RICHARD D. KAHN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor |
78
Very Strong
|
74 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Executor |
49
Very Strong
|
49 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor of estate |
22
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Client |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Executor of estate |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Executor |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor representative |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Executor of estate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor deceased |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Co executors |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Mary S. Dirago
|
Client |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Co defendants |
4
|
4 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Maria Farmer
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Mary "Molly" S. Dirago
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Charles L. Glover
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Mary S. Dirago
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Teresa Helm
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Estate executor |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Valerie Sirota
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Charles L. Glover
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor administrator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-12 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed by Charles L. Glover | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-08 | N/A | Notice of Appearance filed by Matthew J. Aaronson | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-08 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Valerie Sirota | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Entry of Opinion & Order by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Jane Doe 15 case. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Filing of Opinion & Order dismissing punitive damages claim in Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Entry of Opinion & Order by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Mary Doe v. Indyke et al. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Opinion issued in related case Mary Doe v. Indyke and Kahn. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-04-16 | N/A | Defendants served responses and objections to Plaintiff's discovery requests. | N/A | View |
| 2020-04-14 | N/A | Filing of Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-13 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to file reply | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2020-03-27 | N/A | Filing of Answer and Affirmative Defenses | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-03-17 | N/A | Summons filed in Civil Action Case 1:20-cv-02365-LJL-DCF | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-17 | N/A | Summons filed in the US District Court Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-16 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants' reply | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-03-10 | N/A | Plaintiff served 68 Requests for Production and 14 Interrogatories on Defendants. | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to file motion to dismiss | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2020-02-28 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | New deadline for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (extended from Feb 21). | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Proposed new deadline for Defendant's motion to dismiss. | Court | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Order issued granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within two weeks. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-21 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants' motion to dismiss | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Proposed new deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-17 | N/A | Proposed extended deadline for Defendants to answer or respond to the complaint. | Court | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Order on Plaintiff's Anonymity | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Parties exchanged initial Rule 26 disclosures. | N/A | View |
015.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lorna G. Schofield dated January 2, 2020, regarding the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests the referral of the case to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman for general pretrial proceedings, noting that the plaintiff consents and that similar cases (specifically citing Teresa Helm and Juliette Bryant) have already been referred to her.
014.pdf
Legal correspondence from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lorna G. Schofield requesting an extension for the defendants (Indyke and Kahn, executors of the Epstein Estate) to respond to a motion by Jane Doe 1000. The judge endorsed the letter on December 5, 2019, granting an adjournment of the deadline to January 16, 2020.
011.pdf
This document is a Waiver of the Service of Summons filed on November 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cv-10577-LGS (Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke et al). Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signs on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate), acknowledging receipt of the complaint and agreeing to waive formal service. The waiver is addressed to plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
010.pdf
This document is a legal filing dated November 21, 2019, containing a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to represent Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000 in the case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes McCawley's declaration of good standing, a supporting Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Florida, and a proposed order for the judge to sign granting the admission. The defendants listed are Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of Epstein's estate.
009.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on November 20, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel for the Plaintiff, Jane Doe 1000, in a civil case against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein.
007.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, supporting a motion for 'Jane Doe 1000' to proceed anonymously in her civil suit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff alleges she was sexually trafficked and abused by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing forced sexual acts and the use of sex toys. The motion argues that anonymity is necessary to protect the plaintiff from severe emotional distress, public scrutiny, and potential retaliation from Maxwell, who was described as being 'at large' at the time of the filing.
006.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously' filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 1000, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The filing is submitted by attorneys from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.
004.pdf
This document is a civil summons issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 18, 2019. The plaintiff, Jane Doe 1000, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The defendants are directed to respond to the complaint through their attorney, Bennet J. Moskowitz, or the plaintiff's attorney, Joshua Schiller.
002.pdf
Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 14, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit brought by Jane Doe 1000 against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The suit is categorized under 'Other Personal Injury' and claims diversity jurisdiction, noting Epstein's domicile as the U.S. Virgin Islands. The plaintiff demands a jury trial.
054.pdf
A status update letter dated November 2, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman regarding three civil cases against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke et al.). The letter informs the court that the plaintiffs have registered with the Epstein Victims Compensation Program and requests that the cases remain stayed pending resolution through that program.
051.pdf
A status update letter dated August 14, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman regarding three civil cases against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke et al.). The letter informs the court that the plaintiffs are currently presenting their claims to the Epstein Victims Compensation Program and requests that the court cases remain stayed pending the outcome of this alternative dispute resolution process.
047.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order filed in June 2020 in the Southern District of New York, staying the lawsuit brought by Teala Davies against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The stay was requested to allow the plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative to litigation for resolving sexual abuse claims. Judge Debra C. Freeman signed the order on June 22, 2020, and directed the parties to submit a status report by August 14, 2020.
040.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated April 30, 2020, filed by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP on behalf of the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn). The letter is addressed to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman in the case of Teala Davies v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It serves to supplement a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from a related case (Jane Doe 15), in which Judge Paul A. Engelmayer dismissed a similar claim for punitive damages against the executors.
040-01.pdf
Court order issued by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on April 30, 2020, granting the defendants' motion to dismiss Jane Doe 15's claim for punitive damages against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff alleged she was groomed by Epstein's secretary in New York and sexually abused by Epstein at his New Mexico ranch in 2004 at age 15. The court ruled that under both New York and New Mexico law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor.
039.pdf
A letter dated April 28, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra Freeman regarding the case of Teala Davies v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter supplements a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in a related case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which dismissed punitive damages claims against the Co-Executors.
039-01.pdf
This document is a legal Opinion & Order from the Southern District of New York in the case of Mary Doe v. the Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's Estate. The court granted the executors' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's request for punitive damages. The judge ruled that New York law applies to the case because the torts occurred in New York, and under New York's Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1)), punitive damages cannot be awarded against the personal representatives of an estate.
038.pdf
A letter motion filed by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) requesting a 30-day extension on various court deadlines due to the pandemic. The request applies to cases involving plaintiffs Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Teala Davies. The motion was endorsed and ordered by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman on April 14, 2020.
037.pdf
A letter dated April 13, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman. The letter represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in lawsuits brought by Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Teala Davies. It requests a 30-day extension for various discovery and filing deadlines due to the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that the Plaintiffs have consented to this request.
033.pdf
This document is a legal declaration by attorney Daniel Mullkoff submitted in the case of Teala Davies v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Epstein Estate). The declaration serves to introduce three exhibits into the court record: Epstein's Last Will and Testament (dated Aug 8, 2019), a complaint filed by the US Virgin Islands, and an Affidavit of Service from the case Araoz v. Epstein. The declaration opposes the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
028.pdf
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed in the Southern District of New York for the case of Teala Davies v. The Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn). Dated March 16, 2020, it establishes protocols for handling confidential discovery materials, including medical records and financial information, and sets procedures for inadvertent disclosures and sealing documents. It includes a Non-Disclosure Agreement form (Exhibit A) to be signed by third parties accessing confidential information.
026.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss' filed on February 28, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-10788). The defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate), represented by Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP, are moving to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiff Teala Davies with prejudice.
024.pdf
Legal correspondence from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated February 26, 2020, regarding the case Teala Davies v. Indyke et al. The letter requests approval for a briefing schedule concerning a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. It references prior settlement discussions held during a court conference on February 11, 2020.
022.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 13, 2020, in the case of Teala Davies v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Epstein's estate), in the Southern District of New York. The attorney attests to her good standing in Illinois and lack of disciplinary history.
022-01.pdf
This document is an affidavit filed on February 13, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York by attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago. She is requesting admission Pro Hac Vice to represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate) in the case brought by plaintiff Teala Davies. The affidavit certifies her good standing with the Illinois Bar and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
020.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated February 6, 2020, from attorney Mariann Meier Wang to Judge Debra Freeman regarding discovery schedules in three lawsuits (Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Davies) against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs advocate for standard discovery timelines (120 days), while the Defendants (Co-Executors Indyke and Kahn) request longer periods (140-160 days) citing the complexity of managing over twenty pending cases against the Estate. The letter also touches on the status of settlement discussions in the Davies case, noting that the voluntary compensation program has not yet been approved.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity