Ms. Comey
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
15
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
38 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Meder
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
37 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
155 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Recess pending verdict | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Shawn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of David Rodgers | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Michael Dawson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018619.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Meder by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the admission of evidence. Specifically, the witness identifies Government Exhibit 307 as a photograph of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell retrieved from an investigation CD logged as '1B26'.
DOJ-OGR-00018597.jpg
This document is an index of examination from a court transcript for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It outlines the examination of witnesses KATE, PATRICK McHUGH, KELLY MAGUIRE, and KIMBERLY MEDER by various attorneys, listing the page numbers for each direct, cross, redirect, and recross examination. The document also lists several government exhibits that were received into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018583.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of a photograph as evidence. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on the grounds of improper authentication, as there is no witness to testify about the photo's origin or integrity. In response, attorney Ms. Moe argues the photo is authenticated because it is part of a collection seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residence, and its relevance is tied to the relationship between Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018580.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Meder. The witness testifies about reviewing an image from a CD related to the 'Epstein and Maxwell investigation' and identifies both Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein as the individuals depicted in Government Exhibit 304. The proceedings are then adjourned for the day by the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00018579.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Meder by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Ms. Comey requests and receives permission from the court for the witness to use Government Exhibit 304, a CD, as a memory aid during testimony, despite a potential hearsay concern raised by opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger. The transcript concludes with Ms. Comey asking a Ms. Drescher to display the exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00018576.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an FBI Staff Operations Specialist named Meder by Ms. Comey. Meder testifies to having 10 years of experience at the FBI, currently working on the child exploitation and human trafficking squad, and begins to explain how FBI case files and evidence are organized.
DOJ-OGR-00018575.jpg
This court transcript excerpt from August 10, 2022, captures the transition between witnesses in a trial. After Agent Maguire is excused, the court and counsel briefly discuss whether to begin with a new witness, Kimberly Meder, due to the late hour. They decide to proceed, and Ms. Meder is called by the government, sworn in, and provides her name for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00016909.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The transcript captures the conclusion of the government's case, as confirmed by Ms. Comey, and the subsequent colloquy between the judge and the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge formally advises Ms. Maxwell of her right to testify or not to testify, stressing that the decision is hers alone, despite any advice from her attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00016897.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the afternoon session of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey informs the court that stipulations have been reached and the case is nearing conclusion, though one disputed issue remains. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger begins to address the court regarding this disputed fact.
DOJ-OGR-00016872.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It records the conclusion of testimony by a witness named Ms. Healy, the dismissal of the jury for lunch, and a subsequent procedural discussion regarding the release of AUSA Alex Rossmiller from a defense subpoena.
DOJ-OGR-00016870.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Healy by attorney Ms. Comey. The questioning establishes that the witness worked in Jeffrey Epstein's office, but not his homes, and probes her knowledge of his associates and other potential employees from the late 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00016810.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of Agent Young by attorney Ms. Comey. The questioning reveals that Agent Young interviewed an individual named 'Jane' about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and that Jane's disclosures were a gradual process over multiple meetings rather than a single event. The transcript also includes a sustained objection by another attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding the scope of the questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00016261.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a sidebar discussion between attorneys and the judge. The attorneys are debating how to question a witness about her reasons for returning to visit Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico, with the court ruling that testimony about what the witness's mother said is inadmissible hearsay. An attorney then proposes an alternative line of questioning focused on the witness's own feelings to circumvent the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00016216.jpg
This document is an 'Index of Examination' page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the direct examination of Lawrence Visoski (Jeffrey Epstein's longtime pilot) by Ms. Comey starting on page 88. It also logs the receipt of several Government Exhibits (Nos. 112, 115, 111, 202, 212, 932, and 704) into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00016215.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. The transcript captures the end of a day's proceedings, where the judge adjourns the court until 8:45 a.m. on November 30, 2021. The judge expresses frustration with numerous 'sidebars' during the day's opening statements and instructs the attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell, to meet before the next session to resolve issues in advance.
DOJ-OGR-00016208.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the judge's remarks at the end of the day. The judge dismisses the jury, outlines the daily schedule (9:30 AM to 5:00 PM), and details the specific trial dates for the weeks of Christmas and New Year's in December. The transcript also includes a brief, preceding testimony mentioning a personal assistant named Kimberly.
DOJ-OGR-00016203.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Visoski. The prosecutor, Ms. Comey, presents two government exhibits, which Visoski identifies as fair and accurate photos of the exterior of Mr. Epstein's brownstone at 9 East 71st Street in New York. With no objection from the opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, the court admits the exhibits into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00016198.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. In it, a witness named Visoski, under questioning by government attorney Ms. Comey, identifies a photo of Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach residence and provides a detailed description of the home's interior layout. During the testimony, "Government Exhibit 212" is admitted into evidence by the court without objection.
DOJ-OGR-00016197.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Visoski identifies Government Exhibit 202 as a photograph of the garage and exterior of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence. Visoski also mentions having previously performed audio/video work at the home.
DOJ-OGR-00016188.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of Mr. Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski testifies that he met Mr. Epstein in 1991 and was hired as a captain and licensed aircraft mechanic for his private planes. He states that between 1994 and 2004, he flew Mr. Epstein approximately every four days, primarily transporting him between his various homes.
DOJ-OGR-00016185.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of the direct examination of the government's first witness, Lawrence Paul Visoski, Jr., conducted by Ms. Comey. After being sworn in, Visoski states his full name, his nickname (Larry), and his profession as an airline transport pilot.
DOJ-OGR-00016184.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. In the excerpt, the judge confirms with Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell that there are no preliminary issues to address before the jury enters. The court then prepares to bring in the jury for Ms. Comey's witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016183.jpg
This is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The dialogue involves defense attorney Mr. Everdell, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and the Judge discussing procedural matters, including jury instructions for binders and the display of exhibits. The Judge also sets the upcoming trial schedule for the weeks of Christmas and New Year's, establishing daily start times (9:30 AM) and counsel meetings (8:45 AM).
DOJ-OGR-00016182.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It captures a procedural discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and attorneys (Ms. Comey, Mr. Everdell, Ms. Sternheim) while the jury is not present. The main topic is the logistical handling of binders containing sealed exhibits for the jury, with the parties agreeing to place them under the jurors' chairs before testimony begins.
DOJ-OGR-00016173.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, containing an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim. The statement describes a girl named Annie who, at age 16, met Epstein in New York hoping for career support and later met Ghislaine for the first and only time in Santa Fe. The speaker asserts that nothing criminal occurred during the Santa Fe meeting and that Annie was above the age of consent in New Mexico at the time.
Proposed limiting instructions
At the court's request, Ms. Comey reads the proposed (but now withdrawn) limiting instructions for a video and a photo (Government Exhibit 250) into the record.
Proposed limiting instructions
At the court's request, Ms. Comey reads the proposed (but now withdrawn) limiting instructions for a video and a photo (Government Exhibit 250) into the record.
Request to seal discussion of witness's family details
Ms. Comey requests that if Mr. Pagliuca is going to discuss the details of Carolyn's family, the discussion should be held at side bar and under seal.
Relevance of a photograph as evidence
Ms. Comey argues that a disturbing photograph displayed outside Mr. Epstein's bedroom contradicts the defense's argument that the defendant was unaware of Epstein's attraction to underage females due to a 'halo effect'.
Description of Mr. Epstein's ranch property in New Mexico
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Visoski, about the layout and buildings on a ranch property owned by Mr. Epstein in New Mexico.
Objection to characterization of testimony
Ms. Comey objects to Mr. Pagliuca's attempt to read testimony into the record, stating she does not believe it is inconsistent with prior testimony.
Government Exhibit 296
Ms. Comey questions Gregory Parkinson about the contents of Government Exhibit 296, a CD. Parkinson identifies it and describes its contents as video of a search warrant execution.
Direct Examination regarding flight logs
Q&A regarding Mr. Alessi's role and the details of flight 979 on May 9, 1997.
Bringing friends to Jeffrey Epstein's house
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Carolyn, about the ages of her friends (Amanda, Tatum, Julie) when she brought them to Jeffrey Epstein's house. Carolyn states Epstein asked her to bring friends, and describes entering the house and going to a massage room.
Cleaning procedures after Mr. Epstein's massages.
Ms. Comey questions Mr. Alessi about what he cleaned up after Mr. Epstein's massages. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the time frame. Mr. Alessi explains that whether he cleaned up towels depended on if the massage therapist was a repeat visitor or a new person.
Identification of Little St. James
Q&A regarding the identification of an aerial photo of the island and descriptions of buildings on it.
Observations of female guests at Epstein's home
Questioning regarding the frequency and behavior of female guests at the pool over a 12-year period.
Cleaning procedures after Mr. Epstein's massages.
Ms. Comey questions Mr. Alessi about what he cleaned up after Mr. Epstein's massages. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the time frame. Mr. Alessi explains that whether he cleaned up towels depended on if the massage therapist was a repeat visitor or a new person.
Closing Argument
Argument for guilty verdict based on evidence and Judge's instructions.
Identification of Evidence
Questioning regarding the identification of people in Government Exhibit 347.
Admission of Evidence
Request to admit Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 into evidence under seal.
Admission of Evidence
Requesting permission for jurors to view Government Exhibits 223, 224, and 225.
Government Exhibit 310 (a photograph)
Ms. Comey questions the witness, Mr. Visoski, about the contents of a photograph. Mr. Visoski identifies the people, aircraft, and location in the photo.
Credibility of witnesses against Ghislaine Maxwell
Ms. Comey argues that the four witnesses against Ghislaine Maxwell testified for justice, not for financial gain. She states they had already received 'million-dollar payouts' and would not have subjected themselves to a grueling and humiliating trial and cross-examination if their testimony were false.
Rebuttal Argument
Ms. Comey argues that the case is about Ghislaine Maxwell's specific crimes and participation in abuse, refuting the defense's attempts to distract the jury.
Direct Examination
Questions regarding the procedure following the search on October 20, 2005.
Direction to review Government Exhibit 14
Ms. Comey asks the Court to direct the jury to turn to Government Exhibit 14, specifically to a child's name and birth date entry.
Objection to Defense Opening
Ms. Comey objects that the defense is violating a pretrial ruling by arguing the government is targeting the defendant. The Court clarifies that the defense can argue witnesses are using the defendant as a scapegoat, but cannot attack the prosecution's motives.
Case Schedule and Stipulations
Informing the court that stipulations have been reached and the case may conclude that afternoon.
Identification of individuals in photographs from the Eps...
Ms. Comey questions a witness who identifies Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in two photographs (Exhibits 307 and 320), which are subsequently admitted into evidence by the court. The witness states the photos came from a CD reviewed during the investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity