SDNY CM/ECF
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00030581.pdf
This document is a Notice of Docket Activity from the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated October 8, 2020. It confirms the filing of an Oral Argument Statement (LR 34.1(a)) in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Case No. 20-3061) by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney.
EFTA00022958.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2020, initiated by an automated PacerPro notification regarding a 'Motion to Stay' filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 20-02413). Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP forwarded this notification to colleagues (including Peter Skinner), stating that she would respond to the motion by the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00000776.jpg
This document is the second page of a court filing (Case 19-2221) dated July 23, 2019. It provides procedural instructions for attorneys and pro se parties regarding updating contact information via PACER or mail, as well as guidelines for reviewing case captions and appellate designations pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP).
DOJ-OGR-00020735.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket report for Case 22-1426, related to Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several filings made in August 2022 concerning the official transcripts of her trial (December 2021) and sentencing (June 2022), including deadlines for redaction requests. The page also includes a PACER transaction receipt from February 22, 2023, showing a $3.00 charge for accessing the docket report.
DOJ-OGR-00020732.jpg
This document is a court docket page from Case 22-1426, showing multiple entries filed on August 10, 2022. The entries are notices of filing for the official transcripts of Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, which occurred on several dates in December 2021 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document specifies the deadlines for parties to request redactions before the transcripts are made publicly available through the PACER system.
DOJ-OGR-00020730.jpg
This document is a court docket from the Southern District of New York, dated August 10, 2022, for Case 22-1426. It details the filing of official transcripts from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, which took place in late 2021 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries establish deadlines for parties to request redactions (August 31, 2022) before the transcripts are made publicly available through PACER on November 9, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00020727.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for Case 22-1426, involving the USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details a series of legal filings, primarily letters and motions, entered on July 12, 2022, from both the prosecution (USA) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings, dated from late 2021, cover various pre-trial issues such as witness testimony, expert disclosures, and jury instructions, and the log also notes the deletion of a sealed document that was filed in error.
DOJ-OGR-00020718.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 22-1426, detailing filings and orders related to defendant Ghislaine Maxwell between March 9 and March 15, 2022. The entries primarily concern post-trial matters, including orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan on document redactions and juror anonymity, as well as a motion for a new trial filed by Maxwell's team and the subsequent opposition memoranda filed by the USA.
DOJ-OGR-00020716.jpg
This document represents a page from the SDNY court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 25 and March 3, 2022. The entries focus heavily on post-trial motions regarding 'Juror 50', who was scheduled for a hearing on March 8, 2022. Key developments include Juror 50's attorney notifying the court that the juror intended to invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and the Government's subsequent notification that they were seeking approval to compel the juror's testimony via immunity orders (18 U.S.C. §§ 6002 and 6003).
DOJ-OGR-00020699.jpg
This document is a court docket from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from late November 2021. The entries primarily concern procedural matters ahead of trial, including court orders for the production of documents from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, motions regarding expert testimony, and letters from both the prosecution (USA) and Maxwell's defense team about trial procedures and jury instructions. The presiding judge is Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020696.jpg
This document is a court docket from November 22, 2021, detailing numerous filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries include an order regarding the testimony of 'Witness-3', an endorsement about providing a video monitor, and a series of letters and motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. These filings address various pre-trial matters such as redactions, subpoenas, and the admissibility of evidence like birth certificates and testimony from 'Accuser-3'.
DOJ-OGR-00020687.jpg
This document is a court docket entry from February 28, 2023, for Case 22-1426, primarily concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It details court orders and filings from November 2021, including COVID-19 protocols for courthouse access, scheduling revisions for motions in limine, and a pretrial conference. The entries highlight communications between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys) regarding trial logistics and a ruling on witness testimony, all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020679.jpg
This document is a court docket from Case 22-1426, detailing a series of legal filings and court orders from October 27 to October 29, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling a pretrial conference for November 1, 2021, and numerous motions in limine filed by both the defense and prosecution to exclude specific evidence ahead of the trial. The document outlines the procedural steps and legal arguments being made by both sides in preparation for the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020675.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from October 15 to October 18, 2021. The entries primarily concern pre-trial procedural matters, including a dispute over the timely delivery of legal mail to Maxwell at the MDC, and judicial orders setting deadlines for motions related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412. The docket reflects communications between the prosecution (USA), the defense (Maxwell's counsel), and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020674.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court activities from October 12 to October 14, 2021. It records a series of procedural filings and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including motions from the defense regarding jury selection (voir dire) and legal mail delivery, and letters from the prosecution (USA) concerning trial length and juror questionnaires. The docket also includes an order addressing trial access for alleged victims and the public.
DOJ-OGR-00020671.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for the case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 28, 2023, but detailing events from August 2021. The entries describe several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including the denial of Maxwell's motion for subpoenas and instructions on sealing documents. The docket also records letters filed by both the defense, concerning interference with attorney-client communications at the MDC, and the prosecution (USA), regarding the identification of co-conspirators, along with the judge's orders for the parties to confer on these issues.
DOJ-OGR-00020670.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, detailing filings from July and August 2021. Key events include letters filed by Maxwell's defense team, a motion to suppress evidence, and a significant order from Judge Alison J. Nathan admonishing attorney David Markus for writing an op-ed about the case. The log culminates with the court denying Maxwell's supplemental pre-trial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00020654.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from the Southern District of New York regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the court's rulings on numerous pretrial motions filed by Maxwell, denying most of them, including motions to dismiss based on Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and statute of limitations. The court did, however, grant Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges for a separate trial and ordered both parties to negotiate and submit schedules for remaining pretrial matters by April 21, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020650.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for Case 22-1426, detailing legal filings from March 24 to March 29, 2021, related to Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include attorneys from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP appearing for victims, the prosecution (USA) and defense counsel filing letters with Judge Alison J. Nathan, and the filing of a superseding indictment against Maxwell. The docket also records a motion to appear pro hac vice and a related $200 filing fee.
DOJ-OGR-00020646.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) detailing a series of motions and supporting memorandums filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on February 4, 2021. The filings, entered by her attorneys Jeffrey Pagliuca and Mark Cohen, seek to dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment, suppress evidence, and strike surplusage from the indictment. The legal grounds for these motions include due process violations, pre-indictment delay, breach of a non-prosecution agreement, and claims that charges are time-barred.
DOJ-OGR-00020640.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from December 2020. Key events include a letter from Maxwell's counsel regarding a motion for bail, a subsequent order from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying a request to summon the MDC warden to testify about Maxwell's confinement conditions, and the filing of a conference transcript. The judge ordered the government to provide regular updates on Maxwell's access to legal materials and counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020624.jpg
This legal document from the Southern District of New York, dated February 28, 2023, outlines the sentencing disposition for an unnamed defendant in case 22-1426. It lists the defendant's legal counsel and details the sentences for various counts, including concurrent prison terms up to 240 months, supervised release, and a $750,000 fine. The pending counts relate to conspiracy and coercion involving minors for illegal sexual acts.
DOJ-OGR-00019590.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 20-3061) dated September 24, 2020. It contains a Certificate of Compliance signed by Adam Mueller confirming the motion meets word count limitations, and a Certificate of Service signed by Nicole Simmons confirming the filing of an 'Unopposed Motion for Leave to File under Seal' regarding Appendix Volume 2 via CM/ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00019301.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service dated September 10, 2020, signed by Nicole Simmons. It certifies that Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion to Consolidate Appeal was filed with the Court via CM/ECF and a copy was emailed to all counsel of record on that date. The document confirms the proper legal service of the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019238.jpg
This document is a procedural instruction sheet from a court case (Case 20-3061), dated September 9, 2020. It outlines the requirements for attorneys and pro se parties to update their contact information via PACER or by letter, and explains the protocols for reviewing and correcting case captions and appellate designations. The document contains a DOJ footer (DOJ-OGR-00019238).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity