grand jury
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Does
|
Subject of review |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
sender
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Indictment by Grand Jury | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury subpoena issued in Chemical Bank case | Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Subpoena of Epstein's pilots | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony regarding victim identification charts. | Unknown (Grand Jury Room) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein indicted by county grand jury on a single charge of felony solicitation of prostitution. | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returns S1 superseding indictment. | White Plains | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returns S2 superseding indictment. | Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Florida prosecutor conducted investigation and presented to Grand Jury | Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A grand jury returned an indictment against Jeffrey Epstein alleging he sexually exploited dozens... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Criminal investigation | The defendant was concerned about the prospect of a criminal investigation at the time of her dep... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | A grand jury subpoena was issued. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Indictment | A grand jury returned an indictment against the defendant for sex trafficking and sex trafficking... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Indictment | A grand jury returned an indictment detailing the defendant's conduct. | this court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Defendant was indicted by a grand jury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A witness (A) testifies before a grand jury about obtaining telephone records via subpoenas to sh... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The grand jury returned the S2 Indictment charging the defendant with transporting Jane and consp... | New York | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A grand jury received evidence and made a probable cause determination, which is reflected in the... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A questioner examines a witness about a document referred to as 'Overt Two' and a related summary... | Unspecified court setting | View |
| N/A | Indictment returned | A grand jury returned an indictment detailing the defendant's conduct, including the cultivation ... | this court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The government presented Minor Victim-3's allegations to the grand jury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A girl who made allegations about Epstein allegedly refused to appear before the Grand Jury to te... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00004678.jpg
This document is a page from a Grand Jury testimony transcript (filed May 25, 2021). A witness, likely an FBI agent, testifies about a 'Merged Flight Manifests Chart' created by the FBI based on data obtained via subpoenas issued to Jeffrey Epstein's pilots. The testimony clarifies aircraft identifiers, noting that 'Hyperion' refers to the Gulfstream and 'JEGE' refers to the Boeing 727, and mentions Overt Acts 191 through 225.
DOJ-OGR-00004677.jpg
This document is a page from a Grand Jury testimony transcript where a Special Agent is being questioned about evidence supporting 'Overt Acts 191 through 225' in a proposed indictment. The agent testifies that they obtained flight manifests via subpoena from Epstein's pilot, showing Epstein's travel during 2004 and 2005 on his Boeing 727 and Gulfstream aircraft. The document explains the layout of a chart entitled 'Merged Flight Manifests' presented as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00004674.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury testimony transcript, filed on May 25, 2021. In the transcript, a questioner directs a witness to a document labeled 'Overt Two' and a summary chart on its second page. The witness confirms they have seen the document and understand its contents, which appear to relate to their prior testimony, though specific details are heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00004666.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a Grand Jury proceeding filed on May 25, 2021. It depicts the swearing-in of an FBI Special Agent (name redacted) based in West Palm Beach. The agent confirms involvement as a case agent in 'Operation Leap Year' and testifies that additional subpoenas have been issued and documents received in response.
DOJ-OGR-00033067.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, an unnamed witness is questioned about their contact with Steven Lavelle, stating they no longer speak. The witness denies knowing two redacted female individuals by name but suggests they could identify them from photos, and also denies any knowledge of another girl who allegedly made allegations against Epstein and refused to testify before a Grand Jury.
DOJ-OGR-00033060.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is being questioned about their past interactions with detectives from Palm Beach, including a Detective Recarey, in relation to a Grand Jury testimony that occurred when the witness was 14 or 15. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, drove them to the testimony, and an attorney named Mr. Leopold objects to a repetitive question.
DOJ-OGR-00033059.jpg
This document is page 71 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age on a MySpace page (claiming to be 18) and subsequently changing it to their true age four days before testifying before a Grand Jury. The witness admits to lying about the age initially but claims not to remember changing it back, citing that they had a 'bazillion' MySpace accounts. The page concludes with Mr. Tein asking if the witness remembers Detective Recarey.
DOJ-OGR-00020128.jpg
This is a Court Opinion and Order filed on December 28, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines the charges against Maxwell (sex trafficking of minors and perjury) and addresses her renewed motion for release on bail pending trial. The judge reiterates the court's previous conclusion from July 2020 that Maxwell poses a clear flight risk and indicates that new arguments presented only solidify this view.
DOJ-OGR-00005362.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court filing (Document 367-1) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on October 22, 2021. It appears to be a script for jury selection (voir dire), outlining the specific charges in the indictment against Maxwell, including conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein to entice minors and sex trafficking between 1994 and 2004. The text details the first four counts of the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00002618.jpg
This document is page 6 of a 7-page legal agreement, filed on February 4, 2008, between Epstein and the United States. In this section, Epstein formally waives his constitutional rights to a speedy trial (Sixth Amendment) and to an indictment by a grand jury (Fifth Amendment). This waiver is a condition for the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to defer his prosecution, with the understanding that any breach of the agreement by Epstein would allow the government to prosecute him for any federal offenses.
DOJ-OGR-00002914.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 9, 2021, details the Government's investigative actions concerning "Minor Victim-4" and the "defendant." It outlines a series of interviews with Minor Victim-4, conducted via video and in-person between summer 2020 and January 2021, alongside further investigative steps. The document asserts that a superseding indictment (S2 Indictment) was timely presented to a grand jury in late March, refuting the defense's claims of intentional delay or that the indictment acknowledges the strength of pretrial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00002867.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated March 29, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves to notify the court that a Grand Jury has returned a superseding indictment against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government outlines its intent to explain the differences between the new and prior indictments and address the impact on discovery and pending motions, while also stating it does not intend to seek further indictments if the trial proceeds as scheduled on July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002856.jpg
This is page 14 of a legal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 29, 2021. It details Count Three, charging Ghislaine Maxwell with conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 2004. The document alleges Maxwell coerced 'Minor Victim-1' to travel from Florida to New York to engage in sex acts with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00032919.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated April 20, 2006, details an interview with Nicole Radabaugh regarding an encounter with Epstein when she was eighteen. Radabaugh alleges that during a massage she was hired to give, Epstein attempted to touch her inappropriately, became upset when she resisted, and paid her $200 to leave. The report also notes the presence of a private investigator monitoring a victim's family and the serving of Grand Jury subpoenas for an upcoming session.
DOJ-OGR-00020129.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The court cites her substantial resources, foreign ties (including citizenship in a non-extradition country), history of living in hiding, and lack of candor regarding finances as reasons for considering her a flight risk. The background section outlines the timeline of her indictment in June 2020, arrest in New Hampshire in July 2020, and the previous denial of bail on July 14, 2020.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010576.jpg
This document, likely an affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards from the House Oversight production, details Epstein's obstruction of justice and evidence collection by the Palm Beach Police. It describes an incident where Epstein diverted his private plane to the US Virgin Islands to prevent the FBI from serving a subpoena to Nadia Marcinkova, while simultaneously harassing her and Sarah Kellen to ensure their silence. It also details the Palm Beach Police investigation in late 2005, including a trash pull that revealed Epstein purchased books on sexual slavery and training (e.g., 'SlaveCraft' and 'Training with Miss Abernathy') via Amazon.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010523.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a book detailing the legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein in July 2006, specifically focusing on the perspective of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter. It describes the grand jury's decision to charge Epstein with a single count of solicitation, omitting charges related to minors, and notes the lack of notification to the police regarding his surrender and release on bail. The text also touches on Reiter's interactions with federal prosecutor Acosta.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010521.jpg
This document appears to be a page from James Patterson's book regarding the Epstein case, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the trauma experienced by a victim named Mary, who was harassed by private investigators from Miami and treated hostilely by prosecutors during a grand jury appearance on June 28. The text also lists Epstein's high-profile legal defense team, including Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Gerald Lefcourt.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010520.jpg
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 178-179) from a book, likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich', included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation. It details events in July 2006 involving 'Mary' (a victim), Detective Recarey, and Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek regarding the decision to take the case to a Grand Jury. The text highlights Recarey's frustration with the legal strategy and the lack of communication from the State Attorney's office to the victim's family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010509.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight records, detailing the controversial plea deal negotiations for Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes a specific moment where Epstein's attorney, Guy Fronstin, accepts a lenient plea offer (1 count Aggravated Assault, probation, adjudication withheld) from ASA Belohlavek, effectively calling off a grand jury. The narrator, likely a police investigator, expresses strong disapproval of the deal and the lack of consultation, noting that the victims' families were being ignored by the State Attorney's Office.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021544.jpg
This FBI document, dated May 31, 2008, details the service of a Grand Jury Subpoena to a redacted female witness. The witness subsequently called a Special Agent to inquire about the investigation, at which point she was informed it concerned Jeffrey Epstein. The document notes that the subpoena included printed material regarding the witness's travel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity