grand jury
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Does
|
Subject of review |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
sender
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Indictment by Grand Jury | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury subpoena issued in Chemical Bank case | Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Subpoena of Epstein's pilots | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony regarding victim identification charts. | Unknown (Grand Jury Room) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein indicted by county grand jury on a single charge of felony solicitation of prostitution. | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returns S1 superseding indictment. | White Plains | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returns S2 superseding indictment. | Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Florida prosecutor conducted investigation and presented to Grand Jury | Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A grand jury returned an indictment against Jeffrey Epstein alleging he sexually exploited dozens... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Criminal investigation | The defendant was concerned about the prospect of a criminal investigation at the time of her dep... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | A grand jury subpoena was issued. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Indictment | A grand jury returned an indictment against the defendant for sex trafficking and sex trafficking... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Indictment | A grand jury returned an indictment detailing the defendant's conduct. | this court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Defendant was indicted by a grand jury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A witness (A) testifies before a grand jury about obtaining telephone records via subpoenas to sh... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The grand jury returned the S2 Indictment charging the defendant with transporting Jane and consp... | New York | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A grand jury received evidence and made a probable cause determination, which is reflected in the... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A questioner examines a witness about a document referred to as 'Overt Two' and a related summary... | Unspecified court setting | View |
| N/A | Indictment returned | A grand jury returned an indictment detailing the defendant's conduct, including the cultivation ... | this court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The government presented Minor Victim-3's allegations to the grand jury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A girl who made allegations about Epstein allegedly refused to appear before the Grand Jury to te... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021867.jpg
This page is from a legal opinion (likely the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, given the citations) affirming a District Court's denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion. Maxwell argued that testimony regarding sexual abuse in New Mexico constituted a 'constructive amendment' or 'prejudicial variance' from the original indictment, violating the Fifth Amendment. The court reviews the denial *de novo* and rejects Maxwell's argument.
DOJ-OGR-00021510.jpg
This document is page 6 of 7 of a legal agreement (likely the Non-Prosecution Agreement) between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States. In this section, Epstein acknowledges that breaching the agreement allows the US to prosecute him for federal offenses. He explicitly waives his Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial regarding any delays caused by this agreement and waives his Fifth Amendment right to be indicted by a grand jury, consenting instead to be charged via Information.
DOJ-OGR-00021501.jpg
This legal document outlines several terms of an agreement with Epstein, stipulating that he must waive challenges to information from the State Attorney's Office, enter a guilty plea by September 28, 2007, and begin his sentence by October 15, 2007. In exchange, the United States will provide his attorneys with a list of up to forty victims and move for the appointment of a guardian ad litem. The document also details Epstein's waiver of his constitutional right to a speedy trial.
DOJ-OGR-00021177.jpg
This executive summary details an investigation by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case in 2007-2008. It outlines the initial investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, Epstein's indictment, the referral to the FBI, and the subsequent negotiation and signing of a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Epstein, which included conditions like pleading guilty to state charges and victim compensation. The OPR investigated whether prosecutors committed misconduct by failing to consult victims or misleading them.
DOJ-OGR-00019486.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically outlining Count Five for Perjury. It alleges that on April 22, 2016, Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony during a deposition when she denied knowledge of a scheme by Jeffrey Epstein to recruit underage girls. The indictment also references prior allegations that Maxwell arranged for the transportation of 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019482.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment against an individual named MAXWELL, filed on July 8, 2020. It outlines specific allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation of three unnamed minors (Victim-1, Victim-2, and Victim-3) between 1994 and 1997. The alleged crimes, which involved a co-conspirator named Epstein, took place in various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London, England.
DOJ-OGR-00019299.jpg
This is page 13 of a legal filing (Document 17) from Case 20-3061, dated September 10, 2020. The text argues against modifying a protective order due to grand jury secrecy but argues that, based on the precedent of Brown v. Maxwell, Ms. Maxwell should be allowed to share information learned from Judge Nathan with Judge Preska. A significant portion of the page is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00019219.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020. It outlines Count Five (Perjury), alleging that on April 22, 2016, Maxwell lied under oath during a deposition by denying knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's scheme to recruit underage girls. The document also references Maxwell's alleged role in transporting 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019215.jpg
This page from a legal indictment, filed on July 2, 2020, details several allegations against an individual named MAXWELL. The charges state that between 1994 and 1997, MAXWELL, in concert with Epstein, engaged in sexual abuse of three minors (Minor Victim-1, -2, and -3) across multiple locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. The specific allegations include participating in group sexual encounters, enticing a minor to travel for sexual abuse, and facilitating sexual abuse by encouraging a minor to provide massages to Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019190.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal indictment filed on July 2, 2020, detailing Count Six (Perjury) against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that on July 22, 2016, Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony during a deposition for a civil case in the Southern District of New York. The indictment quotes her testimony where she denied knowledge of sex toys or devices at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house.
DOJ-OGR-00019189.jpg
This document is page 16 of an indictment, filed on July 2, 2020, detailing charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes a charge of perjury (Count Five), stemming from her alleged false testimony during an April 22, 2016, deposition in a civil case where she denied knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages. The document also refers to Maxwell's role in transporting Minor Victim-1 from Florida to New York for sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016983.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court hearing on August 10, 2022, pertaining to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The discussion centers on amending a legal document, specifically a clause alleging that Maxwell, among Epstein's employees, sent gifts to Carolyn between 2001 and 2004. Mr. Everdell argues for the exclusion of Maxwell's name from this clause, citing a lack of evidence and contradictory FedEx records, to which the government, represented by Mr. Rohrbach, ultimately agrees.
DOJ-OGR-00010541.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) outlining the procedural history of charges against the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). It details the timeline of indictments from June 2020 through March 2021, listing eight specific counts including conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts (1994-2004), sex trafficking (2001-2004), and perjury.
DOJ-OGR-00019837.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) argues that the indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell is solely a result of Jeffrey Epstein's death and the subsequent media frenzy, claiming she is being used as a scapegoat. The text highlights that Maxwell was not charged in the 2008 Florida case or the 2019 SDNY case while Epstein was alive, and criticizes the government's lack of evidence during detention hearings regarding her flight risk. A footnote notes that the indictment was superseded on March 29 to include allegations from a fourth anonymous accuser dating back to 2001-2004.
DOJ-OGR-00019798.jpg
This document appears to be page 3 of a court filing (Case 21-58, Document 23) dated March 29, 2021. It lists pending criminal counts against a defendant (unnamed on this specific page, but the charges align with the Ghislaine Maxwell/Epstein proceedings), including conspiracy to entice minors, coercion, transportation of minors for illegal sex acts, and perjury before a Grand Jury. The document categorizes the highest offense level as a Felony.
DOJ-OGR-00019696.jpg
This document is a page from a legal docket (Case 21-58, dated Jan 12, 2021) listing specific federal criminal charges and their corresponding US Code citations. The charges include conspiracy to entice minors, coercion or enticement of minors, transportation of minors for criminal sexual activity, and perjury (false declarations before a Grand Jury). The list includes both original counts and superseding counts (denoted with 's').
DOJ-OGR-00010388.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated April 29, 2022, in which a court outlines the applicable law regarding constructive amendments to a grand jury indictment. The court explains that under the Fifth Amendment, a defendant can only be tried on the charges in the indictment, and details the legal standard for determining if the trial evidence or jury instructions improperly altered the "core of criminality" of the alleged crime. The court cites numerous precedents from the Second Circuit to support its analysis before denying the defendant's motion.
DOJ-OGR-00010056.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript detailing the redirect and recross-examination of a witness named Brune. Brune justifies not investigating a matter further by explaining that a document, which they viewed as similar to a credit report, only confirmed a pre-existing belief about two individuals sharing a name. The questioning then shifts, with attorney Mr. Schectman asking about redacted Social Security numbers on a document that Brune has seen in its unredacted form.
DOJ-OGR-00009569.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing, specifically page 7 of Document 621 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 25, 2022. The prosecution argues that there was no improper variance between the S2 Indictment and the evidence presented at trial, asserting that the proof of a scheme with Epstein to transport minors to New York for criminal sexual activity directly matched the charges. The document cites legal precedents to support the argument that the defendant was not prejudiced.
DOJ-OGR-00009534.jpg
This document is a page from a 2013 legal filing (likely a sentencing memorandum) concerning the tax fraud case of United States v. Daugerdas et al. It details the conviction of David Parse for obstructing the IRS and mail fraud, noting he faces a statutory maximum of 23 years in prison. While this document is included in the unsealed bundle for the Giuffre v. Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cv-00330), the text specifically addresses the legal proceedings and sentencing guidelines of the Daugerdas tax shelter scheme, likely serving as a legal exhibit or precedent within the broader Maxwell litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00009377.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, capturing the testimony of a witness named Brune. During redirect and recross examination, Brune explains that a particular document resembled a credit report and merely confirmed a pre-existing belief, hence they chose not to investigate further despite their past training as an AUSA. The questioning then turns to redacted Social Security numbers on the document and what the witness learned from an unredacted version.
DOJ-OGR-00003028.jpg
This document describes the Government's efforts to obtain materials from the law firm Boies Schiller via grand jury subpoenas for a criminal investigation (implied U.S. v. Maxwell). Due to the covert nature of the investigation, the defendant was not notified. Boies Schiller complied with non-protected materials but required court intervention (from Judges Sweet and Netburn) to modify protective orders in civil cases (including Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein) to release protected documents, which the Government argued for in sealed letters submitted around February 28, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00004693.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A witness is questioned about eight previously discussed victims, specifically regarding whether they had histories of illicit drug use or mental health issues. The witness confirms knowledge of these issues, but the specific details provided in the answer are fully redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00004690.jpg
This document is a page from a grand jury testimony transcript (filed 05/25/21) where Ms. Villafana questions a witness regarding evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. The witness affirms that Epstein paid a female associate $100 to recruit other girls. The witness then introduces a specific carbon copy message pad recovered during a state search warrant execution, dated March 11, 2003, which documents a call from a redacted individual.
DOJ-OGR-00004681.jpg
This document is a confidential grand jury testimony transcript filed on May 25, 2021. In it, a witness explains that administrative subpoenas were issued to telecommunication companies to acquire cell phone records. These records are intended to show 'telephonic contact' between Mr. Epstein's assistants and multiple 'Jane Does,' which constitute 'Overt Acts' listed in an indictment being presented to the grand jury.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity