Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
48
Very Strong
|
120 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
21
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
73 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional employment membership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Employment affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Potentially defense counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-07 | N/A | Order Granting Motion to Withdraw | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Men... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal filing | The declaration regarding the change of counsel and withdrawal of HMF was dated and submitted. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Attorneys Pagliuca and Menninger sign motion to withdraw as counsel. | Denver, CO (implied by sign... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Reply Memorandum | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL". | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing submission | A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-09 | N/A | Submission of legal motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. | New York (Southern District... | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Legal filing | Filing of a letter by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislai... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-29 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE,... | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-28 | Jury trial | Court proceedings for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-27 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 20 CR 330 (AJN). | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-22 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002740.jpg
This is the final page (Conclusion) of a legal motion filed on February 23, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Her defense team argues that additional proposed conditions—including renouncing foreign citizenship and asset monitoring—should satisfy the Bail Reform Act. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002714.jpg
This document is page 21 of a defense motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense attorneys (Cohen & Gresser LLP) are requesting the Court order the government to disclose 'bad acts' evidence (Rule 404(b)) by March 12, 2021, a request the government previously denied. The document concludes the legal brief and is signed by Mark S. Cohen.
DOJ-OGR-00020104.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on December 23, 2020, it is a reply memorandum in support of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document lists the names and contact information for her legal team from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00020059.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 39) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The text explicitly requests the Court to order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the contact information and signatures for her defense team, consisting of attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00020015.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00017363.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated November 30, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus others). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00005665.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a 'Motion in Limine', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 29, 2021. The motion is filed on behalf of the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The purpose of the motion is to request the exclusion of evidence related to an individual identified as 'Accuser-3'.
DOJ-OGR-00005647.jpg
This document is the signature page of a court filing (Document 386) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005625.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to exclude evidence based on Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the precedent set by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and requests a hearing on the matter. The document lists the names and contact information for Maxwell's attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005620.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 11 of 12) of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the Government failed to comply with Rule 404(b) notice deadlines (originally May 28, extended to October 11), depriving Maxwell of the chance to litigate properly, and they request the Court exclude this belated evidence. The document lists the contact information for defense attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005595.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to prevent the prosecution from introducing statements from alleged co-conspirators. This request is framed as a sanction for the prosecution's purported failure to adhere to a court order issued on September 3, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005523.jpg
This document is a signature page from a court filing (Document 382) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information. The document is respectfully submitted on behalf of their client, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005391.jpg
This document is the signature page from a legal filing (Document 378) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 27, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005389.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 27, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding sexual behavior evidence) under seal. It also outlines the defense's plan to serve redacted copies of this motion to the counsel of the specific alleged victims whose behavior is discussed in the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00005378.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated October 25, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca informs the court that the defense has filed an Omnibus Response to the Government's Motions in Limine under seal to allow time to review for necessary redactions, with a public filing and justification letter to follow by October 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002674.jpg
This is a legal document filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated January 25, 2021, the document is a 'Notice of Motion' from Maxwell's legal team at Cohen & Gresser LLP, stating their intent to file a motion to strike 'surplusage' from the superseding indictment against her. This is identified as Pretrial Motion #6.
DOJ-OGR-00002672.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (page 18 of the specific filing, page 24 of the PDF) of a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In this document, dated January 25, 2021, Maxwell's legal team (Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and Bobbi C. Sternheim) formally requests that the Court dismiss the indictment against her. The page lists the contact information for all defense attorneys involved.
DOJ-OGR-00005775.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude the introduction of specific government exhibits (251, 288, 294, 313, and 606) in her trial. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005773.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys request that the court issue an order preventing all trial participants from referring to the accusers as "victims" or "minor victims." They argue that using such terms would violate Ms. Maxwell's presumption of innocence and lessen the government's burden of proof.
DOJ-OGR-00005747.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude law enforcement witnesses from offering expert opinion testimony. The document lists the names and contact information for the four attorneys and their respective law firms representing the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005744.jpg
This is a page from a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorneys argue that a redacted individual's identification of Maxwell should be suppressed because the individual never previously identified Maxwell as an abuser in interviews or under oath. The document asserts that the identification procedure was suggestive and occurred too long after the alleged events.
DOJ-OGR-00005738.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing, titled 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION', lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. It serves as the formal introduction to a request for the court to exclude certain identification evidence from the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005735.jpg
This document is the signature page from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 29, 2021. It lists the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005726.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Motion in Limine' filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The motion seeks to exclude evidence allegedly seized during a search of 358 El Brillo Way (Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence) that occurred on October 20, 2005. It lists the legal defense team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00005722.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 10 of 11) of a legal filing in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated October 18, 2021, and filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text concludes a legal argument regarding hearsay evidence, asserting that a specific record does not meet the business records exception. It lists the defense legal team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, Cohen & Gresser, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-29 | Paid | Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | United States Dis... | $75.00 | Admission fee for pro hac vice appearance | View |
Ms. Maxwell's Fed. R. Evid. 412 Motion
A letter filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412.
Ms. Maxwell's Fed. R. Evid. 412 Motion
Letter regarding evidence motion
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification that Maxwell's Omnibus Response to Government's Motions in Limine was filed under seal to allow time for redaction review.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330
General correspondence letter regarding the case
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330
Correspondence regarding the case.
Request to reserve the right to file additional/supplemen...
A letter from Ms. Maxwell's counsel to the judge arguing that there has been insufficient time to review recent government disclosures and prepare filings by the deadline. The letter reserves the right to file additional motions after the deadline, citing a previous court order and issues with accessing encrypted files provided by the government.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Letter regarding the case.
Filing of a Rule 412 motion
A letter from counsel Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan stating that Ms. Maxwell will file a Rule 412 motion on or before November 15, 2021. The letter argues this timing is necessary to allow counsel to adequately consult with Ms. Maxwell and prepare the motion.
Deadline for Filing Motion under FRE 412
Letter regarding deadline for filing motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412
Deadline for Filing Motion under Federal Rule of Evidence...
Request concerning Rape Shield Law motions.
Deadline for Filing Motion under Federal Rule of Evidence...
Request to confirm November 15, 2021 as the deadline for filing a Rule 412 motion, citing recent discovery disclosures and procedural rules.
Deadline for Filing Motion under Federal Rule of Evidence...
Procedural inquiry regarding Rule 412 motions.
Filing of a Rule 412 motion
A letter from counsel Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan stating that Ms. Maxwell will file a Rule 412 motion on or before November 15, 2021. The letter argues this timing is necessary to allow counsel to adequately consult with Ms. Maxwell and prepare the motion.
Response to Government Letter dated August 18, 2021
Defense response arguing against government's objection to disclosing co-conspirator identities and statements.
Reply to Government Letter dated May 14 Regarding Propose...
No preview available
Response to subpoena
Letter regarding response to subpoena
defense witness disclosures
Joint letter regarding defense witness disclosures (Dkt. No. 250)
Response to Dkt. No. 227, Government's April 21, 2021 Let...
Defense response arguing against deferring resolution of suppression motions, emphasizing the need for an evidentiary hearing due to potential constitutional violations and 'fruit of the poisonous tree' issues.
Response to Government's April 5, 2021 Letter re. Ms. Max...
Letter dated April 15, 2021 responding to Government correspondence.
Response to Government's April 5, 2021 Letter re. Ms. Max...
Letter dated April 15, 2021 responding to government regarding subpoena.
Response to Government's April 5, 2021 Letter re. Ms. Max...
Letter dated April 15, 2021 filed on docket.
Response to Letter Motion to Quash Rule 17 Subpoena to Bo...
Filed on docket 04/23/2021.
Response to the Governments October 7, 2020 letter
Defense response to the government's Oct 7 letter.
Impediments to defense preparation for Ms. Maxwell
A letter from defense counsel to the judge complaining that the BOP and MDC are preventing Ms. Maxwell from properly reviewing legal documents with her attorneys. It requests the court to intervene and order the BOP to allow counsel to pass papers to her during visits.
Impediments to defense preparation for Ms. Maxwell
A letter from defense counsel to the judge complaining that the BOP and MDC are preventing Ms. Maxwell from properly reviewing legal documents with her attorneys. It requests the court to intervene and order the BOP to allow counsel to pass papers to her during visits.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity