SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Location
Mentions
4701
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
2330
Also known as:
Southern District of New York (implied by reporter name) Southern District of New York Office

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

EFTA00016295.pdf

Internal DOJ/SDNY email chain from March 2019 coordinating the transfer and digital upload of evidence files related to the Epstein case. The correspondence discusses a discrepancy in the number of pages received from the D.C. FOIA office (16,000 vs 29,000), the organization of 'Boies docs', and video discs related to a 'black book sting'. An Assistant US Attorney directs an FBI case agent and a contractor to manage the data upload to a shared network drive for review on Relativity.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00016268.pdf

This document is a defense expert witness disclosure letter in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 1, 2021. It details the qualifications and expected testimony of eight expert witnesses, covering topics such as false memory (Dr. Loftus), the lack of scientific basis for 'grooming-by-proxy' (Dr. Dietz), forensic psychiatry, prosecutorial misconduct, computer forensics, and document authentication. The defense strategy aims to challenge the reliability of memory, rebut government claims about grooming behaviors, and analyze financial and physical evidence.

Legal correspondence (expert witness disclosure)
2025-12-25

EFTA00016247.pdf

This document is a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It establishes strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, distinguishing between standard, 'Confidential', and 'Highly Confidential' information (which includes sexualized imagery), and limiting access to the Defendant, Defense Counsel, and specific authorized persons. The order specifically mandates that highly confidential materials containing sexualized images must not be copied or possessed by the defendant outside the presence of counsel.

Protective order
2025-12-25

EFTA00016159.pdf

This document is an email chain from June 2020 between attorneys at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing the legal procedural requirements (specifically '6(e) orders' related to grand jury secrecy) needed to allow the Civil division to review specific 'trust agreements' related to the Epstein case. The discussion highlights concerns about privacy, protective orders, and whether to notify the individuals who provided the trust agreements.

Email chain / internal doj correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00016156.pdf

An internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Affairs division) dated June 30, 2020. The email circulates a document titled 'Ghislaine_Maxwell_Visual_DRAFT_v5.pdf', described as 'Formatted for printing', likely in preparation for the press announcement of her arrest which occurred two days later on July 2, 2020.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00016130.pdf

This document contains an email chain from July and August 2019 regarding the case 'US v. Gatto'. Jonathan M. Albano of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP asks other counsel if they object to him filing a copy of the Second Circuit's decision in 'Brown v. Maxwell' (a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell unsealing) with the court. The underlying email from a redacted Assistant US Attorney provides the government's opposition to a motion by Oath Inc. to intervene in the Gatto case.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00015971.pdf

This document is an email dated December 21, 2020, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'interlocutory appeals' and it contains an attachment titled 'Maxwell_Brief_re_Interlocutory_Appeals.pdf', indicating it relates to the legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00015951.pdf

This document is an email chain from July 6-11, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and prison officials (MDC) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell shortly after her arrest. The emails coordinate urgent legal calls between Maxwell and her defense counsel (specifically Mr. Everdell) ahead of court deadlines and her arraignment scheduled for July 14, 2020. There is discussion regarding a 'standing legal call' at 10:00 AM and adherence to EDNY/SDNY protocols for scheduling inmate calls.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00015919.pdf

Email correspondence from November 12, 2019, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and a Senior Forensic Examiner regarding the processing of electronic evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein. The AUSA expresses concern that while the New York residence evidence (approx. 10-11 computers) was expected by late October, the 'island materials' (likely Little St. James) appear untouched by the FBI, which they describe as the 'tip of the iceberg.' The examiner responds that the process is complex but anticipates files will be ready by the following Thursday.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00015846.pdf

This document is an email chain from July 2020 between Audrey Strauss and other Assistant U.S. Attorneys at the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a draft letter to the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (also trustees of the 1953 Trust Agreement). The prosecutors discuss seeking a waiver of attorney-client privilege from the estate to assist with their discovery review and production process.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00015726.pdf

This document is a civil complaint filed on September 21, 2015, in the Southern District of New York by a redacted Plaintiff (identifiable by context as Virginia Giuffre) against Ghislaine Maxwell. The complaint alleges defamation arising from Maxwell's public statements in January 2015, where she called the Plaintiff a liar regarding allegations of sex trafficking and sexual abuse involving Jeffrey Epstein. The document details the history of the alleged abuse (1999-2002), the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and Maxwell's specific efforts to discredit the Plaintiff's reputation.

Civil complaint (legal pleading)
2025-12-25

EFTA00015654.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 29, 2021, between court executives at the Southern District of New York regarding the start of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Edward Friedland requests an urgent update to the court's website to remove outdated phone access information, noting that the trial is in-person only with no broadcast or dial-in. The correspondence includes draft text for the website detailing victim attendance coordination, public access via overflow rooms, and strict COVID-19 entry protocols.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00015636.pdf

This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding discovery disputes. Key issues include the logistics of providing electronic discovery to Maxwell in prison (MDC) because she cannot use disks, missing email attachments, and metadata discrepancies for thousands of files and photos recovered from Epstein's devices and residences. The prosecution explains that 'carved' or deleted files lack original metadata and that certain photos came from seized CDs rather than devices processed by the FBI's CART unit.

Legal email correspondence (discovery dispute)
2025-12-25

EFTA00015593.pdf

This document is a chain of internal emails from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) between March and July 2019, requesting administrative approval for government travel. The travel requests are explicitly for the 'United States v. Epstein' case (2018R01618), described as an investigation into the 'enticement of minors for sexual activity.' The emails detail multiple trips by Assistant U.S. Attorneys and agents to Florida (Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale) and Los Angeles to conduct victim interviews.

Internal email chain / travel authorization requests
2025-12-25

EFTA00015580.pdf

This document contains a series of internal Department of Justice emails from March to July 2019, detailing travel requests by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The requests seek approval for travel to Florida (Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale) and Los Angeles to conduct victim interviews and meetings for the investigation 'United States v. Epstein' (Case ID 2018R01618). The emails confirm active investigation and victim outreach months prior to Epstein's July 2019 arrest.

Email chain / government travel request
2025-12-25

EFTA00015574.pdf

This document is an email thread from July 8, 2019, among staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject is the final review of a press release concerning Jeffery Epstein. The thread includes a draft statement from an unnamed FBI Assistant Director urging potential victims to contact the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI, regardless of when or where incidents occurred.

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00015570.pdf

An email dated July 4, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney at the Southern District of New York containing a list of vehicles associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The list details 15 vehicles, primarily SUVs (Chevy Suburbans, Yukon, Escalade, Expedition, Range Rover, Hummer II) and luxury cars (Bentley, Mercedes Benz), with their specific registration numbers or license plates redacted.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00015568.pdf

This document is an email dated July 7, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to attorney Robert C. Josefsberg. The prosecutor informs Josefsberg that news of Jeffrey Epstein's arrest has leaked to the media prematurely and requests an urgent call to discuss the status so Josefsberg can inform his clients (implied to be victims).

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00015564.pdf

An email dated June 17, 2019, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email contains a link to a 2015 Curbed article detailing Jeffrey Epstein's real estate holdings. The names of the sender and recipient are redacted.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00015530.pdf

This document is an email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York dated July 12, 2019. The emails discuss the finalization and filing of the government's opposition to a bail motion, evidenced by the attachment '2019-07-12, _JE,_government_opposition_to_bail_motion_(with_exhibits).pdf', where 'JE' likely refers to Jeffrey Epstein. One attorney mentions working remotely while waiting for a flight.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00015517.pdf

Supplemental declaration by Russell Capone filed on January 15, 2021, in the FOIA case between The New York Times and the Bureau of Prisons. Capone justifies the withholding of specific BOP records—including staffing rosters, psychology records, and logs from July and August 2019—under Exemption 7(A) to prevent interference with the ongoing criminal prosecutions of Noel and Tartaglione related to Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration and death.

Legal declaration (supplemental declaration of russell capone)
2025-12-25

EFTA00015515.pdf

Supplemental declaration filed by BOP Staff Attorney Nicole McFarland in the NYT v. BOP lawsuit. The document corrects a previous statement regarding FOIA records, clarifying that a specific log book entry for Jeffrey Epstein on July 30, 2019, represented a phone call he made from the MCC Intake area, rather than a visit he received.

Legal declaration
2025-12-25

EFTA00015493.pdf

This document is a Supplemental Declaration filed by BOP official Kara Christenson in a FOIA lawsuit brought by The New York Times. It details the BOP's processing of records related to Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration and death, correcting previous statements about visitor logs (clarifying one was a phone log) and justifying the withholding of information such as third-party names, security techniques, and internal investigation details under various FOIA exemptions. It specifically notes that Epstein did not send or receive emails via the prison system and that records of funds transferred to him exist but identifying information of the transferors is withheld.

Supplemental declaration (legal court filing)
2025-12-25

EFTA00015438.pdf

This document is a legal declaration by Russell Capone filed in the SDNY regarding a FOIA lawsuit by the New York Times against the Bureau of Prisons. It argues for withholding records related to Jeffrey Epstein's detention and death to avoid interfering with the pending criminal prosecutions of correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas (for falsifying records) and inmate Nicholas Tartaglione (for multiple murders). Attached as exhibits are the indictments for Noel/Thomas, detailing the night of Epstein's death, and Tartaglione, detailing the 'Likquid Lounge' quadruple homicide.

Legal declaration with attached indictments
2025-12-25

EFTA00015359.pdf

This document is an email dated September 27, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email circulates a document titled 'MCC_Pros_Memo_v10.doc' to a group of redacted recipients for their review. The subject 'MCC Pros Memo' likely refers to a prosecution memorandum related to the Metropolitan Correctional Center, possibly concerning the investigation into events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's detention or death.

Email
2025-12-25
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity