SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00021546.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The hearing took place on June 28, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00021530.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order (Document 620) filed on February 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text discusses the legal standards required to hold a 'McDonough hearing' regarding juror nondisclosure, citing Second Circuit precedents that set a high bar for post-verdict inquiries to prevent juror harassment and 'fishing expeditions.' The court notes that the Defendant (Maxwell) argues against this standard but fails to provide an alternative.
DOJ-OGR-00021527.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing post-trial motions regarding 'Juror 50'. It discusses the juror's media interviews where he admitted to being a sexual abuse victim despite checking 'no' on his questionnaire, prompting the Defendant to file for a new trial on January 19, 2022. The document also details a phone call on January 5, 2022, where Juror 50 contacted the Jury Department seeking guidance and access to his questionnaire, which was denied.
DOJ-OGR-00021525.jpg
This is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged that a juror (Juror 50) lied during jury selection. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on the questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00021431.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically Volume II of a Supplemental Appendix, in the appeal case of Ghislaine Maxwell versus the United States of America. The case, docket number 22-1426, is before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and was filed on June 29, 2023. The filing was submitted by Damian Williams, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of the government.
DOJ-OGR-00021173.jpg
This is the cover page for Volume I of the Supplemental Appendix filed on June 29, 2023, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It lists the parties involved, specifically the United States as Appellee and Ghislaine Maxwell as Defendant-Appellant, and identifies Damian Williams as the US Attorney representing the government.
DOJ-OGR-00021172.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 7, 2023, from Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York to Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, the Clerk of Court for the Second Circuit. Rohrbach formally notifies the court that he is leaving his position at the U.S. Attorney's Office and requests to be removed as counsel of record for the prosecution in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426-cr).
DOJ-OGR-00021170.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed in Case 22-1426 on April 26, 2023. Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew A. Rohrbach, on behalf of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, certifies that a related motion complies with the court's word count limitations, stating it contains 1135 words.
DOJ-OGR-00021165.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing from April 26, 2023, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal (Case 22-1426). It summarizes the procedural history, noting her conviction on June 29, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Paragraph 4 details the eight counts of the Superseding Indictment filed in March 2021, which include conspiracy, enticement of minors, sex trafficking of minors, and perjury.
DOJ-OGR-00021164.jpg
This legal document is an affirmation filed on April 26, 2023, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew A. Rohrbach in the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. The U.S. Government is requesting permission from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to file an oversized brief of up to 20,000 words to adequately respond to Maxwell's brief. The government also requests a 30-day extension for this filing, moving the deadline from May 30, 2023, to June 29, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00021163.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 26, 2023, by the U.S. government in the appeal of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The government requests permission to file an oversized brief of up to 20,000 words and a 30-day extension of time to file it, proposing a new deadline of June 29, 2023. This would consequently extend the deadline for Ghislaine Maxwell's reply brief to July 27, 2023. The motion is noted as being unopposed by Maxwell's counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00021161.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to the Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The letter, dated March 13, 2023, concerns the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, advising the court that the government intends to file its appeal brief by May 30, 2023, and also requests permission to file a supplemental appendix.
DOJ-OGR-00019615.jpg
This legal document, dated October 2, 2020, outlines a series of events in a criminal case against a defendant named Maxwell. It details that on July 30, 2020, Judge Nathan issued a protective order preventing criminal discovery materials from being used in civil litigation, and on September 2, 2020, denied Maxwell's motion to modify this order. Consequently, Maxwell filed a notice of appeal on September 4, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00019614.jpg
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States of America in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). The brief's preliminary statement outlines that Maxwell is appealing a September 2, 2020 order from the Southern District of New York which denied her motion to modify a protective order. It also summarizes the superseding indictment filed on July 8, 2020, which charges Maxwell with assisting Jeffrey Epstein in the sexual exploitation of minors between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00019612.jpg
This document appears to be page 5 (labeled Roman numeral iv) of a legal brief or filing related to Case 20-3061, filed on October 2, 2020. It is a Table of Authorities listing various legal precedents (case law) cited in the main document, including United States v. Caparros and United States v. Kerik. The footer indicates it is part of a Department of Justice (DOJ-OGR) release.
DOJ-OGR-00019592.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing from September 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061) before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to dismiss her appeal, submitted by her attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. The appeal originates from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019580.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on September 3, 2020, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is appealing the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York's decision from September 2, 2020, which denied her motion to modify a protective order. The notice cites several legal precedents to argue that the denial is immediately appealable.
DOJ-OGR-00019558.jpg
On September 2, 2020, Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell regarding a motion Maxwell filed to modify a protective order. The Judge approved the Government's proposed redactions to Maxwell's earlier motion, citing the need to protect an ongoing grand jury investigation. The parties were ordered to meet and confer regarding further redactions by September 4, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00019557.jpg
This document is the final page (page 4) of a legal filing dated August 21, 2020, submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Maxwell). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz, requests a date approximately 180 days later to update the Court on its position regarding the sealing of materials. The document indicates copies were sent to all counsel of record by email.
DOJ-OGR-00019553.jpg
This is page 5 of a legal letter filed on August 21, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz, argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate Civil Cases should be denied. The Government asserts this is an attempt to bypass protective orders and falsely accuse the Government and an unnamed 'Recipient' of malfeasance.
DOJ-OGR-00019551.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a letter from the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020, arguing against modifying a protective order. The Government asserts that the defendant (implied Ghislaine Maxwell) should not be allowed to use materials from criminal discovery in her civil cases, citing witness privacy and an active, ongoing grand jury investigation into co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein. The text emphasizes that defense counsel represents the defendant in both criminal and civil matters and warns against 'cherry-picking' confidential materials to defend against abuse accusations.
DOJ-OGR-00019548.jpg
This is a court order issued by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 30, 2020. The order grants the Government's proposed protective order concerning discovery materials, finding the Defense's arguments against the restrictions to be unwarranted and unprecedented. The ruling resolves docket item number 29 in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00019534.jpg
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, the order aims to protect sensitive, confidential, and personal information that the government intends to provide to the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, during the discovery process. The order is intended to prevent premature disclosure that could affect individual privacy, impede the ongoing investigation, or cause prejudicial pretrial publicity.
DOJ-OGR-00019522.jpg
This is the first page of a Proposed Protective Order filed on July 28, 2020, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan, outlines the Government's intent to produce discovery materials to the defense while restricting their public dissemination to protect ongoing investigations, privacy, and prevent prejudicial publicity.
DOJ-OGR-00019521.jpg
This legal document, dated July 28, 2020, is a filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution argues against a defendant's motion to impose restrictions on the government and third parties, labeling the request as unprecedented and without legal basis. The government urges the court to deny the defendant's motion and instead implement the government's own proposed protective order.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity