Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
48
Very Strong
|
120 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
21
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
73 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional employment membership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Employment affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Potentially defense counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-07 | N/A | Order Granting Motion to Withdraw | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Men... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-06 | Legal filing | The declaration regarding the change of counsel and withdrawal of HMF was dated and submitted. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Attorneys Pagliuca and Menninger sign motion to withdraw as counsel. | Denver, CO (implied by sign... | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-15 | N/A | Filing of Sentencing Memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Reply Memorandum | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Filing of "GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL". | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL' with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-02 | Legal filing | A document was filed with the court requesting a continuance. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 616 was officially filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a reply in support of her motion for a new trial. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | A motion for a new trial was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 613-1 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-11 | N/A | Filing of legal motion seeking to vacate conviction and enter judgment of acquittal | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of an Omnibus Memorandum in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions by Ghislaine Maxwell's attor... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing submission | A legal document was dated and submitted, requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to exa... | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-09 | N/A | Submission of legal motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. | New York (Southern District... | View |
| 2022-01-05 | Legal filing | Filing of a letter by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislai... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-29 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE,... | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-28 | Jury trial | Court proceedings for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-27 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 20 CR 330 (AJN). | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-22 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020452.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing numerous filings that occurred on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan and a series of letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. The filings cover procedural matters such as proposed redactions, motions to quash subpoenas, admissibility of witness testimony (Witness-3), and evidence related to specific exhibits and accusers (Accuser-3).
DOJ-OGR-00020440.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from November 2 to November 4, 2021. It details pre-trial motions regarding trial length, juror anonymity, release on bond, and evidentiary hearings (Rule 412 and Daubert). Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders scheduling a hearing for November 10, 2021, and directed the government to address issues regarding Maxwell's transportation and access to legal mail at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020436.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) listing entries from late October 2021 regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries detail various orders and letters concerning jury selection, questionnaires, voir dire procedures, and scheduling for motions in limine and jury charges. It documents communications between the defense (Maxwell's counsel) and the prosecution (USA) addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020434.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from October 2021 detailing pre-trial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records various filings related to jury selection (voir dire), motions in limine, and Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (rape shield law), as well as the scheduling of a telephone conference. The document also notes the deletion of an incorrectly filed document and provides public access information for court proceedings while warning against recording.
DOJ-OGR-00020433.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell covering October 13-15, 2021. It details procedural motions regarding juror selection (voir dire), the attendance of alleged victims at the trial, and disputes over the delivery speed of Maxwell's legal mail at the MDC. The document also references filings related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (the 'Rape Shield Law') and includes orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020431.jpg
This document contains a series of court docket entries from August 2021 related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding unsealing documents, scheduling a jury trial for November 29, 2021, and addressing attorney-client communication issues at the MDC. It also logs various letters exchanged between the defense counsel and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00020426.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from May 17 to May 25, 2021. The entries primarily concern pre-trial motions filed by Maxwell's defense team, including motions to suppress evidence, strike surplusage, and dismiss the superseding indictment. The log also records correspondence with Judge Alison J. Nathan from both the defense and the prosecution (USA) regarding document redactions and scheduling.
DOJ-OGR-00020423.jpg
This document is a court docket log from May 2021 regarding the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 and ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives and attorney-client communications at the MDC. The log also records various letters filed by both the prosecution (USA) regarding subpoenas and prison conditions (flashlights), and the defense regarding witness disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00020419.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing filings and orders from April 23, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries, overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan, primarily concern letters and motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense regarding proposed redactions to documents and motions to suppress evidence. The judge grants several redaction requests from both sides, citing legal precedent to balance public access with privacy interests, and orders the redacted documents to be filed.
DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 21-22, 2021. It details legal maneuvers regarding pretrial scheduling, the severance of perjury counts from non-perjury counts, and the deferral of suppression motions. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants government requests for redactions to protect the privacy of third parties and alleged victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020416.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering April 16-19, 2021. It details various filings including defense motions to dismiss indictments and suppress evidence (specifically mentioning 'Martindell' issues and protective orders), and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment. The document also notes the scheduling of separate trials for perjury and non-perjury counts.
DOJ-OGR-00020400.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 detailing procedural filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It logs correspondence between the Prosecution (USA) and Defense regarding discovery deadlines, disclosure delays, and investigative files, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the USCA and the extension of discovery and motion deadlines into early 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020399.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 22-1426) detailing legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell between August 25, 2020, and October 6, 2020. It lists various filings including memorandum opinions denying defense motions, letters regarding protective orders, a notice of appeal, sealed documents, and an attorney appearance by Bobbi C. Sternheim. The entries record actions taken by Judge Alison J. Nathan, the defense, and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00020398.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 22-1426, detailing a series of legal filings and orders from August 10 to August 24, 2020. The entries pertain to the case of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell and involve motions and responses between her legal team and the prosecution (USA) concerning discovery, protective orders, and requests to file documents under seal or in excess of page limits. The proceedings are overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan, who issues orders and sets deadlines for the parties involved.
DOJ-OGR-00020396.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late July 2020. The entries primarily concern procedural matters, including a defense motion to limit extrajudicial statements (which was denied) and a series of letters and responses between the defense and prosecution regarding a proposed protective order. The presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan, issued several orders setting deadlines and warning counsel to adhere to court rules.
DOJ-OGR-00020394.jpg
This document is a court docket page from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the formal appearance of her defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The document also outlines logistics for public access to the hearing via telephone and addresses victim rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00020388.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell (Case #: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The case was filed on June 29, 2020, and terminated on June 29, 2022. The document identifies the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, a movant, Jordana H. Feldman, the assigned judge, Alison J. Nathan, and the legal counsel for both Maxwell and Feldman, along with their contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00018863.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 8, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present from agencies like the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00018599.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 7, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00016217.jpg
Cover page for a court transcript of the jury trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 10, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). Law enforcement representatives from the FBI and NYPD were also noted as present.
DOJ-OGR-00016111.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00002410.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to dismiss counts five and six of the superseding indictment. The grounds for dismissal are that the alleged misstatements are not perjurious as a matter of law.
DOJ-OGR-00002409.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Document 135) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the names, law firms, and contact information for the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys are from three separate law firms located in Denver, Colorado and New York, New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002369(1).jpg
This document is a signature page (page 22 of 23) from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002347(1).jpg
This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 133) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from the law firms HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.; COHEN & GRESSER LLP; and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-29 | Paid | Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | United States Dis... | $75.00 | Admission fee for pro hac vice appearance | View |
Impediments to defense preparation for Ms. Maxwell
A letter from defense counsel to the judge complaining that the BOP and MDC are preventing Ms. Maxwell from properly reviewing legal documents with her attorneys. It requests the court to intervene and order the BOP to allow counsel to pass papers to her during visits.
Response to the Governments October 7, 2020 letter
Defense response to the government's Oct 7 letter.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Letter dated 8/17/2020 filed.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Defense counsel writes with redacted request to modify protective order.
Redacted request to modify protective order
Defense counsel writes regarding modification of protective order.
Disclosure of sealed materials in a legal case
A letter arguing that Ms. Maxwell should be permitted to disclose sealed materials to judicial officers, refuting claims that it would compromise grand jury secrecy.
Submission for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
The document is a formal submission from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
CC of submission for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
A carbon copy of the document was sent via email to the Counsel of Record.
Disclosure of sealed judicial documents
A letter arguing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell for the limited disclosure of sealed materials to judicial officers. It refutes the argument that such a disclosure would compromise grand jury secrecy and asserts that the government has not provided a valid reason to withhold the information.
Disclosure of sealed judicial documents
A letter arguing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell for the limited disclosure of sealed materials to judicial officers. It refutes the argument that such a disclosure would compromise grand jury secrecy and asserts that the government has not provided a valid reason to withhold the information.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
A letter motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell seeking permission to exceed the standard page limit for a letter motion.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural request
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion filed by defense counsel.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion regarding page limits.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural motion filed by defense.
No Subject
The document indicates it was carbon copied (CC'd) to the Counsel of Record via email.
Request to modify Protective Order
A letter motion requesting that the Court modify a Protective Order to allow Ms. Maxwell to refer to and file certain material under seal.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
A letter motion requesting permission to file a longer-than-standard motion.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
A letter motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell requesting to exceed the page limit for a submission.
Request for Permission to Submit Letter Motion in Excess ...
Procedural request regarding page limits.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
DOJ response denying defense counsel's request to use criminal discovery materials (Unsealing Materials) for civil litigation purposes, citing Protective Order restrictions.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Denial of request to use criminal discovery materials in civil litigation based on Protective Order and ongoing grand jury investigation.
Request to use discovery materials
Requesting to use discovery materials (Bates Nos. SDNY_GM_00000834 through 962) in a civil lawsuit.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity