Eric Holder
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jon Kyl
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jon Kyl
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jon Kyl
|
Attempted correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jon Kyl
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Preet Bharara
|
Subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President of Mexico
|
Political pressure |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | National Action Network's 13th Annual Convention | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Summit | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Press Conference establishing trafficking as a priority | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Founding of See Forever Foundation | Washington D.C. / Maryland | View |
| 2011-11-02 | Communication | U.S. Senator Jon Kyl sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder criticizing the 2011 Guideline... | N/A | View |
| 2011-06-06 | N/A | Senator Kyl sent a letter to Attorney General Holder complaining about OLC's distortion of his re... | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2011-06-06 | N/A | Senator Kyl sent a letter to AG Holder complaining about OLC's distortion of legislative history. | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Proposition 19 vote regarding marijuana legalization. | California | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Attorney General Eric Holder issued a memo regarding medical marijuana raids. | USA | View |
020.pdf
Transcript of the initial appearance and arraignment of Jeffrey Epstein on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The government argues for pretrial detention, citing extreme flight risk due to wealth/private jets and danger to the community based on evidence found in his home (photos of minors) and potential witness tampering. The defense pleads not guilty, argues the conduct is 'ancient' (2002-2005), and claims a 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement covers the conduct; a full detention hearing is scheduled for July 11.
EFTA00031093.pdf
An internal email from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 6, 2020, containing a digest of press clippings. The email highlights an article about BNP Paribas being subpoenaed to trace Jeffrey Epstein's funds, alongside other legal and political news involving figures like William Barr, Wayne LaPierre, and issues surrounding the NYPD and the 2020 election.
DOJ-OGR-00000422.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on July 16, 2019, concerning a bond hearing. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten argues that while there may have been prostitution, there was no violence, coercion, or trafficking involved. The Judge (The Court) counters this argument by noting that if the women involved were under 18, they were legally incapable of consent, making the acts rape.
DOJ-OGR-00021443.jpg
This legal document details the Department of Justice's (DOJ) process of interpreting and revising the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) guidelines between 2010 and 2011. The central issue was the point at which victims' rights become active, with the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) maintaining that rights only vest after formal criminal charges are filed. This position was challenged in a November 2011 letter by CVRA co-sponsor Senator Jon Kyl, who argued to Attorney General Eric Holder that the DOJ's 2011 revised guidelines conflicted with the law's plain language by not extending rights to victims before charges were filed.
DOJ-OGR-00023279.jpg
This document is page 241 of a DOJ report discussing the legal interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) between 2010 and 2011. It details the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) determination that victim rights do not 'vest' until formal criminal charges are filed, a stance maintained in the 2011 Guidelines revision despite Senator Jon Kyl's argument that this conflicted with the Act's plain language. The text highlights the friction between internal DOJ policy regarding pre-indictment plea negotiations and the legislative intent of the CVRA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019847.jpg
This document is a page from a larger report (identified by the House Oversight footer) analyzing the tenure of Preet Bharara at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It criticizes the office for failing to prosecute individual banking executives following the 2008 financial crisis, noting that while firms like SAC Capital and JPMorgan Chase faced fines or pleas, individuals (with the exception of Kareem Serageldin) generally avoided criminal charges. The text discusses the jurisdictional habits of the SDNY and its handling of cases related to the Madoff Ponzi scheme and mortgage-backed securities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026605.jpg
This document is an email chain from October 24, 2014, in which former White House Counsel Kathy Ruemmler forwards an Associated Press article to Jeffrey Epstein (via jeevacation@gmail.com). The article, written by Nedra Pickler, details Ruemmler's decision to withdraw her name from consideration as U.S. Attorney General to replace Eric Holder, citing concerns over a difficult confirmation process. Ruemmler marks the email to Epstein as 'High' importance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026494.jpg
This document is a page from a House Oversight report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026494) arguing that the 'Crossfire' (Crossfire Hurricane) investigation into the Trump campaign was politically motivated rather than based on national security. It cites a 2012 Eric Holder memo regarding DOJ impartiality during election years and contrasts the handling of the Clinton email server investigation with the Trump-Russia probe. It asserts there was no discernible evidence of collusion when Crossfire was launched and notes that the Clinton campaign funded the Steele dossier.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026487.jpg
This document, originating from House Oversight records, argues that the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign was politically motivated and lacked evidence of collusion at its inception. It contrasts the handling of the Trump investigation with the Clinton email investigation and highlights financial ties between the Clinton sphere (Foundation, Podesta Group) and Russian entities. It references a 2012 Eric Holder memo regarding DOJ impartiality during election years to support the argument that the investigation violated standard protocol.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026480.jpg
This document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, argues against the legitimacy of the 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign. It contends that the investigation violated Justice Department norms regarding election-year impartiality and asserts there was no evidence of collusion when the probe began. The text contrasts the scrutiny of the Trump campaign with the activities of the Clinton campaign (funding the Steele dossier) and the Podesta Group's ties to Russian entities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017620.jpg
This document is a page from a legal journal article (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) likely submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that the OLC ignored Senator Kyl's intent that victim rights apply before charges are filed. The text specifically cites the 'Epstein case' as a notable example where the OLC's interpretation allowed a non-prosecution agreement to nullify victims' rights to be heard.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017619.jpg
This document is a page from a legal text (likely a law journal or brief submitted by David Schoen) analyzing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues against the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) narrow interpretation that victims' rights only attach after charges are filed, citing a 2011 letter from Senator Jon Kyl to Attorney General Eric Holder where Kyl clarifies that rights were intended to exist pre-indictment. The text criticizes the OLC for deceptively quoting legislative history to support their position.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017605.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (Page 2 of 31) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and whether victim rights apply before formal charges are filed. It highlights a conflict between a 2010 DOJ OLC opinion, which argued rights do not attach pre-charging, and Senator Jon Kyl, who argued they do. The text specifically uses the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case in Florida as a concrete example of the controversy, noting that victims argued they should have been consulted regarding his non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023106.jpg
This document is page 5 of an interview (likely from The Litigation Daily) with high-profile defense attorney Reid Weingarten, dated September 8, 2015. Weingarten discusses his defense of Mike Espy, his close personal friendship with former AG Eric Holder, and their joint work establishing the 'See Forever Foundation' to assist juvenile offenders. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp, indicating it was included in materials produced to Congress, likely relevant due to Weingarten's role as Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney during the 2008 plea deal negotiations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015329.jpg
This document page, marked with a House Oversight footer, details political events from late 2010. It covers the legal battles and eventual Congressional repeal of the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy involving President Obama and Judge Virginia Phillips. Additionally, it outlines Attorney General Eric Holder's opposition to California's Proposition 19 (marijuana legalization) following pressure from DEA chiefs and the Mexican government.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015325.jpg
This document page, marked with a House Oversight footer, appears to be a transcript of a letter or speech criticizing political compromises in Washington. It addresses an unnamed leader (likely President Obama) regarding unfulfilled promises to stop medical marijuana raids, citing Attorney General Eric Holder's 2009 memo and subsequent raids in 2011. The text also draws parallels between drug policy reform and healthcare reform negotiations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013407.jpg
This document is page 2 of a printout from the website 'Main Justice' dated April 7, 2011. The specific article referenced in the header and URL ('Attorneys Say Miami Prosecutors Violated Crime Victims' Rights Act') relates to the controversy surrounding the non-prosecution agreement Jeffrey Epstein received from Miami prosecutors (Alexander Acosta's office), though the body text for that article is not visible on this page. The visible content consists primarily of sidebar links to Department of Justice news releases regarding various financial penalties, fraud cases, and speeches by Attorney General Eric Holder and Associate AG Tom Perrelli.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013406.jpg
This document is a printout of a 'Main Justice' news article from March 22, 2011, detailing a legal motion filed by attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys allege that the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by secretly signing a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein in September 2007 while sending false letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was still ongoing. The article includes a response from U.S. Attorney's Office Special Counsel Alicia Valle, who maintains that no federal charges were filed and declines further comment due to pending litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025932.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee production (ID: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025932). It contains the text of a forwarded email featuring a satirical, scripted dialogue between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The text lists numerous conservative grievances and scandals associated with the Obama/Clinton era, including Benghazi, Solyndra, the Iran Nuclear Deal, and the Uranium One deal. While the user requested 'Epstein-related' analysis, Jeffrey Epstein is not mentioned in the text of this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025917.jpg
An email document sent by Philip Kafka containing a forwarded political joke formatted as a dialogue between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The text lists various controversies associated with Clinton (IRS, Uranium One, White House furniture) and ends with commentary criticizing Democratic voters. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014062.jpg
This document page, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp, is an excerpt from a legal analysis (likely a law review article) criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that the OLC incorrectly concluded that victims' rights do not apply before an indictment is filed, contradicting the legislative intent of Senator Jon Kyl, a primary sponsor of the Act. The text highlights that even the OLC acknowledged their interpretation might contradict 'good practice' regarding pre-charging plea discussions, a critical legal issue relevant to the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement controversy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014061.jpg
This page from a legal publication (likely by Paul Cassell) critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that the OLC deceptively quoted Senator Jon Kyl to suggest victim rights only apply after charging. The text cites a June 6, 2011 letter from Senator Kyl to Attorney General Eric Holder where Kyl clarifies that the CVRA was intended to provide rights to victims even before an indictment is filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014040.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a law review article (dated roughly 2014) included in a House Oversight investigation. It discusses the legal interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on whether victims' rights apply before formal charges are filed. It highlights a 2010 DOJ Office of Legal Counsel opinion which argued rights do not attach during investigations, and notes that non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) allow prosecutors to avoid notifying victims—a key legal issue in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text mentions Senator Jon Kyl's objection to this DOJ interpretation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026283.jpg
This document, a page from a House Oversight report, argues that the 'Crossfire' investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia was politically motivated and lacked sufficient evidence. It contrasts this with the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server and alleges that the Clinton campaign and associated entities, such as The Podesta Group and the Clinton Foundation, had their own financial ties to Russian-linked interests. Contrary to the user's prompt, the document contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026275.jpg
This document, from a source labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', presents a legal argument that the special counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller was fundamentally tainted and a violation of due process. The author contends that the preceding FBI 'Crossfire' investigation was politically motivated, and this bias rendered all subsequent activities, including Mueller's appointment and findings, as 'fruit of a poisonous tree'. The text does not contain any information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; its entire focus is on the Mueller investigation and related legal precedents.
Proposition 19
Warned that the federal government would enforce laws against marijuana even if Prop 19 passed.
Importance of impartiality in an election year
A 2012 memo by then-Attorney General Eric Holder emphasizes that impartiality is 'particularly important in an election'.
Importance of impartiality in an election year
A 2012 memo by then-Attorney General Eric Holder emphasizes that impartiality is 'particularly important in an election'.
Importance of impartiality in an election year
A 2012 memo by then-Attorney General Eric Holder emphasizes that impartiality is 'particularly important in an election'.
Impartiality in investigations during an election year
A memo emphasizing that impartiality is 'particularly important in an election year' and that politics must not influence prosecutorial decisions.
Impartiality in investigations during an election year
A memo emphasizing that impartiality is 'particularly important in an election year' and that politics must not influence prosecutorial decisions.
Impartiality in election years
Politics must play no role in the decisions of federal prosecutors.
Election Year Sensitivities
Emphasizes that impartiality is particularly important in an election year and politics must play no role in investigative decisions.
Impartiality in investigations during an election year
A memo emphasizing that impartiality is 'particularly important in an election year' and that politics must not influence prosecutorial decisions.
2011 Guidelines revisions for the CVRA
Senator Jon Kyl sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder arguing that the 2011 Guidelines revisions conflicted with the CVRA's plain language because they did not extend rights to victims until after charges were filed.
Medical Marijuana Raids
Ordering an end to federal raids of medical marijuana dispensaries.
Medical Marijuana Raids
Ordering an end to federal raids of medical marijuana dispensaries.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity