DOJ-OGR-00020675.jpg
1.16 MB
Extraction Summary
6
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.16 MB
Summary
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from October 15 to October 18, 2021. The entries primarily concern pre-trial procedural matters, including a dispute over the timely delivery of legal mail to Maxwell at the MDC, and judicial orders setting deadlines for motions related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412. The docket reflects communications between the prosecution (USA), the defense (Maxwell's counsel), and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of multiple court orders, letters, and motions filed between October 15 and October 18, 2021.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Signed multiple orders and endorsements related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case on 10/14/2021 and 10/15/2021.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA |
Listed as an author on letters from the USA to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's case.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA |
Listed as an author and filer on letters from the USA to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's case.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA |
Listed as an author on letters from the USA to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's case.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Attorney |
Filed a LETTER RESPONSE in Support of Motion on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SDNY CM/ECF | government agency |
Identified as the court's electronic filing system, Southern District of New York Case Management/Electronic Case Files.
|
| USA | government agency |
The prosecuting party in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filing multiple letters.
|
| The Court | government agency |
Referred to throughout the document as the judicial body making orders and receiving filings, specifically the U.S. D...
|
| Government | government agency |
Used interchangeably with 'USA' to refer to the prosecution.
|
Timeline (5 events)
2021-10-15
Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered the Government to respond to the Defendant's letter regarding the delivery of legal mail at MDC.
SDNY
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Government
2021-10-15
Judge Nathan issued an endorsement on a government letter, resolving the motion regarding legal mail delivery (Dkt. No. 346) without issuing the defendant's requested order but stating an expectation of timely delivery.
SDNY
2021-10-15
Judge Nathan issued a memo endorsement setting a deadline of October 27, 2021, for motions under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, with responses due November 1, 2021.
SDNY
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's legal mail is delivered. Likely the Metropolitan Detent...
|
Relationships (3)
Ghislaine Maxwell is the defendant in a case over which Judge Alison J. Nathan is presiding. The document shows the judge issuing orders related to Maxwell's case.
Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a letter response in support of a motion on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating an attorney-client relationship.
The AUSAs representing the USA are the prosecution in the criminal case against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. They are filing letters and responding to defense motions.
Key Quotes (3)
"Based on the information in this letter the Court will not enter the Defendant's requested order. ... However, it is the Court's firm expectation that a defendant in a pre-trial posture like Ms. Maxwell will in most circumstances receive legal mail within approximately 1 business day."Source
— Judge Alison J. Nathan
(From an ENDORSED LETTER (Dkt. 353) responding to a motion about delayed legal mail delivery to Ghislaine Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00020675.jpg
Quote #1
"For the reasons stated in this letter, the Court finds that there is good cause for any motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 to be filed no later than October 27, 2021."Source
— Judge Alison J. Nathan
(From a MEMO ENDORSEMENT (Dkt. 354) on a letter from the USA regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 412.)
DOJ-OGR-00020675.jpg
Quote #2
"The document was incorrectly filed in this case."Source
— Court Clerk (jm)
(Explanation for the deletion of document number 354.)
DOJ-OGR-00020675.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,894 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page57 of 208
A-53
A-53
2/22/23, 1:25 PM
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
Government is hereby ORDERED to respond by 5:00 p.m. tomorrow, October 15, 2021. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/14/2021) (ap) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
10/15/2021
348
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's letter regarding delivery of Defendant's legal mail at MDC. Dkt. No. 346. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond as soon as possible but by no later than today, October 15, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/15/2021) (ap) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
348
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's letter regarding delivery of Defendant's legal mail at MDC. Dkt. No. 346. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond as soon as possible but by no later than today, October 15, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/15/2021) (ap) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
10/15/2021
349
SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
349
SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
10/15/2021
350
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 15, 2021 re: Delivery of Legal Mail at MDC Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
350
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 15, 2021 re: Delivery of Legal Mail at MDC Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
10/15/2021
351
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 15, 2021 re: Federal Rule of Evidence 412 Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
351
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 15, 2021 re: Federal Rule of Evidence 412 Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
10/15/2021
352
LETTER RESPONSE in Support of Motion by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 10/15/2021 re: 346 MOTION to Direct MDC to deliver legal mail within one day of receipt .. (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
352
LETTER RESPONSE in Support of Motion by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 10/15/2021 re: 346 MOTION to Direct MDC to deliver legal mail within one day of receipt .. (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
10/15/2021
353
ENDORSED LETTER as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Counsels of record for the Government dated 10/15/21 re: Government response to Order of The Court dated 10/15/21 (Dkt No. 348).ENDORSEMENT: Based on the information in this letter the Court will not enter the Defendant's requested order. See Dkt. 346. However, it is the Court's firm expectation that a defendant in a pre-trial posture like Ms. Maxwell will in most circumstances receive legal mail within approximately 1 business day. Going forward, if another delay occurs, the Defendant may renew the request for a specific order requiring delivery within the time frame. With this understanding and in light of the unusually early pre-trial disclosure schedule set by the Court, the Court remains confident that Ms. Maxwell and her attorneys are fully able to prepare for her trial. This resolves Dkt. No. 346. SO Ordered.. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/15/21)(jm) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
353
ENDORSED LETTER as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Counsels of record for the Government dated 10/15/21 re: Government response to Order of The Court dated 10/15/21 (Dkt No. 348).ENDORSEMENT: Based on the information in this letter the Court will not enter the Defendant's requested order. See Dkt. 346. However, it is the Court's firm expectation that a defendant in a pre-trial posture like Ms. Maxwell will in most circumstances receive legal mail within approximately 1 business day. Going forward, if another delay occurs, the Defendant may renew the request for a specific order requiring delivery within the time frame. With this understanding and in light of the unusually early pre-trial disclosure schedule set by the Court, the Court remains confident that Ms. Maxwell and her attorneys are fully able to prepare for her trial. This resolves Dkt. No. 346. SO Ordered.. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/15/21)(jm) (Entered: 10/15/2021)
10/15/2021
354
MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 351 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 15, 2021 re: Federal Rule of Evidence 412. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated in this letter, the Court finds that there is good cause for any motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 to be filed no later than October 27, 2021. Any response will be due November 1, 2021. Any hearing will tentatively be scheduled for November 5, 2021. Additional details will be provided if and when any motions are filed. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 10/27/2021, Responses due by 11/1/2021) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/15/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 10/18/2021)
354
MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 351 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 15, 2021 re: Federal Rule of Evidence 412. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated in this letter, the Court finds that there is good cause for any motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 to be filed no later than October 27, 2021. Any response will be due November 1, 2021. Any hearing will tentatively be scheduled for November 5, 2021. Additional details will be provided if and when any motions are filed. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 10/27/2021, Responses due by 11/1/2021) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/15/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 10/18/2021)
10/18/2021
***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 354 Rule 5(f) as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (jm) (Entered: 10/18/2021)
***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 354 Rule 5(f) as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (jm) (Entered: 10/18/2021)
10/18/2021
355
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 18, 2021 re: Response to Defense Motion for Limited Attorney-Conducted Voir Dire and Individual Sequestered Voir Dire Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 10/18/2021)
355
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 18, 2021 re: Response to Defense Motion for Limited Attorney-Conducted Voir Dire and Individual Sequestered Voir Dire Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 10/18/2021)
https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1
53/113
DOJ-OGR-00020675
53/113
DOJ-OGR-00020675
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document