Ms. Comey
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
15
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Mr. Parkinson
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
38 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Meder
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
37 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
155 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Recess pending verdict | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Shawn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of David Rodgers | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Kimberly Meder | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski by Ms. Comey | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court recess taken after discussion between counsel and judge. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Michael Dawson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of witness Rodgers regarding Government Exhibit 662 (a logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Gregory Parkinson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 2 for identification. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Juan Patricio Alessi | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013545.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing procedural discussions in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Counsel, including Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger, address the court regarding the placement of exhibits for the jury and the arrangements for the upcoming testimony of witness Annie Farmer. It is established that Farmer will not testify anonymously but a counsel screen will be used for her protection.
DOJ-OGR-00013540.jpg
This document is an index of examination from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the direct, cross, and redirect examinations of witnesses Janine Gill Velez, Shawn, Nicole Hesse, and David Rodgers by various attorneys, providing the corresponding page numbers in the full transcript. The document also includes a list of government exhibits that were received into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00013532.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the redirect examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot), who testifies to meeting a specific person in September 2003 and a 'Jane' in November 1996, referencing his flight logbook for verification. The witness confirms he recalls no one else with that first name on Jeffrey Epstein's planes, after which he is excused, and the court adjourns for the day.
DOJ-OGR-00013531.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' recollection of being shown two defense photographs (LV3A and LV3B) and a person in them who shares a first name with someone named Jane. Rodgers confirms they met Jane before meeting the person in the photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00013529.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Mr. Rodgers denies that his daughter ever massaged Jeffrey Epstein and denies ever receiving $18.3 million from Epstein. He is also questioned about his knowledge of Epstein's properties in New York and Florida, estimating that the New York residence was acquired around 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00013524.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning confirms that Rodgers' flight logs were previously subpoenaed and turned over to both the FBI and plaintiffs' lawyers as part of a past civil litigation, a task handled by his attorney. The name "Epstein" is mentioned briefly at the beginning of the excerpt in relation to an unnamed female.
DOJ-OGR-00013509.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The witness confirms a passenger named 'Emmy' flew on Epstein's planes but testifies that, according to his memory and flight logs, 'Annie Farmer' was never a passenger. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, then moves to show the jury documents marked LV4 and LV5, which are admitted under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00013505.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the case number). The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of Eva Dubin, her marriage to Glenn Dubin, and flights taken with her children, Selena and Jordan. Notably, the testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was Selena Dubin's godfather.
DOJ-OGR-00013484.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a portion of a trial. A lawyer, Mr. Everdell, is cross-examining a witness, Mr. Rodgers, and requests that both the witness and the jury view evidence labeled LV3A and LV3B, which are photos. Mr. Everdell specifically instructs the witness that he knows the person's name in the photos but should not say it aloud in court.
DOJ-OGR-00013472.jpg
This document is page 194 from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. The testimony initially covers legal liability regarding aircraft ownership, during which prosecutor Ms. Comey successfully objects multiple times. The questioning then shifts to specific flights and the witness's familiarity with Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
DOJ-OGR-00013470.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony establishes that helicopters were owned by 'Air Ghislaine, Inc.' and purchased by Jeffrey Epstein from Sikorsky. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that Epstein controlled the companies owning the aircraft, and questions the witness's employment history prior to working for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013447.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on whether Rodgers, a pilot, ever saw females who appeared to be under the age of 18 or 19 on flights he piloted for Epstein between 1994 and 2004, and also after 2004. Rodgers denies seeing any such individuals and confirms his recollection that a woman referred to as "Jane" appeared to be at least 18 when he met her.
DOJ-OGR-00013438.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. Attorney Ms. Comey requests that the jury be directed to Government Exhibit 14, specifically to a child's name and date of birth entry. After receiving no objection from opposing counsel Mr. Everdell and approval from the court, Ms. Comey concludes her direct examination of the witness, Rodgers.
DOJ-OGR-00013437.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely pilot David Rodgers). The testimony confirms specific flight log entries from July 2001, establishing that Virginia Roberts flew with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell from Santa Fe to Teterboro on July 16, and later flew alone with Epstein from St. Thomas to Palm Beach on July 28.
DOJ-OGR-00013424.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Virginia Roberts were all passengers on flight 1444 from Teterboro, NJ to Palm Beach, FL on January 26, 2001. The transcript also establishes a subsequent flight, 1445, from Palm Beach to St. Thomas, USVI on January 29, 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00013423.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of witness Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony confirms the contents of flight logs (Government Exhibit 662) regarding Flight 1434 on December 14, 2000, from Teterboro, NJ to St. Thomas. The witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Virginia Roberts were all passengers on this specific flight.
DOJ-OGR-00013416.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition or trial transcript. It discusses a flight on May 9th, 1997, from Teterboro, New Jersey, to Santa Fe, New Mexico, and questions whether Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jane were passengers on that flight.
DOJ-OGR-00013413.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers. Rodgers testifies that he first met a passenger, referred to as 'Jane', on a flight on November 11, 1996, and saw her a total of four times on Jeffrey Epstein's planes. He also states that Jane flew with both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00013412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of Mr. Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The questioning focuses on identifying a specific female passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's planes who is known to have attended Interlochen. The witness confirms the identity of this passenger by referencing Government Exhibit 12 without stating the name aloud.
DOJ-OGR-00013411.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge confirms with attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell that there are no outstanding matters before instructing for the jury to be brought in and for the witness, Mr. Rodgers, to take the stand.
DOJ-OGR-00013409.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It details a discussion between the Judge, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding a specific jury instruction for a witness named Rodgers. The Judge agrees to instruct the jury that alleged physical contact between the witness, Epstein, and Maxwell in New Mexico was not 'illegal sexual activity,' and the parties agree to discuss a separate 'Rule 412' issue at sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00013408.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the afternoon session of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell requests edits to a limiting instruction for the jury regarding an upcoming witness, specifically changing the phrase 'sexual conduct' to 'physical contact' regarding interactions with Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense confer and agree on the language before the judge approves it.
DOJ-OGR-00013407.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense Attorney Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Comey regarding the admissibility of evidence connected to the testimony of Mr. Alessi and an anticipated witness. The discussion concludes with the court taking a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00013406.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the Judge ('The Court') and Ms. Comey regarding 'Government Exhibit 52' and whether the defense had an opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The Judge notes a potential misunderstanding about the defense's opportunity to cross-examine, while Ms. Comey asserts that extensive examination and voir dire of Mr. Alessi occurred.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding witness background, education, and past relationships.
Transcript availability
Not necessarily, your Honor. We're not being recorded right now and we're getting a transcript.
Evidentiary Ruling
The Court sustains a foundation objection regarding witness testimony about a book version, instructing the jury to disregard specific beliefs of the witness.
Pretrial ruling on cross-examination topics
Ms. Comey requests a ruling on whether the government needs to 'draw the sting' on direct examination regarding a witness's juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors.
Admissibility of Photograph (Exhibit 250)
Argument describing a photo of Epstein and a girl, arguing its probative value because it was displayed in the house the defendant ran.
Redirect Examination
Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.
Timing of evidence release
Discussion regarding the timeline for releasing redacted photographs (by Sunday) and videos (by Tuesday) due to IT staff schedules.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding identification of a photograph (Exhibit 104) depicting the witness at age 14.
Pretrial ruling on cross-examination topics
Requesting a ruling on whether juvenile arrests and old misdemeanors can be used in cross-examination.
Scheduling/Adjournment
Stating there is nothing further to take up and they will keep the defense informed.
Evidence Authentication and Cross-Examination
Discussion regarding stipulations on evidence, specifically birth certificates and a prior sworn statement, and upcoming discussions on cross-examination limits.
Rule 48 application to dismiss the Epstein indictment
Ms. Comey confirms the legal necessity to abate proceedings due to Epstein's death but clarifies that the investigation into coconspirators continues.
Jurisdiction over investigation into Mr. Epstein's death
Ms. Comey argues to the Court that an investigation into Mr. Epstein's death is already being conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI, and that it is not within the court's purview to conduct a separate, independent investigation.
Redirect Examination regarding binders and CDs
Ms. Comey attempts to ask Ms. Meder about specific initials seen on black binders and dates seen on CDs. Ms. Menninger objects on grounds of hearsay. The Court sustains the objections.
Identification of underage females
Questioning regarding the identity of two females seen at Epstein's Palm Beach house.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding building layout and identification of exhibits.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding the frequency of visits to Zorro Ranch and identification of photos of the property.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity