United States District Court Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-09-03 | Court order | The court issued an order with which the prosecution allegedly failed to comply, leading to the c... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal ruling | The Court’s Opinion and Order (the “April Opinion” or “Apr. Op.”) was dated. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to mo... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | The court filed an order granting Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion for admission pro hac vice. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
EFTA00020355.pdf
This document contains a letter dated July 2, 2020, from Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss to Judge Katharine H. Parker requesting the unsealing of Indictment 20 Cr. 330 against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes the subsequent court order signed by Judge Parker granting the unsealing. The final page lists the relevant U.S. Code violations including sex trafficking (18 U.S.C. 2422, 2423) and perjury (1623).
EFTA00020307.pdf
This document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated May 3, 2021. The order grants Maxwell's request for a continuance of the trial date from July 2021 to Fall 2021 due to the filing of a superseding indictment (S2) which added new charges, extended the conspiracy timeframe to 2004, and identified a fourth minor victim. The judge cited the need for the defense to review new discovery and the ongoing logistical challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic as reasons for the delay.
EFTA00020295.pdf
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on April 26, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a schedule for pretrial disclosures and motions, including deadlines for expert witnesses, victim disclosures, and filings related to the S2 indictment. It sets a presumed trial commencement date of July 12, 2021, pending resolution of a defense request for a continuance.
EFTA00020185.pdf
This document is a transcript of the initial court conference for United States v. Jeffrey Epstein held on July 8, 2019, before Judge Richard M. Berman. Key topics discussed include the scheduling of a bail hearing, the controversy surrounding the 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) which the defense argues bars this prosecution, and the government's stance that the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York. The court also addresses Epstein's sex offender status, the recent search of his Manhattan townhouse, and sets a schedule for bail submissions and the next hearing on July 15, 2019.
EFTA00019994.pdf
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on August 27, 2019, concerning the government's motion to dismiss the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death on August 10, 2019. Judge Richard M. Berman presides over the hearing, emphasizing the importance of transparency and victim involvement despite the defendant's death. The proceedings cover appearances by attorneys for both the government and the defense, and the judge's rationale for holding a public hearing on the matter.
EFTA00019961.pdf
A Grand Jury Subpoena issued on August 16, 2019, by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Western Union Financial Services. The subpoena demands financial records (money transfers, money orders) from 'inception through the present' for specific individuals and entities whose identities are heavily redacted in the document. The investigation cites federal statutes related to sex trafficking (18 U.S.C. 1591), conspiracy to commit sex trafficking (1594(c)), coercion/enticement of a minor (2422(b)), and general conspiracy (371).
EFTA00019870.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on July 13, 2021. It commands an unnamed individual (name redacted) to appear in person on November 29, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. to testify in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The subpoena is signed by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
EFTA00019868.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on July 13, 2021. It commands a redacted individual to appear at 40 Foley Square on November 29, 2021, to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is signed by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
EFTA00019750.pdf
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 15, 2019, to Bank of America N.A. The subpoena demands the production of comprehensive financial records (including opening documents, statements, wires, and correspondence) from account inception to present for specific individuals or entities whose identities are redacted. The investigation concerns alleged violations of federal criminal law including sex trafficking (18 U.S.C. § 1591), conspiracy to commit sex trafficking (18 U.S.C. § 1594(c)), and coercion/enticement of a minor (18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)).
EFTA00019579.pdf
This document is an email dated April 16, 2019, from a Courtroom Deputy to the Hon. Sarah Netburn at the SDNY. The email notifies a recipient (Mr. [Redacted]) of an attached sealed order regarding the application to unseal civil discovery materials in case 19-mc-00179.
EFTA00019503.pdf
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued on March 26, 2021, by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to the Interlochen Center for the Arts. It commands the production of student records for four specific individuals (whose names are redacted) in relation to an investigation into alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(a) (transportation of minors) and 1591 (sex trafficking). The subpoena is signed by Assistant US Attorney Alison G. Moe.
EFTA00019291.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on December 18, 2020, in support of her renewed motion for bail. The defense argues that the government lacks significant documentary evidence, relies solely on witness testimony from decades ago, and that Maxwell has strong ties to the U.S. through her spouse (whose name is redacted) and friends who have pledged assets. The document also addresses flight risk concerns, arguing that extradition from France or the UK is possible or unlikely to be needed due to waivers, and cites a COVID-19 surge at the detention center as further justification for release.
EFTA00018878.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 27, 2021, directed to Amazon.com, Inc. regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It demands the production of subscriber records, order history, and billing information for specific email addresses (gmax1@mindspring.com, gmax@mindspring.com, gmax1@ellmax.com, gmax@ellmax.com) covering the period from January 1, 1994, to January 1, 2005.
EFTA00018877.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued on September 30, 2021, by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It commands Insured Aircraft Title Service, LLC to produce all records relating to aircraft with tail numbers N750A and N722JE dating from January 1, 2008, to the present. The appearance date for producing these records is set for November 29, 2021.
EFTA00018874.pdf
A Grand Jury Subpoena from the Southern District of New York issued on August 28, 2019, commanding a redacted individual to testify and produce evidence regarding alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 (Conspiracy), 1001 (False Statements), and 1519 (Obstruction). The subpoena specifically demands the production of all materials relating to Jeffrey Epstein, including text messages, emails, and social media posts.
EFTA00018844.pdf
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 5, 2021. The order concerns trial logistics, specifically establishing that jury selection will end by November 19 and opening statements will begin November 29. The Judge orders both parties to submit a joint letter by October 12, 2021, estimating the length of the trial to determine if proceedings will extend past the Christmas holiday.
EFTA00018709.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum submitted on February 23, 2021, supporting Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail in the SDNY. Maxwell proposes two new conditions to assure her appearance: formally renouncing her French and British citizenships to prevent flight to those countries, and placing all assets (except legal fees and living expenses) into a new account monitored by retired Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. The defense argues these unprecedented conditions, combined with her strong ties to the US, negate flight risk and claims she is being unfairly treated as a substitute for Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00018572.pdf
Defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell requests the Court to order the government to disclose the identities of three alleged victims referenced in the indictment to allow for effective investigation of allegations from 25 years ago. Additionally, the defense requests that Maxwell be moved to the general population at the MDC and given increased computer access to review discovery, arguing her current isolation and surveillance are punitive reactions to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in BOP custody.
EFTA00018562.pdf
Memorandum Opinion & Order in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330) dated July 30, 2020. Judge Alison J. Nathan ruled on a dispute regarding a protective order, siding with the Government to restrict Maxwell from publicly referencing alleged victims/witnesses who haven't spoken on the record in this specific case, and denying Maxwell's request to restrict witnesses from using discovery materials for other purposes.
EFTA00018515.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team arguing against the government's motion for detention and requesting release on bail. The defense argues that the COVID-19 pandemic poses a severe health risk and impedes defense preparation, and asserts that Maxwell is not a flight risk, citing her presence in the U.S. since Epstein's arrest. They propose a $5 million bond secured by UK property and strict conditions including home confinement and GPS monitoring.
EFTA00018373.pdf
Defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim requests Judge Nathan to release the names of 600 potential jurors to attorneys only, prior to voir dire, to facilitate background research and ensure a fair trial. The letter cites precedent involving juror misconduct (US v. Parse) and a recent order from the Charlottesville 'Unite the Right' civil case (Sines v. Kessler) where juror names were released to counsel despite high publicity and security concerns. The document includes the cited order from the Western District of Virginia as Exhibit A.
EFTA00018294.pdf
This document is a Memorandum & Order from Judge Loretta Preska dated July 29, 2020, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to reconsider the unsealing of her deposition transcripts and those of 'Doe 1'. Maxwell argued that her recent arrest and indictment were new developments requiring secrecy, but the court ruled these risks were already considered ('plowed ground') and that she failed to raise these specific objections in a timely manner after her arrest. The court granted a brief stay until July 31, 2020, to allow Maxwell to appeal, with unsealing scheduled for August 3, 2020, absent further orders.
EFTA00018028.pdf
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 30, 2021. The order grants the Government's motion to require defense lawyer David Markus to comply with Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding extrajudicial statements, following an op-ed he published about the case. The judge ruled that although Markus had not formally appeared in the specific trial proceedings, his role as appellate counsel and public association with the defense made him subject to the rule.
EFTA00018016.pdf
Court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell denying the defendant's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to personally answer questions regarding confinement conditions. The order mandates the Government to provide written status updates every 60 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials, counsel, and the frequency of searches.
EFTA00018008.pdf
This document contains instructions for a legal focus group regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines three specific counts against Maxwell: conspiracy to transport minors (1994-2004), conspiracy to commit sex trafficking (2001-2004), and sex trafficking of Minor Victim-4 (2001-2004). The instructions define the legal elements of these crimes, explain the 'preponderance of the evidence' standard applicable to the focus group exercise, and detail relevant definitions under New York law and federal statutes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity