SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00016694.jpg
This page is a transcript from the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran. The witness confirms retrieving 'person encounter lists' (border crossing records) from the TECS system regarding three individuals: Jane, Kate, and Annie Farmer, which were generated on December 14, 2021. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, successfully moves to admit these records as Exhibit MA1 under seal to protect the privacy of the witnesses testifying under pseudonyms.
DOJ-OGR-00016683.jpg
This document is page 200 of a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran, who is testifying about the technical procedures of flight manifests, the APIS system, and how traveler information is populated into the TECS system by Customs and Border Protection.
DOJ-OGR-00016674.jpg
This document is page 191 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (US v. Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the swearing-in and commencement of the direct examination of defense witness Michael William Aznaran by attorney Mr. Everdell. Before questioning begins, there is a brief procedural discussion regarding the timing of a sidebar to address a government objection to a forthcoming exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00016660.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts the cross-examination of defense expert witness Elizabeth Loftus by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding 'Government Exhibit 1511,' a study on false memories. The questioning focuses on a specific experiment where 16% of participants falsely recalled meeting Bugs Bunny at Disney.
DOJ-OGR-00016654.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of defense expert witness Elizabeth Loftus during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz questions Loftus about her history of testifying for high-profile defendants, her interactions with the press, the potential business benefits of such testimony, and clarifies that her work is research-based rather than clinical. The text mentions Loftus's book, 'Witness for the Defense'.
DOJ-OGR-00016642.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of Professor Loftus during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Pomerantz questions Loftus, establishing her background as a researcher and consultant who has worked with defense attorneys in criminal cases hundreds of times. The page marks the transition from direct examination by Ms. Sternheim to cross-examination by Ms. Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00016640.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of expert witness Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus), who is testifying about the science of memory, specifically addressing how post-event information, personal motives, and the trustworthiness of information sources can influence the creation of false memories. The witness confirms that people are more likely to accept suggestive information if it fits their prior beliefs or comes from a trusted source.
DOJ-OGR-00016637.jpg
This document is page 154 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination testimony of an expert witness named Loftus regarding memory science. Loftus explains the concepts of 'confidence malleability' and 'prestige enhancing memory distortion,' describing how humans often inaccurately remember themselves in a more positive light without intending to lie.
DOJ-OGR-00016634.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Sternheim and Rohrbach argue before the Judge regarding the admissibility of a statement allegedly made by 'Kate' claiming the case against Maxwell was strengthening because accusers were 'strengthening their stories.' The prosecution argues against its admission as an inconsistent statement because Kate was not challenged on it during cross-examination, while the defense appears to argue for its admission under a bias framework.
DOJ-OGR-00016624.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Attorneys Menninger, Comey, and Pagliuca discuss scheduling and stipulations regarding 'prior inconsistent statements' found in FBI 302 reports for witnesses identified as Carolyn, Jane, and Annie. The court focuses on resolving issues related to 'Carolyn' immediately as she is an out-of-state witness present to testify that afternoon.
DOJ-OGR-00016615.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct testimony of expert witness Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, questioned by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, regarding the fallibility and constructive nature of human memory. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz successfully objects to a leading question posed by the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00016614.jpg
This document is page 131 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus) by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. The testimony focuses on the concepts of the 'forgetting curve' and 'post-event information,' with several objections raised by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding leading questions and witness commentary.
DOJ-OGR-00016612.jpg
This document is page 129 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. The text features direct examination testimony from a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus) discussing the suggestiveness of psychotherapy, the creation of false memories through recovered memory therapy, and the psychological concept of 'labeling' altering perception of ambiguous stimuli.
DOJ-OGR-00016608.jpg
This document is page 125 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the psychology of memory, specifically the 'retention stage,' and how 'post-event suggestion' and misinformation can contaminate, alter, or distort a witness's memory over time.
DOJ-OGR-00016606.jpg
This document is page 123 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the stages of memory, specifically describing the 'retention stage' and various 'acts of retrieval' such as discussing an event with others, police questioning, and identifications.
DOJ-OGR-00016604.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim requests permission for expert witness Professor Loftus to use courtroom monitors as a whiteboard to demonstrate the stages of memory to the jury. After the prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) raises no objection and the Judge approves, Professor Loftus begins testifying about the 'acquisition stage' of memory.
DOJ-OGR-00016603.jpg
This document is a page from the trial transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim examines Professor Elizabeth Loftus, successfully proffering her as an expert witness in memory science despite objections from prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. Loftus begins her testimony by explaining to the jury that human memory does not function like a recording device but is a complex reconstruction process.
DOJ-OGR-00016596.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the 'misinformation effect' in memory science, describing experiments where witnesses to simulated accidents incorporate false post-event information (such as a yield sign replacing a stop sign) into their memories, rendering them inaccurate.
DOJ-OGR-00016595.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on establishing her credentials as a psychologist in the field of memory science, detailing her career since receiving her Ph.D. in 1970, including publishing over 20 books and 600 scientific articles. The document is stamped with DOJ-OGR-00016595.
DOJ-OGR-00016593.jpg
This document is page 110 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus, who is explaining the scientific peer-review process and confirming their experience serving on editorial boards for psychology journals. The document includes standard court headers, line numbers, and a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00016574.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the testimony of a witness named Espinosa, who states under questioning by Mr. Everdell that during her six years working for Ghislaine Maxwell, she never saw Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein engage in inappropriate activity with underage girls. Following this testimony, Mr. Everdell concludes his questioning, and Ms. Pomerantz begins her cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00016554.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. The witness, Espinosa (referred to as 'Cimberly' in the exhibits), is testifying about photographs and inscriptions received from an individual referred to as 'Jane.' The exhibits (CE4-CE8) include a signed note thanking Cimberly for her help and photos of a soap opera cast where 'Jane' was employed.
DOJ-OGR-00016550.jpg
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell questions witness Ms. Espinosa regarding exhibits CE3 through CE8, which the witness identifies as headshots of cast members and a group shot she had held onto for many years.
DOJ-OGR-00016543.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, Espinosa, testifies about Epstein giving 'Lion King' tickets to almost all employees and confirms that Epstein received female visitors at his office. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell requests to display Government Exhibit 12, which is under seal, only to the Court, the deputy, and the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016514.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures a brief exchange between the Marshal, Mr. Pagliuca, and the Court regarding readiness for an unidentified female individual waiting outside, concluding with the Judge's order to bring in the jury.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity