein's pilot, Dave Rodgers, were used to corroborate testimony from a victim named Jane. The jury appears to have found no corroborating evidence for Ms. Maxwell's involvement in Jane's trips to New York, but did find evidence in the flight logs that Maxwell was a passenger on a trip with Jane to New Mexico. This distinction led the jury to focus its evaluation on Ms. Maxwell's involvement in the conduct that occurred in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00008942.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell's conviction on Count Four was likely improper. The argument centers on a note from the jury, which suggests they based the conviction on sexual abuse that victim 'Jane' experienced in New Mexico, facilitated by Maxwell. However, the charge required the intended sexual activity to be a violation of New York Penal Law, a condition the New Mexico events did not satisfy.
DOJ-OGR-00008939.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal filing (Document 600) from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022. It outlines legal arguments regarding the Mann Act conspiracy charges, emphasizing that the government is bound to prove a violation of New York Penal Law Section 130.55 as the specific criminal object of the conspiracy. The text cites previous court transcripts and filings where the government conceded that the conviction depends specifically on the violation of New York law.
DOJ-OGR-00008938.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 11, 2022, distinguishes between a 'constructive amendment' and a 'variance' in a criminal indictment, citing several legal precedents. It argues that the central element, or 'core of criminality,' of the Mann Act charges against Epstein and Ms. Maxwell was a clear scheme to entice underage girls to travel to New York for the purpose of violating New York law.
DOJ-OGR-00008931.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell to vacate her convictions and grant a new trial. The argument is that the jury improperly convicted her on charges based on testimony about events in New Mexico, which was outside the scope of the original indictment premised on violations of New York law. The filing contends this constituted a 'constructive amendment' of the indictment, making the conviction invalid.
DOJ-OGR-00008930.jpg
This legal document is an Omnibus Memorandum filed on February 11, 2022, by Ghislaine Maxwell in support of her post-trial motions. The defense argues that her convictions on the Mann Act counts should be vacated due to a constructive amendment from the original indictment, asserting the government failed to properly prove a violation of New York law as required. The motion also seeks alternative relief, including a new trial, judgment on only one conspiracy count, or a complete dismissal of the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00031538.jpg
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to share copies of exhibits after a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm a prior agreement that Goldberger will provide copies of all exhibits to him and the State Attorney, highlighting a potential conflict or lack of cooperation among the legal team.
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to provide copies of exhibits to Leopold and the State Attorney during a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm an agreement that Goldberger will now provide copies of all exhibits used.
DOJ-OGR-00031465.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report narrative, entered on November 12, 2003, details the investigation of a theft from a victim named Epstein by a suspect, Juan Alessi. The report states Alessi confessed to stealing money but denied taking a Glock handgun. Ultimately, Epstein decided not to press charges after reaching a private agreement with Alessi for repayment and formally notified Police Captain Elmer Gudger of his decision.
DOJ-OGR-00031453.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details an interview conducted on November 21, 2005, with former Epstein employees Juan and Maria Alessi. In the presence of their attorney and an Assistant State Attorney, they described their duties and observations, including the frequent arrival of young girls (appearing 16-17 years old) for massages. Juan Alessi specifically noted finding and cleaning sex toys (a vibrator and rubber penis) in the sink after these sessions and dealing with Epstein's girlfriend, Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00031441.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report from July 19, 2006, details a victim's account of ongoing sexual encounters involving herself, Jeffrey Epstein, and Nada Marcinkova. The victim describes a specific incident of alleged sexual assault where Epstein forcibly penetrated her, after which he apologized, paid her $1,000, and gave her a 2005 Dodge Neon. The report outlines a pattern of behavior including payment for sexual acts, the introduction of sex toys, and the physical injuries the victim sustained.
DOJ-OGR-00031422.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details the investigation of a burglary and theft at the residence of a victim named Epstein, with Juan Alessi as the suspect. The report notes that Alessi confessed to stealing money but not a handgun, and that Epstein subsequently reached a private agreement with Alessi for repayment. Following this agreement and a personal meeting with Police Captain Elmer Gudger, Epstein officially stated he no longer wished to prosecute, leading to instructions for police clerks to show a full recovery of the currency.
DOJ-OGR-00031215.jpg
This is a police dispatch log from August 4, 2005, documenting a burglary/intrusion alarm at 358 El Brillo Dr in Palm Beach. The property is associated with 'epstein', and the alarm originated from the master bedroom. The log indicates that the alarm company was contacted but stated they were not responding to the incident.
DOJ-OGR-00031190.jpg
A police dispatch log dated February 2, 2005, recording a response to an intrusion alarm at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach (Jeffrey Epstein's residence). The responding officer (Unit 203) made contact with a caretaker named Giayano and a female named Luella, confirming the alarm had reset and the situation was '10-4' (okay). The document was produced as part of a 2017 Public Records Request.
DOJ-OGR-00031185.jpg
This is a police dispatch call log from August 4, 2005, for an alarm at 358 El Brillo Dr in Palm Beach, a property associated with 'epstein'. A caller named Benham, presumably from an alarm company, reported an audible alarm in the master bedroom but informed the operator, Steve, that after speaking with a representative, they would not be responding.
DOJ-OGR-00019893.jpg
This is a page from a legal document, likely a defense memorandum, filed on July 10, 2020. The text argues against the government's assertion that Ms. Maxwell was 'hiding' from law enforcement after Epstein's arrest, claiming her actions, such as moving and changing her contact information, were necessary measures and not an attempt to evade prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00019878.jpg
This document is page 'iii' (Table of Authorities) from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents cited within the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and 'United States v. Salerno' (1987), along with a citation to 18 U.S.C. § 3142 regarding bail/detention. The page bears a Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00019878.
DOJ-OGR-00019872.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, argues that an unnamed defendant is a significant flight risk and should be denied bail. The prosecution asserts that since an indictment against Epstein was unsealed in July 2019, the defendant has been actively hiding, using an alias ('G Max'), changing phone numbers, and purchasing a 156-acre property in New Hampshire with cash through an anonymized LLC. The document concludes that due to her international connections, financial means, and lack of ties to the U.S., no bail conditions could reasonably assure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00019867.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, alleges that the defendant (implied to be Maxwell) encouraged victims to accept financial offers from Epstein and participated with him in grooming and abusing minors. It further claims the defendant lied under oath during a 2016 deposition in the Southern District of New York to conceal these crimes. The document then outlines the applicable law for detention under the Bail Reform Act, citing several legal precedents.
DOJ-OGR-00019866.jpg
This legal document provides background on a sealed indictment returned on June 29, 2020, against a defendant, identified as Maxwell. The charges, including conspiracy and sex trafficking of minors, stem from an alleged scheme with Epstein between 1994 and 1997 to sexually abuse underage girls at his properties in New York, Florida, and New Mexico. The document details Maxwell's alleged role in identifying, grooming, and abusing the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00019858.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. The filing argues that Maxwell is being unfairly detained under unacceptable conditions due to the "Epstein effect" and formally requests her release on bail or an evidentiary hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00019853.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she was living openly in her New Hampshire home, her lawyers were in communication with the government, and she had not left the U.S. for years. The document attributes her low profile to intense media harassment, citing a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun tabloid as a reason for her to seek privacy for safety.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
Invitation to New Mexico
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA)
The central subject of the document, an agreement whose scope and binding effect on other districts is being debated.
Arranging a trip
The speaker states that Epstein, not Ghislaine, called Annie's mom to arrange the trip.
Invitation to New Mexico
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
Unspecified
A conversation between Epstein and the witness's mother is mentioned by Ms. Menninger as something that could be testified to by the mother herself.
No Subject
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Contact Information
Before the witness left, Epstein asked her to leave her phone number.
Unknown
Epstein was on the phone at the beginning of the massage session with ML.
Future contact for work
Epstein told ML to leave her telephone number with his assistant so she could be contacted for work again.
Decision not to prosecute
Epstein personally met with Capt. Elmer Gudger and advised him that he no longer wished to prosecute Juan Alessi for burglary and theft.
General conversation
The witness, A. Farmer, testified that she spoke with Epstein by phone approximately two or three times after her trip to New York.
No Subject
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
No Subject
Message pads entered at trial show Carolyn called Epstein several times in the summer of 2004: once in late April or early May, again on July 6, and again on July 30.
Presence at New Mexico residence
Epstein consistently notified Detective Deborah Anaya, a New Mexico official, whenever he spent time at his residence in New Mexico.
No Subject
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Complaint
Epstein filed a complaint which Edwards alleges was done without probable cause for the purpose of extortion.
Job offer
Epstein called Maria and offered her a job at his mansion in New York City.
Maria's artistic career
Burt Fields or Eileen Guggenheim spoke to Epstein about Maria to help advance her artistic career.
Future contact
If a girl had not been to his home before, Epstein asked for her phone number to contact her in the future.
Recruiting other girls
Epstein encouraged girls to find other girls interested in performing massages for him.
Ghislaine being there
Epstein called Annie's mom and talked to her about Ghislaine being present for a trip.
No Subject
Accusers offered to send photos to Epstein while he was in jail.
Instruction to write down contact information
After the alleged assault, Epstein told Jane Doe to write down her name and phone number.
No Subject
A shipment from Epstein’s address in New York to Minor Victim-4, reflected in Federal Express records.
Disclosure of Agreement
Notice to be provided if a FOIA request or compulsory process commands disclosure of the agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity