Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
48
Very Strong
|
120 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
21
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
73 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional employment membership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Employment affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Potentially defense counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-07 | N/A | Order Granting Motion to Withdraw | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Men... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal filing | The declaration regarding the change of counsel and withdrawal of HMF was dated and submitted. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Attorneys Pagliuca and Menninger sign motion to withdraw as counsel. | Denver, CO (implied by sign... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Reply Memorandum | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL". | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing submission | A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-09 | N/A | Submission of legal motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. | New York (Southern District... | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Legal filing | Filing of a letter by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislai... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-29 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE,... | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-28 | Jury trial | Court proceedings for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-27 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 20 CR 330 (AJN). | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-22 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002740.jpg
This is the final page (Conclusion) of a legal motion filed on February 23, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Her defense team argues that additional proposed conditions—including renouncing foreign citizenship and asset monitoring—should satisfy the Bail Reform Act. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002714.jpg
This document is page 21 of a defense motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense attorneys (Cohen & Gresser LLP) are requesting the Court order the government to disclose 'bad acts' evidence (Rule 404(b)) by March 12, 2021, a request the government previously denied. The document concludes the legal brief and is signed by Mark S. Cohen.
DOJ-OGR-00020104.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on December 23, 2020, it is a reply memorandum in support of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document lists the names and contact information for her legal team from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00020059.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 39) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The text explicitly requests the Court to order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the contact information and signatures for her defense team, consisting of attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00020015.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00017363.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated November 30, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus others). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00005665.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a 'Motion in Limine', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 29, 2021. The motion is filed on behalf of the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The purpose of the motion is to request the exclusion of evidence related to an individual identified as 'Accuser-3'.
DOJ-OGR-00005647.jpg
This document is the signature page of a court filing (Document 386) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005625.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to exclude evidence based on Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the precedent set by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and requests a hearing on the matter. The document lists the names and contact information for Maxwell's attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005620.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 11 of 12) of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the Government failed to comply with Rule 404(b) notice deadlines (originally May 28, extended to October 11), depriving Maxwell of the chance to litigate properly, and they request the Court exclude this belated evidence. The document lists the contact information for defense attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005595.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to prevent the prosecution from introducing statements from alleged co-conspirators. This request is framed as a sanction for the prosecution's purported failure to adhere to a court order issued on September 3, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005523.jpg
This document is a signature page from a court filing (Document 382) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information. The document is respectfully submitted on behalf of their client, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005391.jpg
This document is the signature page from a legal filing (Document 378) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 27, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005389.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 27, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding sexual behavior evidence) under seal. It also outlines the defense's plan to serve redacted copies of this motion to the counsel of the specific alleged victims whose behavior is discussed in the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00005378.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated October 25, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca informs the court that the defense has filed an Omnibus Response to the Government's Motions in Limine under seal to allow time to review for necessary redactions, with a public filing and justification letter to follow by October 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002674.jpg
This is a legal document filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated January 25, 2021, the document is a 'Notice of Motion' from Maxwell's legal team at Cohen & Gresser LLP, stating their intent to file a motion to strike 'surplusage' from the superseding indictment against her. This is identified as Pretrial Motion #6.
DOJ-OGR-00002672.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (page 18 of the specific filing, page 24 of the PDF) of a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In this document, dated January 25, 2021, Maxwell's legal team (Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and Bobbi C. Sternheim) formally requests that the Court dismiss the indictment against her. The page lists the contact information for all defense attorneys involved.
DOJ-OGR-00005775.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude the introduction of specific government exhibits (251, 288, 294, 313, and 606) in her trial. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00005773.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys request that the court issue an order preventing all trial participants from referring to the accusers as "victims" or "minor victims." They argue that using such terms would violate Ms. Maxwell's presumption of innocence and lessen the government's burden of proof.
DOJ-OGR-00005747.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude law enforcement witnesses from offering expert opinion testimony. The document lists the names and contact information for the four attorneys and their respective law firms representing the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005744.jpg
This is a page from a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorneys argue that a redacted individual's identification of Maxwell should be suppressed because the individual never previously identified Maxwell as an abuser in interviews or under oath. The document asserts that the identification procedure was suggestive and occurred too long after the alleged events.
DOJ-OGR-00005738.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing, titled 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION', lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. It serves as the formal introduction to a request for the court to exclude certain identification evidence from the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005735.jpg
This document is the signature page from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 29, 2021. It lists the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005726.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Motion in Limine' filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The motion seeks to exclude evidence allegedly seized during a search of 358 El Brillo Way (Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence) that occurred on October 20, 2005. It lists the legal defense team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00005722.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 10 of 11) of a legal filing in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated October 18, 2021, and filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text concludes a legal argument regarding hearsay evidence, asserting that a specific record does not meet the business records exception. It lists the defense legal team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, Cohen & Gresser, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-29 | Paid | Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | United States Dis... | $75.00 | Admission fee for pro hac vice appearance | View |
Response to the Governments October 7, 2020 letter
Defense response to government correspondence
Impediments to defense preparation for Ms. Maxwell
A letter from defense counsel to the judge complaining that the BOP and MDC are preventing Ms. Maxwell from properly reviewing legal documents with her attorneys. It requests the court to intervene and order the BOP to allow counsel to pass papers to her during visits.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Defense counsel writes regarding modification of protective order.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Letter dated 8/17/2020 filed.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order.
Disclosure of sealed materials in a legal case
A letter arguing that Ms. Maxwell should be permitted to disclose sealed materials to judicial officers, refuting claims that it would compromise grand jury secrecy.
Submission for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
The document is a formal submission from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
Disclosure of sealed judicial documents
A letter arguing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell for the limited disclosure of sealed materials to judicial officers. It refutes the argument that such a disclosure would compromise grand jury secrecy and asserts that the government has not provided a valid reason to withhold the information.
Disclosure of sealed judicial documents
A letter arguing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell for the limited disclosure of sealed materials to judicial officers. It refutes the argument that such a disclosure would compromise grand jury secrecy and asserts that the government has not provided a valid reason to withhold the information.
CC of submission for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
A carbon copy of the document was sent via email to the Counsel of Record.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
A letter motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell requesting to exceed the page limit for a submission.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion regarding page limits.
No Subject
The document indicates it was carbon copied (CC'd) to the Counsel of Record via email.
Request to modify Protective Order
A letter motion requesting that the Court modify a Protective Order to allow Ms. Maxwell to refer to and file certain material under seal.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
A letter motion requesting permission to file a longer-than-standard motion.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion filed by defense counsel.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural request
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
A letter motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell seeking permission to exceed the standard page limit for a letter motion.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion filed by defense.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural request regarding page limits.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
DOJ response denying defense counsel's request to use criminal discovery materials (Unsealing Materials) for civil litigation purposes, citing Protective Order restrictions.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Denial of request to use criminal discovery materials in civil litigation based on Protective Order and ongoing grand jury investigation.
Request to use discovery materials
Request to use Bates Nos. SDNY_GM_00000834 through SDNY_GM_00000962 to litigate a civil lawsuit.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity