United States District Court Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to Withdraw by Christian R. Everdell, Mark S. Cohen, and Cohen & Gre... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-09-03 | Court order | The court issued an order with which the prosecution allegedly failed to comply, leading to the c... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal ruling | The Court’s Opinion and Order (the “April Opinion” or “Apr. Op.”) was dated. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-09-02 | Legal ruling | The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to mo... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
| 2020-07-08 | Legal filing | The court filed an order granting Jeffrey S. Pagliuca's motion for admission pro hac vice. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00005178.jpg
This document is a court order filed on October 5, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes the trial schedule, noting that jury selection will conclude by November 19 and opening statements will begin on November 29. The Judge orders both parties to submit a joint letter by October 12, 2021, estimating the length of the trial to determine if proceedings will need to continue through the Christmas and New Year holidays.
DOJ-OGR-00002888.jpg
This document is a legal letter filed on April 5, 2021, by Laura A. Menninger, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests a one-week continuance for the arraignment on the S2 Indictment, moving it from April 16 to April 23, 2021, due to a scheduling conflict in Colorado and ongoing evidence review. The letter notes that the government does not oppose the request and mentions that the delay would allow Maxwell's family time to arrange travel to attend.
DOJ-OGR-00002872.jpg
A court order filed on March 29, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge orders that specific pages (129–134) of the Government's brief be unredacted because the information is already public record in a superseding indictment. The Judge also addresses proposed redactions related to the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell, requiring separate justification for maintaining those seals.
DOJ-OGR-00008821.jpg
A letter motion filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on January 18, 2022, requesting Judge Alison J. Nathan to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act for Counts 7 and 8 of the Ghislaine Maxwell case until April 1, 2022. The document includes a handwritten endorsement and order signed by Judge Nathan on January 19, 2022, granting the request to allow parties to research and brief post-trial motions. The filing indicates that defense counsel consented to the request.
DOJ-OGR-00008818.jpg
This court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on January 14, 2022, addresses scheduling in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order sets Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, delays the presentence investigation report until April 2022, and defers proceedings on severed perjury counts until post-verdict motions are resolved. The government and defense are instructed to submit a joint letter by January 18, 2022, regarding the Speedy Trial Act.
DOJ-OGR-00008810.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell on January 5, 2022. The order states that because Juror Number 50 has secured their own legal representation ("retained counsel"), the court will not appoint CJA (Criminal Justice Act) counsel for them. The juror's counsel is directed to review a previous docket entry.
DOJ-OGR-00008809.jpg
This document is an 'Appearance of Counsel' filed in the Southern District of New York on January 5, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Todd A. Spodek of Spodek Law Group, P.C. formally notifies the court that he is representing 'Jury Number 50,' rather than the defendant or prosecution. This filing occurred post-trial.
DOJ-OGR-00008807.jpg
This document is a Court Order filed on January 5, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a briefing schedule for the Defense's motion for a new trial and addresses the appointment of counsel for a juror regarding potential inquiries into juror conduct. The document also notes that the court will not adjourn post-trial briefing on other issues.
DOJ-OGR-00008797.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on January 3, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order directs the prosecution and defense to submit a joint letter by January 10, 2022, proposing schedules for post-trial motions and sentencing. The order also addresses the defense's inquiry about a COVID-19 booster shot for Maxwell, instructing her counsel to follow the procedures of the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center).
DOJ-OGR-00008788.jpg
This document is a final verdict sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on December 19, 2021, for the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The sheet, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan, lists three counts against Maxwell related to conspiracy and enticement of minors for illegal sexual activity. It provides spaces for a jury to indicate a verdict of "Guilty" or "Not Guilty" for each count.
DOJ-OGR-00008708.jpg
This document is the title page for the 'Jury Charge' (instructions provided to the jury) in the criminal case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It was filed on December 19, 2021, in the Southern District of New York under case number S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00008704.jpg
This document is a draft verdict sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the first three counts regarding conspiracy and enticement of minors for illegal sexual activity, providing spaces for the jury to mark 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty'.
DOJ-OGR-00008702.jpg
This document is a draft verdict sheet from the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated December 18, 2021. It lists three counts against Maxwell related to the conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sexual activity. The sheet provides spaces for a jury to indicate a verdict of 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty' for each count.
DOJ-OGR-00011666.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021. The trial took place in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00011622.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court hearing transcript from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated November 23, 2021. The case is United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with Hon. Alison J. Nathan presiding as the District Judge. The page lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense, including attorneys from the firm Haddon Morgan and Foreman.
DOJ-OGR-00005766.jpg
This document is the cover page for a Motion in Limine filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The motion, submitted by Maxwell's defense team, seeks to preclude the prosecution from referring to accusers as 'victims' or 'minor victims' during the trial. It lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell from three different law firms.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017935.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal complaint filed on April 16, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It establishes the case of Virginia L. Giuffre (Plaintiff) versus Alan Dershowitz (Defendant). The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018031.jpg
Affidavit of David S. Stone in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Alan Dershowitz, filed April 16, 2019. Stone details his professional relationships with both Dershowitz and David Boies and describes facilitating meetings between them in May 2015 regarding sexual abuse allegations against Dershowitz. Stone explicitly refutes Dershowitz's claim that Boies stated during a May 19th meeting that Giuffre (referred to as Roberts) was 'mistaken' about the abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014118.jpg
This document is a sealed declaration filed by attorney Sigrid McCawley in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of plaintiff Virginia Giuffre. The declaration supports a motion to compel discovery from Jeffrey Epstein and authenticates four attached exhibits. These exhibits include redacted phone records, Jeffrey Epstein's contact list, message pad excerpts, and a document related to 'Ghislaine' (presumably Maxwell).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.jpg
This is a court order filed on October 4, 2016, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, regarding a civil case (No. 16 CV-7673) filed by a 'Jane Doe' against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein. Judge Ronnie Abrams orders an initial status conference for December 16, 2016, and requires the parties to submit a joint letter by December 9, 2016, outlining the nature of the action, jurisdiction, motions, and discovery status. The document bears a footer indicating it is part of House Oversight committee records.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity