SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00019514.jpg
This document is the signature page for a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 27, 2020. It is ordered by Judge Alison J. Nathan and shows the agreement and consent of both the prosecution, led by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, and the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by her legal counsel. The specific nature of the order is not detailed on this page.
DOJ-OGR-00019503.jpg
This is the first page of a Proposed Protective Order filed on July 27, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over the document, which outlines the Government's intent to produce discovery materials to the defense while limiting public disclosure to protect privacy, the ongoing investigation, and fair trial rights. The document establishes the legal framework for handling sensitive information pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16.
DOJ-OGR-00019495.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 21, 2020, arguing that lawyers Boies and McCawley made prejudicial extrajudicial statements in ABC News interviews regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing quotes the lawyers describing Maxwell as a 'central figure' who 'worked hand-in-hand' with Epstein and suggesting other participants should be worried. The author requests a court order to prohibit further public comments that could damage Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00019490.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 21, 2020, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of his client, Ghislaine Maxwell, Pagliuca requests a court order to prohibit the government and its agents from making extrajudicial statements about her case. The letter argues that such statements are prejudicial and violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial by an impartial jury, citing legal precedents to support the court's authority to issue such an order.
DOJ-OGR-00019489.jpg
This document is the cover page of a superseding indictment, case number S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), filed on July 8, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The indictment is brought by the United States of America against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and is presented by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00019487.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal indictment filed on July 8, 2020, detailing Count Six (Perjury) against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that during a deposition on July 22, 2016, Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony by denying any knowledge of sex toys or devices at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house or in his possession. The document quotes the specific questions and her negative responses that form the basis of the perjury charge.
DOJ-OGR-00019486.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically outlining Count Five for Perjury. It alleges that on April 22, 2016, Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony during a deposition when she denied knowledge of a scheme by Jeffrey Epstein to recruit underage girls. The indictment also references prior allegations that Maxwell arranged for the transportation of 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019485.jpg
This page of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell details specific allegations of abuse and recruitment. It charges that in 1996, Maxwell personally gave an unsolicited massage to a topless minor in New Mexico, and between 1994-1995, encouraged another minor to massage Jeffrey Epstein in London knowing abuse would occur. It also introduces 'Count Four,' charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00019481.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 8, 2020, outlines statutory allegations against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that from approximately 1994 to 1997, Maxwell conspired with Jeffrey Epstein and others in the Southern District of New York to entice individuals to travel for illegal sexual activity, in violation of U.S. federal law (Title 18, Section 2422).
DOJ-OGR-00019472.jpg
This document is the first page of a Superseding Indictment (S1 20 Cr. 330) filed in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. Count One charges her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview alleges that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell assisted Jeffrey Epstein in recruiting, grooming, and abusing girls as young as 14, knowing they were underage.
DOJ-OGR-00019469.jpg
This document contains a chronological list of docket entries from August 2020 in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). The entries detail various legal motions, including requests for discovery disclosure, protective orders, and sealing of documents, alongside judicial orders and endorsements by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It concludes with a notice of attorney appearance for the USA.
DOJ-OGR-00019461.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket report (SDNY) for Case 20-3061, dated September 2020. It lists numerous pending felony counts against a defendant, including conspiracy to entice minors, coercion/enticement of minors for illegal sex acts, transportation of minors for criminal sexual activity, and perjury (false declarations). The document contains a Department of Justice stamp (DOJ-OGR-00019461) and appears to be part of the legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell, given the specific nature of the charges and the case timeline.
DOJ-OGR-00019445.jpg
This document is a Memorandum and Order from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) dated September 14, 2020, in the civil case of Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman grants a motion filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to stay the civil proceedings entirely pending the resolution of Maxwell's parallel criminal case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document notes that Maxwell is currently in custody at the MDC awaiting a criminal trial scheduled for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00019440.jpg
This document is a Memorandum Opinion and Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on September 2, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses Maxwell's request to file certain discovery materials under seal, with the court deciding to adopt the Government's proposed redactions to protect an ongoing grand jury investigation. The court orders both parties to confer and submit their final proposed redactions by September 4, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00019425.jpg
This document is page 21 (filed as page 26) of a legal brief in Case 20-3061, filed on September 24, 2020. It argues that a writ of mandamus is appropriate because Judge Nathan abused her discretion regarding a protective order and Judge Preska's unsealing order relies on inconsistent decisions within the Southern District of New York. The text discusses the unsealing of deposition materials and claims prejudice against Ms. Maxwell, though specific details are heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00019409.jpg
This legal document from September 24, 2020, discusses judicial proceedings involving Ms. Maxwell. It notes that Judge Preska took over a case from the late Judge Sweet and describes how arguments by Ms. Maxwell to keep materials sealed were dismissed. The document also mentions a specific instance where Ms. Maxwell's motion to stay discovery in a related case, 'Farmer v. Indyke', was opposed by attorneys representing both Ms. Giuffre and plaintiff Annie Farmer.
DOJ-OGR-00019400.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief filed on September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). It appeals a decision from the Southern District of New York (Case 20-CR-330) involving the United States of America. The document lists her legal representation as Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00019389.jpg
This is a Certificate of Compliance filed on September 16, 2020, for Case 20-3061. Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, representing the office of Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss for the Southern District of New York, certifies that a related motion/opposition filing complies with the word-count limits of federal appellate rules, stating it contains 5,099 words.
DOJ-OGR-00019366.jpg
This is a Certificate of Compliance filed on September 16, 2020, for Case 20-3061. It certifies that the associated motion/opposition contains 5,099 words, adhering to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and is signed by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey on behalf of Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00019345.jpg
This document is a 'Statement of Facts' from a legal filing dated September 16, 2020, concerning the case against Maxwell. It outlines the timeline of events in mid-2020, including the filing of a sealed indictment on June 29, Maxwell's arrest on July 2, and the filing of a superseding indictment on July 8 in the Southern District of New York. The document specifies the six counts Maxwell is charged with, all related to the enticement and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts.
DOJ-OGR-00019344.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing (Affirmation) dated September 16, 2020, submitted by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It supports the Government's motion to dismiss Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding a protective order in her criminal case (S1 20 Cr. 330). The document establishes Comey's credentials and outlines the procedural history regarding the District Court's September 2, 2020 order.
DOJ-OGR-00019343.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 16, 2020, by the United States of America in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). The motion, submitted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, seeks to dismiss Maxwell's appeal on the grounds of a lack of jurisdiction. The document identifies the legal representatives for both parties and confirms that the opposing counsel, Adam Mueller, has been notified and intends to file a response.
DOJ-OGR-00019338.jpg
This legal document, dated August 21, 2020, is a submission from the Acting United States Attorney and Assistant United States Attorneys to Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It argues against the defendant's application to use criminal discovery materials in civil cases, asserting that the application lacks legal justification, attempts to circumvent a protective order, and is irrelevant to the civil litigation. The document suggests the defendant's intent is to falsely accuse the Government and another party.
DOJ-OGR-00019336.jpg
This document is page 3 of a letter from the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (referenced as 'the defendant'). The Government argues against modifying a protective order, stating that the defendant should not be allowed to use materials from criminal discovery in her various civil cases, as this would violate witness privacy and jeopardize an 'active' ongoing grand jury investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators. The text highlights that the same defense counsel represents the defendant in both civil and criminal matters, raising concerns about the inappropriate use of confidential discovery materials to defend against abuse accusations by civil plaintiffs.
DOJ-OGR-00019328.jpg
A Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on September 2, 2020. The order addresses Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order to allow her to file discovery materials in civil cases under seal. The Judge approves the Government's proposed redactions to the motion filings, citing the need to protect an ongoing grand jury investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity