MS. DONALESKI

Person

Mentions

11

Relationships

6

Events

5

Documents

5

Search

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

6 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person your Honor	Professional	6	1	View
person MR. FIGGINS	Professional adversarial	6	1	View
person MR. FIGGINS	Professional	5	1	View
person MR. FOY	Legal representative	5	1	View
person the defendant	Legal representative	5	1	View
person MR. FOY	Opposing counsel	1	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
2019-12-19	Court hearing	A hearing where Mr. Figgins requested a seven-day extension to secure cosigners for Mr. Thomas, a...	Courtroom (implied)	View
2019-12-19	Court hearing	A discussion during a court proceeding regarding the defense's request for a timeline on an inspe...	Court	View
2019-12-19	N/A	Court Hearing filed on this date.	Courtroom (Southern District)	View
2019-12-19	N/A	Court Hearing regarding modification of release conditions.	Courtroom (Southern Distric...	View
2019-12-19	N/A	Court hearing/status conference (Document Filed Date)	Court	View

DOJ-OGR-00021990.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 19, 2019. An attorney, Mr. Figgins, successfully requests a one-week extension to secure cosigners for his client, Mr. Thomas, a process which requires an interview by the U.S. Attorney's Office. Subsequently, another attorney, Ms. Donaleski, requests that time be excluded from trial calculations, which the court grants under the Speedy Trial Act.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021989.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated December 19, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). Ms. Donaleski, representing the government, states no objection to expanding the defendant's travel to the Middle District of Pennsylvania but strongly opposes the defendant possessing a firearm due to safety concerns for Pretrial Services officers who conduct unscheduled home visits. The Court agrees with the government and Judge Netburn's previous ruling, denying the application to keep the firearm as a 'commonsense safety measure.'

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021983.jpg

This is a transcript of a court proceeding from December 19, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Defense counsel, Mr. Figgins, requests that the court obtain a timeline from the government for an inspector general's report, which he believes is vital for his case. The government's counsel, Ms. Donaleski, responds that she does not have a timeline for the report but assures the court that all relevant discovery materials will be provided to the defense.

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021982.jpg

A transcript page from a court hearing filed on December 19, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). Defense attorney Mr. Foy argues that 'outside circumstances' are driving the prosecution and expresses concern about receiving discovery and potential Brady material in time for an April 20 trial date. The Judge is unpersuaded and sets the trial for April 20, with Ms. Donaleski estimating the government's case will take approximately one week.

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021980.jpg

This document is page 4 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (United States v. Tartaglione), filed on December 19, 2019. The discussion involves scheduling, specifically regarding a 'DOJ inspector general report' (likely related to the Jeffrey Epstein jail suicide investigation, as Tartaglione was Epstein's cellmate) which the defense is interested in, while the prosecution (Ms. Donaleski) argues it should not delay the case. The Court sets a control date for January 30 and a trial date for April 20.

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

4

As Recipient

0

Total

4

Modification of bail conditions (travel and firearms)

From: MS. DONALESKI

To: THE COURT

Argument regarding travel restrictions and safety concerns regarding defendant possessing a firearm.

Meeting

2019-12-19

Communication Source

Discovery and DOJ IG Report

From: MS. DONALESKI

To: THE COURT

Stating discovery will be provided by end of December and arguing against delaying the case for the DOJ IG report.

Court proceeding

2019-12-19

Communication Source

Response regarding inspector general's report and discovery

From: MS. DONALESKI

To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Donaleski states she does not have a time frame for the inspector general's report but assures that the government will produce all relevant discovery materials from the criminal investigation to the defense.

Court hearing dialogue

2019-12-19

Communication Source

Response regarding inspector general's report and discovery

From: MS. DONALESKI

To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Donaleski states she does not have a time frame for the inspector general's report but assures that the government will produce all relevant discovery materials from the criminal investigation to the defense.

Court hearing dialogue

2019-12-19

Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity