| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[Redacted Recipient]
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey Berman
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Gary Bloxsome
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Case Agent]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigator target |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jill Greenfield
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bert Ocariz
|
Friend |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin Weinberg
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Represented by |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Respondent]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Scheduled conference call between Defense Counsel (Menninger) and SDNY Prosecutors. | Teleconference | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Phone call coordination regarding Epstein investigation | Phone | View |
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | Phone call between Jill Greenfield and SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the investigation. | Phone Call | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Planned second interview between SDNY/FBI and witness via phone. | Remote (Phone) | View |
| 2019-10-15 | N/A | Meeting with a witness | Unknown | View |
| 2019-10-15 | N/A | Call/Meeting regarding forfeiture question | Phone | View |
| 2019-09-16 | N/A | Meeting with another case team | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-10 | N/A | Meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Initial Meeting | West Palm Beach (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | First meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | In-person meeting between Nascimento, his client, and prosecutors (implied by July 13 email sayin... | Hilton, 600 Okeechobee Blvd... | View |
| 2019-05-29 | N/A | Proposed meeting date between SDNY, Isidro Garcia, and the witness. | Likely New York (SDNY) | View |
| 2019-05-22 | N/A | Phone conversation between Isidro Garcia and Assistant U.S. Attorney (referenced as 'yesterday' i... | Phone | View |
| 2016-09-18 | N/A | Meeting | Unspecified | View |
| 2014-04-21 | N/A | Scheduled meeting | Unknown (Sender leaves at 5... | View |
| 2008-03-01 | N/A | Trip to New York by the lead AUSA from the Southern District of Florida | New York | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Negotiation and revision of the 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' regarding victim repr... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2007-09-11 | N/A | Transmission of the revised Non-Prosecution Agreement for Jeffrey Epstein. | West Palm Beach, FL (Sender... | View |
This document is an email from April 2023 sent by Daniel Ruzumna, an attorney for the Epstein Estate, to a federal agent. Ruzumna reports that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video potentially containing child pornography, which had been sent to Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The review was immediately halted, and the Estate sought guidance from federal authorities.
An email chain from December 17, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely NYPD personnel. The AUSA requests that Theresa Acosta, the court reporter for Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition, be brought to the courthouse during lunch because the prosecution fears the defense might not stipulate (agree) to the deposition as previously promised. The respondent confirms they left a voicemail for Acosta.
This document is an email chain from early 2020 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (representing a party litigating against Jeffrey Epstein's estate) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence involves the submission of a 'Touhy letter' by the private firm to request documents from the Department of Justice regarding Epstein. The emails track the initial request in January, the formal submission in February, and a follow-up check-in during April 2020.
This document is an email chain between attorney Sigrid McCawley and the SDNY (specifically an Assistant US Attorney, possibly named Boxer) regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, a visit to Epstein's house, and a movie outing with him. The SDNY expresses confidence in the witness's truthfulness and requests a follow-up interview to review her experiences again.
An email chain from October 2020 between the SDNY and the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding an attempt to interview a former Epstein employee living on Long Island. Investigators visited the subject's home, where his daughter translated due to his poor English; they acknowledged the inquiry was about Epstein but referred investigators to their attorney, Aitan Gohlman. The emails also mention that Gohlman represents another witness of interest.
This document is an email chain between attorney Joe Nascimento and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) regarding a client who was a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein (2004-2005). The correspondence begins on July 6, 2019, when the client is served a grand jury subpoena. Key discussions involve scheduling meetings in West Palm Beach, clarifying financial compensation the client received from Epstein (including a cash lump sum and perks like gym/English classes), and addressing the client's lack of a U.S. passport despite being a citizen.
This document is a subpoena issued on July 19, 2021, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It commands an unnamed individual to appear at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The subpoena was issued under the authority of US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
This document is a legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, Michael Miller) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. It supplements a previous discovery request, specifically demanding the preservation and production of documents from the lead prosecutor (name redacted) who investigated Epstein in 2006-2008 in the Southern District of Florida. The request focuses on communications regarding investigations in New York in 2008, a March 2008 trip to New York by said prosecutor, and communications with victim witnesses regarding their rights.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida), signed on behalf of Alexander Acosta, to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz. The letter aggressively rebuts Lefkowitz's allegations of misconduct, specifically denying a conflict of interest regarding the potential appointment of Bert Ocariz and defending the office's handling of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and victim notifications. The author expresses surprise at the attacks given previous cooperation and asserts that the office made significant concessions to Epstein during negotiations.
This document is an email summary of an attorney proffer dated March 1, 2021, involving attorneys Mariann Wang and Gloria Allred and an AUSA. It details new information provided by their client regarding interactions with Jeffrey Epstein between December 2018 and July 2019, contradicting the idea that contact ceased in 2017. The summary alleges Epstein lured the client to various locations (Paris, Florida, NY, VI) under the guise of employment or medical help (dental), manipulated the client into feeling indebted, sexually abused the client in Florida and the Virgin Islands, and tasked the client with recruiting or vetting young women, including a specific instance in Russia.
Email exchange between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant US Attorney regarding a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense. The defense is seeking to subpoena information from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund regarding a specific (redacted) individual. The AUSA states their intention to file a motion to quash this subpoena to protect the victim's information.
Request for travel arrangements for a victim-witness to appear for trial and trial preparation.
Discussing privacy concerns regarding files and disclosures made to the Fund under confidentiality assurances.
Informing Jack about a motion filed by Maxwell's counsel to subpoena the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund and stating intent to file a motion to quash.
Request for travel arrangements for a fact witness to attend trial preparation and trial.
AUSA is trying to access an expired NBC News link regarding a British teen model lured into Epstein's web and asks for assistance.
Confirming completion of requested subpoena for N722JE and forwarding to general counsel for review.
Confirming completion of requested subpoena for N722JE and forwarding to general counsel for review.
Attached is the subpoena we discussed.
Sending attached subpoena following a phone call.
Confirming witness availability for Ms. Maxwell's trial; notes witness will need to fly to NY.
Confirmation that the Government opposes the motion for bail and intends to file a response.
Informing the AUSA of intent to file motion for bail in the Second Circuit and requesting confirmation of government opposition.
Acknowledging Markus as appellate counsel; noting that referenced docket entries are mostly unredacted or available via other defense counsel; referencing Protective Order ECF No. 36.
Introduction as counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal; request for unredacted documents (docket entries 4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169).
Requesting information on when the newly redacted exhibit 11 can be sent.
Hey [Redacted] – yes, sent it last night!
Requesting a list of every FOIA request the office has received relating to Epstein or Maxwell, outcome of requests, and AUSA points of contact.
Providing FOIA tracking database info regarding Epstein FOIAs and an attached letter regarding discovery vs FOIA.
Asking to check records for missing cases, specifically mentioning a civil case involving a FOIA request from Radar Online.
Explaining that the FOIA Tracking Database only covers requests directed to their Office, not requests to other components (e.g., FBI) that end up in litigation in SDNY.
Asking how to determine if the civil division litigated cases based on FOIA requests to other components.
Suggesting a round-robin to the Civ Div. Listing specific matters: NYT v BOP (2020V00220) and Epstein victim Touhy requests (2019V01791).
AUSA sending index of physical items in FBI custody from Miami office to defense counsel in advance of a call.
Confirming call time and providing dial-in details.
Proposing 1:30 p.m. ET / 11:30 a.m. MST for the call.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity