Epstein
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
26
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Employee |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Prosecutor defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Co conspirators |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
location
Palm Beach residence
|
Ownership |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
USAO-SDFL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein carried out a course of action against Plaintiff's counsel. | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Unfounded filing of claims against Edwards by Epstein. | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of Epstein case from PBPD to FBI | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein investigation: FBI's Victim Specialist used VNS to generate various notification letters ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant encouraged Minor Victim-3 to provide Epstein massages | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Incident at a movie theater. | New Mexico (compared to New... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Completion of Phaidon transaction | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of returns | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Foot massage instruction session. | The Ranch (New Mexico), in ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massages/Sessions | Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | First meeting between Victim and Epstein. | [Redacted] | View |
| N/A | N/A | Secret Plea Bargain | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz admits to visiting Epstein's New Mexico ranch once for a few hours. | Epstein's New Mexico ranch | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz admits to visiting Epstein's home once with family. | Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Reiter observes Epstein with Nadia Marcinkova at a donation event; notes she looked afraid and wa... | Unspecified event | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment. | Deposition or Court Proceeding | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil lawsuits filed against Epstein by Edwards and others. | Florida (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Standard operating procedure for visits: Girls enter via kitchen, met by Epstein/associate, escor... | Epstein's Palm Beach Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Passenger named Emmy flew on Epstein's plane | Epstein's plane | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grooming and recruitment of Minor Victim-3 | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards on the eve of a summary judgment hearing. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | In-camera disclosure of settlement amounts. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruiting of minor girls | West Palm Beach mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal Discovery/Depositions | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil Suits | Court | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013377.jpg
This page is from a legal filing arguing for summary judgment in favor of a defendant named Edwards against allegations made by Epstein. The text argues that Epstein's claim of negligence—specifically that Edwards 'should have known' about a Ponzi scheme run by his law partner Scott Rothstein—is legally deficient and lacks necessary elements like duty and causation. The document cites Florida case law to support the argument that Edwards cannot be held liable for failing to anticipate Rothstein's criminal deception.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013374.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing, specifically the 'Argument' section regarding a summary judgment motion. It argues that Edwards is entitled to judgment against Epstein's claim because there are no disputed material facts under Florida law (Rule 1.510(c)). The text cites various legal precedents (Snyder v. Cheezem, Holl v. Talcott, etc.) to establish that Epstein cannot rely on bare assertions to avoid summary judgment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013362.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for 'Exhibit N' attached to Defendant Bradley J. Edwards's Statement of Undisputed Facts in the legal case Epstein v. Edwards (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). It indicates the document is part of a larger legal filing and bears a House Oversight production stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013324.jpg
This document details multiple instances of sexual assault by Epstein against minor females, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, who were 13 or 14 years old at the time. It highlights Epstein's repeated invocation of the Fifth Amendment during depositions when questioned about these activities, and notes that the victims were brought to his home by another underage victim. The United States Attorney's Office recognized L.M. as a victim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013313.jpg
This is page 10 of a legal filing titled 'Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment.' It argues that Epstein committed an 'abuse of process' by using his vast financial resources to file baseless lawsuits intended solely to extort and intimidate his molestation victims and Edwards into settling for less than their claims are worth. The document lists specific damages suffered by Edwards, including injury to reputation and fear of physical injury to himself and his family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013312.jpg
Page 9 of 15 from a legal filing in the case of Edwards vs. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The document argues that the 'litigation privilege' should not protect Epstein from claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process because his actions were malicious, unfounded, and targeted the Plaintiff's counsel without a legitimate judicial goal. It distinguishes Epstein's actions as an individual party from legal precedents involving attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013311.jpg
Page 8 of a legal filing in the case Edwards v. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The document is a legal argument opposing a summary judgment motion, specifically arguing that 'litigation privilege' does not protect a defendant from claims of 'malicious prosecution.' The text cites numerous Florida case precedents (Wright v. Yurko, Olson v. Johnson, etc.) to support the claim that malicious prosecution is a viable tort even in the context of judicial proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013498.tif
This document details allegations made by Epstein and counter-arguments regarding improper discovery and deposition notices in civil cases. It highlights Epstein's connections with prominent figures like Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson, often in the context of alleged child exploitation, sexual abuse, and flight logs. The document also mentions the return of campaign donations by Bill Richardson from Epstein, suggesting a desire to distance himself.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013495.tif
This document is a statement or response addressing allegations related to a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein and lawsuits against Epstein. The speaker denies knowledge of Rothstein's fraudulent activities and asserts their actions in representing clients against Epstein were legitimate, uncovering evidence of Epstein's sexual molestation and the obstruction of justice by Epstein and his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014076.jpg
This document is a page from a legal journal (2014) analyzing Crime Victims' Rights (CVRA) and is part of a House Oversight Committee production. It specifically critiques the Department of Justice's handling of the Epstein case, noting that while the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office initially notified victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) of their rights in June 2007, the Department later 'reversed course' regarding the applicability of the CVRA during litigation. The text highlights a specific letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña to a victim sent months before the nonprosecution agreement was signed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014066.jpg
This document is page 87 of a 2014 legal academic article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) position that victims' rights only apply after charges are filed, citing the 'Epstein case' (Does v. United States, S.D. Fla. 2011) as a precedent where the court concluded the CVRA contemplates pre-charge application. The text argues that limiting rights to the prosecution phase renders the statutory words 'detection' and 'investigation' meaningless.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014063.jpg
This document is page 84 of a law review article (Vol. 104) by Cassell et al., criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The authors argue that the OLC's interpretation effectively nullifies victims' rights in non-prosecution agreements, explicitly citing the 'Epstein case' as a notable example where this occurred. The footnotes highlight that the OLC opinion was released on May 20, 2011, shortly before the Government filed its response in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014050.jpg
This document is page 71 of a 2014 legal analysis (likely a law review article) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It uses the Epstein case as a primary example of why victims need rights before formal charges are filed, specifically citing how Jane Doe Number One and Two were not informed that prosecutors had secretly bargained away sex offense charges. The text argues that the CVRA's plain language supports extending rights to victims throughout the criminal justice process, even before charges are filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021906.jpg
This document is page 83 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness testifies that pilot Dave Rogers produced flight logs during sex abuse litigation against Epstein. The witness notes that when these logs were compared to logs provided by Mr. Dershowitz to the Palm Beach Police Department, inconsistencies were found, arousing suspicion. The testimony is briefly interrupted by Mr. Scott, who reports receiving a call from Epstein's lawyer, Darrin Indyke, regarding technical phone issues.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021885.jpg
This page of a transcript features a speaker detailing the factual basis for believing that regular house guests at properties in New York, London, and Florida would have been aware of sexual abuse occurring there. The speaker cites the brazen and repetitive nature of the activity discovered by the Palm Beach Police Department involving underage girls.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021701.jpg
This document is a printout of a Daily Mail news article page, marked as page 5 of 17, featuring a photograph of a woman identified as 'Virgina'. The text mentions Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, and a woman named Jane, referencing a meeting in New York and the subject's new life in Australia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021519.jpg
This document is a page from an FBI interview report describing interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The interviewee recounts visiting Epstein's residence, observing other girls, receiving an uncomfortable massage where she felt violated, and noting Epstein's sexual comments and behavior.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021450.jpg
This is page 4 of an FBI FD-302a continuation report dated February 2, 2007. The majority of the page is redacted, but the visible text describes a witness stating that Epstein was last at the Palm Beach residence prior to the execution of a State search warrant. The witness also notes that an individual with an unknown last name (LNU) visited the residence approximately three weeks before that warrant was executed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014148.jpg
A single page from an address book containing a list of contacts with names, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. The contacts are arranged in columns and include individuals such as Andrew Edwards, Johan Eliasch, Charlie Ellingworth, and Christina Estrada Juffali. The document is marked with page number 22 and case reference numbers at the bottom.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024246.tif
This document excerpt describes the author's encounters with Jeffrey Epstein, including meeting him on a flight to TED and being invited to his New York home. It details Epstein's past travels with Bill Clinton, his attempts to understand and influence media coverage, and his unsuccessful bid to acquire New York Magazine in 2004. The text also mentions media profiles on Epstein by Vicki Ward and Landon Thomas, focusing on his wealth and influence despite lacking conventional credentials.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024245.tif
This document excerpt describes Jeffrey Epstein's rise, his strategic relationships with wealthy individuals, and his acquisitions, including a Manhattan house from Les Wexner, airplanes, and a Caribbean island. It details a warning from 'Carter' about Epstein's potential for blackmail and highlights Epstein's association with Bill Clinton, referring to it as a 'fatal pairing'.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid for a lot in Ghislaine Maxwell's l... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unspecified recip... | $0.00 | Mention of a 'donation' Epstein had made on a d... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | underprivileged g... | $300.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Defense Attorneys | $0.00 | Cost of Epstein's defense | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victim | $300.00 | Payment for services (massage) | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Bill Richardson (... | $0.00 | Campaign donations from Epstein that Richardson... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $350.00 | Payment for massage | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Harvard | $30,000,000.00 | Donation for a theoretical physics research cen... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (first incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | MD | $200.00 | Payment for providing a massage (second incident). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Jane Doe #5 | $200.00 | Payment for giving a massage. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | $0.00 | Epstein paid Ghislaine Maxwell millions and mil... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | The Defendant (Gh... | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest included in defendant's assets for dete... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Edwards' clients | $0.00 | Settlement amounts Epstein voluntarily agreed t... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen Arts ... | $0.00 | Alleged payment for 'Jane'. The document text s... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Victims (implied) | $0.00 | Reference to 'Epstein's agreement... to provide... | View |
| N/A | Received | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Unknown (Construc... | $0.00 | Purchase or construction of a cabin at Interloc... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | Interlochen School | $0.00 | Possible donation of the cabin to the school (w... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | the defendant | $0.00 | Receipt of funds mentioned in context of missin... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
Resignation/Leaving
Narrator told Epstein she wasn't coming back because she had fallen in love.
Annie's trip
Discussion regarding Annie's trip to New Mexico
Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA)
The central subject of the document, an agreement whose scope and binding effect on other districts is being debated.
FOIA Request Notice
Notice to be provided if the US receives a FOIA request for this agreement.
Bitcoin
Update on rapid Bitcoin price swings
Freedom of Information Act Notice
United States will provide notice to Epstein before disclosing agreement under FOIA.
Arranging a trip
The speaker states that Epstein, not Ghislaine, called Annie's mom to arrange the trip.
Invitation to New Mexico
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
Phone records / Thank you notes
The speaker notes the absence of these records as evidence
Disclosure of Agreement
Notice to be provided if a FOIA request or compulsory process commands disclosure of the agreement.
Discovery/Deposition Questions
Questions regarding allegations Epstein contends Edwards 'ginned up' or 'fabricated'.
Job offer
Epstein called Maria and offered her a job at his mansion in New York City.
Ghislaine being there
Epstein called Annie's mom and talked to her about Ghislaine being present for a trip.
Unspecified
A conversation between Epstein and the witness's mother is mentioned by Ms. Menninger as something that could be testified to by the mother herself.
No Subject
Accusers offered to send photos to Epstein while he was in jail.
Contact Information
Before the witness left, Epstein asked her to leave her phone number.
Complaint
Epstein filed a complaint which Edwards alleges was done without probable cause for the purpose of extortion.
Maria's artistic career
Burt Fields or Eileen Guggenheim spoke to Epstein about Maria to help advance her artistic career.
Future contact
If a girl had not been to his home before, Epstein asked for her phone number to contact her in the future.
Invitation to New Mexico
Epstein called Annie's mom to invite Annie to New Mexico, falsely claiming that 20 to 25 other girls and his wife, Ghislaine, would be there.
General conversation
The witness, A. Farmer, testified that she spoke with Epstein by phone approximately two or three times after her trip to New York.
Decision not to prosecute
Epstein personally met with Capt. Elmer Gudger and advised him that he no longer wished to prosecute Juan Alessi for burglary and theft.
Recruiting other girls
Epstein encouraged girls to find other girls interested in performing massages for him.
Civil Case
Complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein'.
Second Amended Complaint
Allegations that Edwards 'should have known' about the Ponzi scheme.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity