Isidro M. Garcia
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
plaintiff
|
Counsel for plaintiff |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
plaintiff
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
plaintiff
|
Counsel for |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-07-02 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff's Counsel's Response to Court's Order to Show Cause | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-07-14 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Kellen's Motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2008-09-18 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time | Southern District of Florida | View |
055.pdf
This document is a Motion for Protective Order filed on November 9, 2009, by Igor Zinoviev, a third-party witness and Jeffrey Epstein's driver/bodyguard since November 2005. Zinoviev seeks to prevent or limit his deposition, arguing he has no knowledge relevant to the civil cases as his employment with Epstein began after the alleged events, and he has not discussed Epstein's criminal or civil cases with him. The motion cites legal precedents on the scope of discovery and includes a list of attorneys involved in various related cases.
082.pdf
This document is a Reply filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in November 2009 requesting a permanent order for the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), which was undergoing restructuring. The filing highlights that the Department of Justice had seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including about 13 boxes related to Epstein cases, amidst concerns of 'serious ethical and potentially criminal issues' at the firm. The document also argues against delaying the deposition of RRA's Chief Restructuring Officer, Herbert Stettin, citing upcoming trial deadlines.
080.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, requesting a protective order to prevent his deposition in the case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, who worked as a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, argues he has no relevant information for the civil cases as his employment began after the alleged events and he never discussed the criminal or civil cases with Epstein.
064.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Compliance' filed on July 28, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It pertains to multiple civil cases filed by 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs against Epstein. The filing states that while the court ordered the parties to agree on a preservation of evidence order, they were unable to reach a full agreement, leading Epstein to submit his own proposed order. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and defendants, including Sarah Kellen.
EFTA00023624.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Notice of Serving Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories in a 2009 civil case against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff, whose name is redacted, details her residence history and her interactions with Epstein between 2002 and 2003, stating she visited his Florida home roughly twice a week to provide massages after being introduced by a friend. The document reveals she recruited other females for Epstein in exchange for payment, used drugs (Morning Glory, Angel Trumpets, cocaine, marijuana) during the relevant period, and lists various legal counsel and law enforcement entities involved in the investigation.
EFTA00009933.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 2019 between attorney Isidro Garcia and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The SDNY prosecutor requests a meeting with Garcia's client (whose name is redacted) to discuss her recollections of Epstein's conduct and asks that she bring specific physical evidence, including old mobile phones, photos, and gifts from that time period. The prosecutor specifically requests photos of the client from the time she knew Epstein to establish a record of her appearance for legal reasons, while emphasizing a desire to avoid re-victimizing her.
DOJ-OGR-00030279.tif
This document is a page from a court filing, Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, dated September 17, 2009, listing multiple attorneys and their respective law firms, contact information, and the specific related cases they represent plaintiffs in. It details legal counsel for various plaintiffs, including 'Jane Doe' and 'C.M.A.', across several related case numbers, providing contact details for each attorney and their firm.
Service of Response to Order to Show Cause
Service of legal filing via electronic transmission
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant ...
Service of legal memorandum via electronic case management system.
Service of Motion for Default
Certificate of service for the motion
Enlargement of time
Counsel consulted regarding extension of time to file reply; Critton did not oppose.
Service of Motion
Service of the Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity