| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Parse
|
Prosecutor vs defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Eric Holder
|
Subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Morgenthau
|
Professional comparison |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Chuck
|
Professional political connection |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Chuck
|
Political professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-11 | N/A | Firing of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara by Donald Trump (implied by 'this weekend' in article dated... | USA | View |
| 2017-03-01 | N/A | Preet Bharara fired by President Trump. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2017-03-01 | N/A | Donald Trump fired Preet Bharara. | Washington D.C. / New York | View |
| 2016-11-01 | N/A | Preet Bharara at Trump Tower | Trump Tower, New York | View |
| 2013-03-18 | N/A | Filing of Amended Sentencing Memorandum regarding David Parse | SDNY | View |
| 2012-10-12 | Court proceeding | A court proceeding for the case United States of America v. David K. Parse, case number 09 CR 581... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | President Obama appoints Preet Bharara. | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is Exhibit 1 filed in the case USVI v. JPMorgan Chase (related to Jeffrey Epstein), but the content is the January 2014 Deferred Prosecution Agreement between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and JPMorgan Chase regarding the Madoff Ponzi scheme. JPMorgan admitted to violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, specifically failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and failing to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) in the U.S. despite having suspicions about Madoff's returns. The bank agreed to forfeit $1.7 billion to the United States.
An email chain between redacted USANYS officials from February 11, 2021, discussing media inquiries (specifically from Bloomberg) regarding a Law360 article titled '3 Names To Watch As Biden Mulls Next SDNY Top Prosecutor'. The forwarded article discusses potential successors to U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, explicitly mentioning her office's prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell as a significant recent high-profile case. The article profiles candidates Damian Williams, Katherine Goldstein, and Anjan Sahni.
This document is an email chain between USANYS employees discussing and forwarding a Law360 article dated February 10, 2021. The article discusses the Biden administration's process for selecting the next U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, mentioning current U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss's high-profile cases against Ghislaine Maxwell and Peter Nygard. The email correspondence also notes that Bloomberg has been making inquiries to the USANYS staff regarding this topic.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 2020, discussing a press inquiry from the NY Daily News. The reporter, Stephen Rex Brown, provides details of a story alleging that in 2016, SDNY prosecutors (specifically an AUSA named Kramer) met with victims' lawyers but declined to pursue new charges against Jeffrey Epstein or perjury charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The internal SDNY response suggests they have no record of the second meeting mentioned and decide not to push back against the story.
This is an email from former prosecutor Peter Brightbill to a redacted recipient (likely a federal prosecutor), dated July 2, 2020. Brightbill congratulates the team on Ghislaine Maxwell's indictment but warns that the MCC is insecure, explicitly stating his belief that Jeffrey Epstein's death was a homicide. He urges the prosecution to ensure Maxwell is monitored 24/7 by Federal Marshals to prevent a similar outcome.
This document is the cover page for an Amended Sentencing Memorandum filed on March 18, 2013, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Preet Bharara) regarding defendant David Parse. The case (S3 09 Cr. 581) involves multiple defendants including Paul Daugerdas, Donna Guerin, and Denis Field. The document also bears markings indicating it was later filed as Exhibit A-6074 in a 2020 civil case (1:20-cv-00338-AJN) on August 24, 2022.
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from a proceeding on October 12, 2012, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. David K. Parse, with Judge William H. Pauley III presiding. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, and the defense, represented by Paul Shechtman of Zuckerman Spaeder.
This document is the cover page for an Amended Sentencing Memorandum filed by the United States (via US Attorney Preet Bharara) regarding defendant David Parse in the case *United States v. Paul Daugerdas, et al.* (S3 09 Cr. 581). Originally filed on March 18, 2013, this specific copy was submitted as Exhibit A-6074 on February 24, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), likely as legal precedent or background material.
This document is a page from a larger report (identified by the House Oversight footer) analyzing the tenure of Preet Bharara at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It criticizes the office for failing to prosecute individual banking executives following the 2008 financial crisis, noting that while firms like SAC Capital and JPMorgan Chase faced fines or pleas, individuals (with the exception of Kareem Serageldin) generally avoided criminal charges. The text discusses the jurisdictional habits of the SDNY and its handling of cases related to the Madoff Ponzi scheme and mortgage-backed securities.
This document appears to be an article or report excerpt (marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp) comparing the prosecutorial styles of Robert Morgenthau and Preet Bharara. It details Bharara's firing by President Trump in March 2017, his record of prosecuting NY politicians like Sheldon Silver and Dean Skelos, and critiques his focus on hedge fund insider trading over systemic Wall Street bank abuses. The text highlights the tension between political corruption investigations and executive power.
On March 13, 2017, Kathy Ruemmler sent an email with 'High' importance to Jeffrey Epstein (via jeevacation@gmail.com) containing the full text of a ProPublica article titled 'When It Comes to Wall Street, Preet Bharara Is No Hero.' The article discusses the recent firing of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara by Donald Trump, criticizing Bharara's record on Wall Street crime while drawing historical parallels to Robert Morgenthau's refusal to resign under Nixon and his prosecution of Roy Cohn (Donald Trump's former mentor).
This document is an email chain from October 24, 2014, in which former White House Counsel Kathy Ruemmler forwards an Associated Press article to Jeffrey Epstein (via jeevacation@gmail.com). The article, written by Nedra Pickler, details Ruemmler's decision to withdraw her name from consideration as U.S. Attorney General to replace Eric Holder, citing concerns over a difficult confirmation process. Ruemmler marks the email to Epstein as 'High' importance.
This document is an excerpt from Michael Wolff's book 'Siege' (stamped as a House Oversight exhibit) detailing the legal threats facing the Trump Organization from the Mueller investigation and the SDNY. It describes Jared Kushner warning President Trump that prosecutors might use RICO laws—pioneered by Trump's friend Rudy Giuliani—to treat his business as a criminal enterprise and seize assets like Trump Tower. The text also recounts a grand jury testimony where a witness revealed that Donald Trump personally signed all Trump Organization checks and was questioned about ties to Mafia members in Atlantic City.
I know what the Moreland Commission must have felt like
An 'unseemly meeting' that was unsatisfactory; Bharara was unwilling to humor Trump.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity