DOJ-OGR-00020543.jpg
1.39 MB
Extraction Summary
9
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court docket / legal case log
File Size:
1.39 MB
Summary
This document is a court docket sheet from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries on November 8 and 9, 2021. It details various pre-trial motions and orders, including the denial of a renewed bail request, the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (evidence of sexual behavior) and expert witnesses (Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus), and orders regarding the humane transport of the defendant and delivery of legal mail. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs) and the Judge, as well as filings by the defense counsel.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Presiding judge issuing orders and receiving letters.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the legal proceedings, bail requests, and motions.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Prosecutor submitting letters and motions on behalf of the USA.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Prosecutor submitting letters and motions on behalf of the USA.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Prosecutor submitting letters and motions on behalf of the USA.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Prosecutor submitting letters and motions on behalf of the USA.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Submitting letters on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Dr. Dietz | Expert Witness |
Subject of a motion by the USA to preclude expert testimony.
|
| Dr. Loftus | Expert Witness |
Subject of a motion by the USA to preclude expert testimony.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USA |
United States of America / Government / Prosecution
|
|
| MDC |
Metropolitan Detention Center (legal counsel mentioned regarding mail and transport)
|
|
| BOP |
Bureau of Prisons (security protocols discussed)
|
|
| Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
Cited in case law (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Metropolitan Detention Center (implied detention location)
|
|
|
Destination for defendant transport
|
Relationships (2)
LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Bobbi C. Sternheim
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell... Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan
Key Quotes (4)
"the renewed request for bail is denied."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020543.jpg
Quote #1
"the Court concludes that she will be transported to and from the courthouse for pretrial conferences and trial in a way that is humane, proper, and consistent with security protocols."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020543.jpg
Quote #2
"MDC legal counsel and the Government are ordered to take the steps outlined in the Dkt. No. 422 between now and the completion of trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020543.jpg
Quote #3
"anticipated witness could be deemed a victim of any of the crimes charged in the indictment for any legal purpose, including for purposes of restitution"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020543.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (4,651 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page57 of 92
ORDERED to file a supplemental letter responsive to the Court's question on or before
12:00 p.m. on November 7, 2021. For the sake of clarity, the Government is directed
to state its position as to whether this anticipated witness could be deemed a victim of
any of the crimes charged in the indictment for any legal purpose, including for
purposes of restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2). SO ORDERED. (Signed by
Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/6/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
12:00 p.m. on November 7, 2021. For the sake of clarity, the Government is directed
to state its position as to whether this anticipated witness could be deemed a victim of
any of the crimes charged in the indictment for any legal purpose, including for
purposes of restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2). SO ORDERED. (Signed by
Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/6/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/2021 418 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 8, 2021 re: Dkt. No. 406 Ex. A Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1
Exhibit Exhibit A)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 8, 2021 re: Dkt. No. 406 Ex. A Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1
Exhibit Exhibit A)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/2021 419 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C.
Sternheim dated 11/8/2021 re: Suggestions to Dkt 404 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered:
11/08/2021)
Sternheim dated 11/8/2021 re: Suggestions to Dkt 404 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered:
11/08/2021)
11/08/2021 420 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 8, 2021 re: the Court's draft preliminary remarks for voir dire (Dkt. 404)
Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 8, 2021 re: the Court's draft preliminary remarks for voir dire (Dkt. 404)
Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/2021 421 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: A conference is scheduled for November 10, 2021
to address the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, Dkt. No. 378,
the Defendant's motion in limine to exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Dkt. No. 386, and
the other outstanding issues that overlap with these two motions as discussed at the
November 1, 2021 conference. Dkt. No. 409. The parties are ORDERED to confirm
by 12:00 p.m. tomorrow, November 9, 2021, that the alleged victims referenced in the
Defendant's Rule 412 Motion have been notified of the November 10 hearing and of
their right to attend. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/8/2021)
(lnl) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
to address the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, Dkt. No. 378,
the Defendant's motion in limine to exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Dkt. No. 386, and
the other outstanding issues that overlap with these two motions as discussed at the
November 1, 2021 conference. Dkt. No. 409. The parties are ORDERED to confirm
by 12:00 p.m. tomorrow, November 9, 2021, that the alleged victims referenced in the
Defendant's Rule 412 Motion have been notified of the November 10 hearing and of
their right to attend. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/8/2021)
(lnl) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/2021 422 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 8, 2021 re: Delivery of Legal Mail (Dkt. 412) Document filed by USA.
(Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 8, 2021 re: Delivery of Legal Mail (Dkt. 412) Document filed by USA.
(Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/2021 423 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 8, 2021 re: Opposition to Motion for Bail Reconsideration Document filed
by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
November 8, 2021 re: Opposition to Motion for Bail Reconsideration Document filed
by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/08/2021 424 MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Document filed
by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3
Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3
Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/08/2021)
11/09/2021 425 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 422 LETTER by USA as to
Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene
Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 8, 2021
re: Delivery of Legal Mail (Dkt. 412). ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by
Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/9/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/09/2021)
Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene
Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 8, 2021
re: Delivery of Legal Mail (Dkt. 412). ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by
Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/9/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/09/2021)
11/09/2021 426 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's motion
for reconsideration regarding release on bond, Dkt. No. 408, and the parties' letters
regarding the delivery of the Defendant's legal mail and transport to the courthouse for
pretrial conferences and trial in this case, Dkt. Nos. 381, 403, 422. For the reasons
stated in this Court's prior bail determinations, Dkt. Nos. 93, 106, 169, and the
Government's letter in opposition, Dkt. No. 423, the renewed request for bail is denied.
Moreover, based on the representations from MDC legal counsel regarding the
delivery of the Defendant's legal mail, Dkt. No. 422, the Court concludes that the
Defendant has adequate access to legal counsel and legal mail in order to prepare for
trial. MDC legal counsel and the Government are ordered to take the steps outlined in
the Dkt. No. 422 between now and the completion of trial. As to the Defendant's
transport, the Court concludes that she will be transported to and from the courthouse
for pretrial conferences and trial in a way that is humane, proper, and consistent with
security protocols. This conclusion is based on representations from MDC legal
counsel in the letter submitted under seal because it discusses BOP security protocols,
for reconsideration regarding release on bond, Dkt. No. 408, and the parties' letters
regarding the delivery of the Defendant's legal mail and transport to the courthouse for
pretrial conferences and trial in this case, Dkt. Nos. 381, 403, 422. For the reasons
stated in this Court's prior bail determinations, Dkt. Nos. 93, 106, 169, and the
Government's letter in opposition, Dkt. No. 423, the renewed request for bail is denied.
Moreover, based on the representations from MDC legal counsel regarding the
delivery of the Defendant's legal mail, Dkt. No. 422, the Court concludes that the
Defendant has adequate access to legal counsel and legal mail in order to prepare for
trial. MDC legal counsel and the Government are ordered to take the steps outlined in
the Dkt. No. 422 between now and the completion of trial. As to the Defendant's
transport, the Court concludes that she will be transported to and from the courthouse
for pretrial conferences and trial in a way that is humane, proper, and consistent with
security protocols. This conclusion is based on representations from MDC legal
counsel in the letter submitted under seal because it discusses BOP security protocols,
DOJ-OGR-00020543
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document