| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Business associate |
29
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
organization
Department of
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Advisor correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US DIST COURT
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
USAO
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Parents of Recipient
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nikxx
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Inmate (Epstein)
|
Frequent communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Daddy's LiL' Girl
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted AUSA]
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Professional |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Friend |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Professional collaborative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Detective [Redacted]
|
Investigative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
associate warden
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Professional correspondence |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
USANYS-EpsteinVictims
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
SIGRID
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Scheduled appearance before the Grand Jury. | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Women's March | Unknown | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Court Appearance / Production of Documents | 40 Foley Square, Courtroom ... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Court Appearance / Testimony | 40 Foley Square, Courtroom ... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Court Appearance to testify and give evidence | 40 Foley Square, Courtroom ... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Court Appearance to testify | 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906 | View |
| 2021-10-12 | N/A | 7:30 call | Unknown | View |
| 2021-09-20 | N/A | Proposed phone call regarding the Epstein case investigation. | Phone Call | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | Proposed interview with the survivor. | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-25 | N/A | Read receipt generated for email correspondence regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case. | N/A | View |
| 2021-02-25 | N/A | Scheduled Grand Jury Appearance | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2021-02-17 | N/A | Investigative follow-up planning | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-29 | N/A | Scheduled Video Conference/Meeting | Virtual (Video Conference) | View |
| 2021-01-29 | N/A | Proposed Video Conference/Interview | Video Conference (New York ... | View |
| 2021-01-05 | N/A | Proposed Video Interview | Video (Remote) | View |
| 2020-08-24 | N/A | Phone call between a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Task Force and the recipient. | Remote (Phone) | View |
| 2020-08-24 | N/A | Proposed video conference between Detective and recipient. | Video Conference | View |
| 2020-08-24 | N/A | Proposed Video Conference with NYPD/FBI Task Force | Video Conference | View |
| 2020-08-10 | N/A | Oral Surgery (Recovery) | Unknown | View |
| 2020-08-10 | N/A | Call between sender and recipient discussing the production | Teleconference | View |
| 2020-08-10 | N/A | Recipient had oral surgery around this date. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-08-04 | N/A | Planned mailing of thumb drive containing evidence folders NYC024332, NYC024369, NYC024369_1, NYC... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | Conversation/Meeting referenced in email ('Pleasure talking with you on Friday'). | Unknown | View |
| 2020-07-16 | N/A | Proposed conference call regarding an update on the Epstein NY property. | Teleconference | View |
| 2020-07-01 | N/A | Transmission of an Amended GPS warrant via email. | Unknown | View |
An email sent late on August 10, 2019 (the date of Jeffrey Epstein's death), regarding a 'revised search warrant.' The sender, working with the FBI, attaches a revised application and exhibits (including a file named 'USVI_SW.v6.docx' suggesting a warrant for the US Virgin Islands). The email requests to 'swear out the warrant first thing in the morning.'
This document is an email chain from November 15, 2019, among likely DOJ/SDNY officials discussing a voicemail received from an attorney named David Hall (phone number 2022466629). The sender notes that the message 'relates to the Epstein case' and explains that Hall obtained their number through a mutual friend, a former AUSA in Cleveland, because Hall was seeking an SDNY contact. The recipient agrees to call Hall back.
This document is a subpoena issued on July 19, 2021, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It commands an unnamed individual to appear at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The subpoena was issued under the authority of US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
This document is an email dated July 19, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to a redacted recipient. The email serves to inform the recipient that a specific individual (redacted) is being subpoenaed to testify as a witness in a trial scheduled to begin November 29, 2021 (coinciding with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The prosecutor requests a virtual WebEx meeting in late July and an in-person preparation meeting in August.
An internal email from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 12, 2019, two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. The subject is 'Epstein MCC' (Metropolitan Correctional Center), and the sender is requesting a quick chat or meeting with the recipient around 9:30.
This document is an email read receipt dated March 25, 2021, confirming that an email with the subject 'US v. Epstein' was read. The recipient is identified as a contractor for the USANYS (United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York), while the specific names and email addresses of both parties are redacted.
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued on August 15, 2019, by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman of the Southern District of New York. It commands a redacted individual to testify and produce evidence regarding alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 (Conspiracy), 1001 (False Statements), and 1519 (Obstruction). The subpoena specifically demands the production of all materials relating to Jeffrey Epstein, including text messages, emails, social media posts, and notes.
An automatic email reply dated March 10, 2021, regarding an 'Epstein victim call'. The sender, an agent, informs the recipient they are out of the office and directs them to contact another agent on the case or a Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) for assistance.
An email chain from July 2019 initiated by NYT reporter Matthew Goldstein inquiring about rumors that Deutsche Bank controls billions in assets for Epstein's 'Financial Trust Company' and is coordinating with the recipient's office (likely federal prosecutors) regarding potential bankruptcy proceedings. A government official responds internally stating it is the first they are hearing of it.
This document is an email thread dated July 8, 2019, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the U.S. Marshals Service regarding the logistics of Jeffrey Epstein's initial court appearance. The emails discuss the timing of the case unsealing (9:15 AM), the uncertainty of the assigned judge, Epstein's transport from the MCC, and the prosecution's confirmation that they will request detention rather than an agreed bail package.
This document is an email chain from September 2021 involving a Special Agent from the U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General (New York Field Office). The agent is attempting to schedule a call with a redacted recipient to speak with themselves and a Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) specifically regarding the Epstein case.
An email dated August 27, 2021, from a redacted sender to a redacted recipient. The sender requests that an attached document be saved to the '3500 and witness folders on the Epstein share.' The term '3500' likely refers to 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (the Jencks Act), suggesting this communication involves legal proceedings or the handling of witness statements related to the Epstein case.
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) dated November 24, 2020. It summarizes a call with Dave Kelley, a Dechert attorney conducting an internal investigation for Apollo regarding Leon Black's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The email notes that the investigation seeks to understand why Black paid Epstein, with a suspicion that payments were for reasons other than stated services, and Kelley inquired if SDNY had any public information to shed light on this relationship.
This is an email dated August 3, 2020, from Parvin Moyne (Akin Gump) representing Deutsche Bank to a redacted recipient (likely a federal prosecutor or regulator). Moyne informs the recipient that the U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General has subpoenaed Deutsche Bank for copies of all government subpoenas related to Jeffrey Epstein. Moyne is seeking the recipient's permission to disclose their specific previous subpoena and the bank's production to the USVI AG.
An email chain from July 13, 2020, in which an individual reaches out to report a sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein. The sender states they were assaulted at a NYC restaurant/club when they were barely 18. They recall other 'girls' being present and one 'woman' sitting with the men, suggesting it might have been Ghislaine Maxwell. The top email is an internal forward asking for permission to acknowledge the victim's email.
This document is an automatic email reply dated December 28, 2020, related to the legal case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' (20-cr-330). The sender, whose identity is redacted, informs the recipient they are on leave for the week but checking email, and provides a redacted contact for urgent matters.
This document is an email header dated June 24, 2019, sent between two redacted individuals within the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The subject line 'Call with FBI (Epstein)' indicates coordination between federal prosecutors and the FBI regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, occurring shortly before his arrest in July 2019. The body of the email is not included in this page.
This document is an email thread from September 11, 2019, regarding logistics for an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. A government official requests travel arrangements for an unnamed 'Epstein victim' to fly from Palm Beach, FL to New York City on September 12, 2019. The purpose of the trip is for the victim to meet with the 'Epstein team of AUSAs and agents' at the SDNY office. The email confirms that USAO funds were approved to cover the costs of the flight and hotel.
An email dated June 3, 2008, with subject 'Draft Indictment' sent between redacted parties. The sender attaches two WordPerfect files (.wpd) containing a revised indictment, one with a watermark and one without, in response to a request conveyed via a phone call from a redacted individual.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to a state official (likely a prosecutor) dated June 2008 discussing the coordination of the Epstein case. The email details a conversation with Epstein's lawyer, Roy Black, regarding the federal non-prosecution agreement (NPA). It clarifies that the federal investigation will end only if Epstein abides by the NPA, which requires him to plead guilty to state charges of procuring minors for prostitution, register as a sex offender, and serve at least 18 months in prison.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney dated July 1, 2008, regarding the filing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement in the Epstein case. The prosecutor highlights that Epstein made 'misstatements' to the court regarding his employment at the 'Florida Science Foundation,' noting that the entity was only recently incorporated, operated out of attorney Jack Goldberger's office with no physical presence, and that Epstein had not been in the county to work there 'every day' as claimed. The prosecutor leaves it to the recipient's discretion whether to inform the Court of these lies.
An urgent, high-priority email dated November 29, 2007, from Joyce Williams (Legal Administrative Assistant at Akerman Senterfitt) to an individual at USAFLS (US Attorney's Office). The subject line is 'Epstein,' and the message requests the recipient to call Judge Davis immediately. The email includes standard legal confidentiality and tax advice disclaimers.
This document is an email dated November 1, 2007, containing a draft communication intended for the State Attorney's Office. The sender (likely a federal prosecutor) is coordinating the timing of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing with state proceedings. The email highlights the existence of a federal non-prosecution agreement and requests that Judge McSorley schedule the plea and sentencing before January 4, 2008, to ensure Epstein complies with the federal agreement terms.
An email chain from September 21, 2007, involving attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez attempting to finalize a plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. Sanchez emails a vacationing official claiming they are ready to sign, but internal emails between (presumably) prosecutors or DOJ officials express confusion and dismissal, stating Sanchez has 'not been in any negotiations' and referring to her as 'yet another cook.'
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-11 | Received | U.S. Attorney's O... | [Redacted Recipient] | $0.00 | Modification P00005 to order 15JA5418F00000299 ... | View |
Initial disclosure: Victim states she was sexually assaulted by Epstein at age 18 in an NYC club.
Forwarding an email from a member of the public ('conspiracy theorist') directed to Geoffrey Berman regarding Prince Andrew.
Discussing delays in drafting a submission due to the client's fragile state and the onset of Coronavirus lockdowns. Mentions attorneys are working from home.
Sharing a Google Doc draft of a factual statement. Argues that the client was a 'cog in Epstein's wheel' and a 'vulnerable victim' deserving of a 'non-pros' (non-prosecution agreement).
Confirming receipt, thanks.
Requesting a copy of the disclosure being considered for the client to help address concerns discussed the previous night.
Confirmation of a meeting at 3:00 p.m. on Monday at 1 St. Andrews Plaza.
Asking if they want the numbers from Epstein included.
Confirmation to include Epstein numbers.
Request for the approximate number of human trafficking victims interviewed over the past year.
Reporting that staff are being targeted by NYT via personal email; notes that the Warden held a recall to prohibit sharing info.
Please see attached letter from Judge Richard M. Berman. (See attached file: Aug 12 letter.pdf)
Sender mentions 'I'll call you in a moment to discuss logistics.'
Follow-up regarding the 'forfeiture issue' and requesting a time to talk.
Submission of Lieutenant's log and daily activity report for Saturday, August 3, 2019. Includes attachments: TEXT.htm, Daily Activities Report 8-03-2019.docx, LIEUTENANT'S LOG 08-03-2019.docm
FYI – we’ll decline on this. Doubtful there’s guidance, but let me now if you have any. Thanks.
Thanks very much, Avi
Congratulating recipient on handling the Epstein case. 'Go get em, tiger. Save all of your sympathy for my poor, misunderstood clients.'
Request for comment regarding the recipient's participation in the Epstein prosecution, specifically asking about age, conflicts of interest regarding their father, work at Debevoise & Plimpton, and a 2016 case.
Recipient thanks the sender and notes excitement that the sender is in EDVA.
Sender congratulates recipient on working the Epstein case, calling it excellent and important.
Forwarding verification of attorney status.
Instructions to place Epstein on Psychological Observation or Suicide Watch upon return from court due to risk factors.
Good. Head fake
Art of war
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity