| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | N/A | Second Circuit Court of Appeals issues opinion in United States v. Boustani | New York | View |
| 2019-03-07 | Legal case | United States v. Boustani, where the defendant was ordered detained pending trial due to risk of ... | E.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2019-03-07 | Legal case | United States v. Boustani, 356 F. Supp. 3d 246 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d, No. 19-344, 2019 WL 2070656 (2d... | Eastern District of New York | View |
| 2019-03-07 | Court ruling | In United States v. Boustani, the defendant was ordered detained pending trial due to risk of fli... | E.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2019-03-07 | N/A | United States v. Boustani ruling affirmed | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2019-03-07 | N/A | United States v. Boustani decision affirmed | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal case | Decision in the case of United States v. Boustani. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Boustani, 932 F.3d 79. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal ruling | Ruling in the case of United States v. Boustani. | E.D.N.Y. | View |
This legal document is a filing arguing against a defendant's proposed bail package. The central argument is that the assets securing the bond, held by the defendant's spouse, were originally funneled from the defendant herself, meaning the spouse would not lose his own money if she were to flee. This, combined with the defendant's considerable financial resources, foreign ties, and legal precedent against a 'two-tiered' bail system, supports the position that she should remain in detention as a flight risk.
This page from a legal document details a court's decision to detain a defendant before trial, finding that electronic monitoring would be insufficient and dismissing concerns about COVID-19 risks. The document then outlines the applicable legal standard under the Bail Reform Act, explaining the government's burden to prove the defendant is a flight risk and the factors a court must consider.
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing entitled 'Table of Authorities' from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 18, 2020. It lists numerous legal precedents cited in the filing, primarily 'United States v. [Defendant]' cases. Notably, the list includes two citations for 'United States v. Epstein' (one from 2001 in E.D. Pa. and one from 2019 in S.D.N.Y.) and one for 'United States v. Madoff'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity