grand jury
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Does
|
Subject of review |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
sender
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Indictment by Grand Jury | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury subpoena issued in Chemical Bank case | Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Subpoena of Epstein's pilots | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony regarding victim identification charts. | Unknown (Grand Jury Room) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein indicted by county grand jury on a single charge of felony solicitation of prostitution. | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returns S1 superseding indictment. | White Plains | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand jury returns S2 superseding indictment. | Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Florida prosecutor conducted investigation and presented to Grand Jury | Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A grand jury returned an indictment against Jeffrey Epstein alleging he sexually exploited dozens... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Criminal investigation | The defendant was concerned about the prospect of a criminal investigation at the time of her dep... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | A grand jury subpoena was issued. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Indictment | A grand jury returned an indictment against the defendant for sex trafficking and sex trafficking... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Indictment | A grand jury returned an indictment detailing the defendant's conduct. | this court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Defendant was indicted by a grand jury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A witness (A) testifies before a grand jury about obtaining telephone records via subpoenas to sh... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The grand jury returned the S2 Indictment charging the defendant with transporting Jane and consp... | New York | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A grand jury received evidence and made a probable cause determination, which is reflected in the... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A questioner examines a witness about a document referred to as 'Overt Two' and a related summary... | Unspecified court setting | View |
| N/A | Indictment returned | A grand jury returned an indictment detailing the defendant's conduct, including the cultivation ... | this court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The government presented Minor Victim-3's allegations to the grand jury. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A girl who made allegations about Epstein allegedly refused to appear before the Grand Jury to te... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000785.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against granting pretrial release (bail) to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The prosecution (The Government) contends that under federal law (§ 3142), the nature of the charges (sex trafficking of minors) creates a presumption for detention. The document further cites the Government's belief that Mr. Epstein poses a danger to the community and is likely to intimidate witnesses and obstruct justice if released.
DOJ-OGR-00000478.jpg
This document page details the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein on charges of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking and sex trafficking of minors, citing specific statutes and quoting the indictment regarding his recruitment methods and locations in New York and Florida. It also notes his arraignment before Judge Henry Pittman and outlines legal principles for detention under the Bail Reform Act.
DOJ-OGR-00000473.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues against granting pretrial release (bail) to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. It cites legal statutes and precedents to establish a presumption against release due to the nature of the charges (sex trafficking of a minor) and the existence of a grand jury indictment. The document also references a letter from the Government which claims Mr. Epstein poses a danger to the community and is likely to intimidate witnesses and obstruct justice if released.
DOJ-OGR-00000355.jpg
This is a Palm Beach Police Department incident report narrative dated July 19, 2006. The report, written by Joseph Recarey, details the serving of Grand Jury subpoenas on April 5, 2006, to the parents of a redacted individual. During the service, the parents informed the officer that private investigators were continuing to photograph their family.
DOJ-OGR-00000295.jpg
This document is a page from a plea agreement outlining sentencing timelines, gain time restrictions, and confidentiality clauses for Epstein. It explicitly states that in exchange for his guilty plea, the United States will not prosecute named potential co-conspirators (Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova) and will suspend the federal Grand Jury investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00000268.jpg
This document is Page 11 of a 2019 federal indictment (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) against Jeffrey Epstein. It details overt acts committed by 'Employee-2' and 'Employee-3' in 2004 and 2005, specifically phone calls made to 'Minor Victim-3' to schedule paid sex acts with Epstein. The page also introduces 'Count Two: Sex Trafficking,' charging Epstein with recruiting and enticing minors for commercial sex acts between 2002 and 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00020761.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order filed on April 16, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court summarizes its rulings, denying Maxwell's motions to dismiss charges based on Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement, untimeliness, vagueness, and grand jury venue issues. However, the Court grants Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury counts, ruling they will be tried separately from the sex trafficking/Mann Act charges.
DOJ-OGR-00020755.jpg
This document is a page from a Grand Jury indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically outlining Count Seven for Perjury. It alleges that on April 22, 2016, during a deposition for a civil case in the Southern District of New York, Maxwell knowingly provided false testimony by denying any knowledge of a scheme by Jeffrey Epstein to recruit underage girls for sexual massages.
DOJ-OGR-00020754.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment, filed on March 29, 2021, detailing charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that between 2001 and 2004, Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or his employees arranged for "Minor Victim-4" to provide massages for Epstein. The page also outlines COUNT SIX, charging Maxwell with Sex Trafficking of a Minor for recruiting and transporting a person under 18 for commercial sex acts in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere during the same period.
DOJ-OGR-00020516.jpg
This document is a court docket log from April 16, 2021, detailing significant rulings by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and other grounds, but granted the motion to sever perjury charges for a separate trial. The document also notes the filing of reply memoranda by defense attorney Christian Everdell and establishes deadlines for pretrial disclosures involving Brady and Giglio materials.
DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
This document is page 24 of a court filing (likely an order or opinion) in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text discusses a legal analysis regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials, weighing the defendant's (Maxwell) opposition against the public interest. The Court concludes that the specific factor of 'public interest' weighs decisively against unsealing because the materials consist of summary testimony by law enforcement that is already public record due to the trial, and lacks the historical significance found in cases like the Rosenbergs or Alger Hiss.
DOJ-OGR-00015148.jpg
This document is page 16 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) rejecting the Government's claim that unsealing Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury materials would reveal significant new information. The Court asserts that the grand juries were not used for investigative purposes and heard no testimony from victims, eyewitnesses, or suspects, meeting only for the routine purpose of returning an indictment. The document indicates the filing date as August 11, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00015146.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court filing (Document 809) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It discusses the legal standards for unsealing grand jury materials, citing Rule 6(e) and case law emphasizing that disclosure requires 'exceptional circumstances.' The text argues that the Government's proposal to disclose testimony and exhibits from the grand juries that indicted Maxwell does not meet the required exceptions for law enforcement or national security.
DOJ-OGR-00002359.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is page 12 of a court filing that accuses the government of misrepresentation. The text alleges that the government failed to acknowledge that prosecutors had been approached multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It references court appearances in March and April 2019 and claims an Assistant U.S. Attorney omitted mentioning these prior contacts.
DOJ-OGR-00002359(2).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge it had approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It cites legal appearances in March and April 2019 and references testimony from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (in Exhibits D and E) who allegedly omitted mentioning these prior contacts.
DOJ-OGR-00002359(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge that prosecutors had been approached multiple times by another party prior to a grand jury subpoena being issued. The document alleges that the government and an Assistant U.S. Attorney continued to omit mention of these prior contacts during court appearances in March and April 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00002290.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on January 25, 2021. The defense argues that Perjury Counts should not be joined with Mann Act Counts because the alleged false statements occurred during 2016 civil depositions regarding a defamation suit (involving Virginia Giuffre) and were not made to the FBI or a grand jury to thwart an existing investigation. The text references a purported conspiracy between Maxwell and Epstein from 1999-2002.
DOJ-OGR-00002290(1).jpg
This document is page 12 of a defense filing (Document 120) from January 2021 in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues against the 'joinder' (combining) of Perjury Counts with Mann Act Counts, stating that Maxwell's alleged false statements in 2016 civil depositions were tangential to the defamation case and not part of a 'common scheme' to obstruct the Mann Act investigation. The defense distinguishes this case from legal precedent (Potamitis), emphasizing that Maxwell did not lie to the FBI or a Grand Jury to derail an investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00002239(1).jpg
This document is page 7 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's decision to deny the Defendant's renewed motion for bail, citing the Bail Reform Act and 18 U.S.C. § 3142. The ruling establishes a presumption in favor of detention because the Defendant is charged with offenses involving minor victims, and notes that the Grand Jury indictment provides sufficient probable cause for this presumption.
DOJ-OGR-00002233.jpg
This document is the first page of an Opinion and Order filed on December 28, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York. It outlines the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. The order addresses and seemingly denies a renewed motion for bail, reinforcing the court's previous conclusion from July 2020 that Maxwell poses a significant flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00001948.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on December 10, 2020. In it, a government prosecutor, Ms. Moe of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, argues that the government's presentation is based on undisputed facts from a grand jury indictment, not media 'spin'. She references the indictment's 'chilling' allegations, including the trafficking of underage girls and the defendant's undisputed actions of living in hiding.
DOJ-OGR-00030509.jpg
This document is a faxed letter from attorney Guy P. Fronstin, Esq., dated April 7, 2006. Fronstin confirms an agreement has been accepted and requests the recipient to cancel a presentation to the Grand Jury scheduled for the following day. The purpose is to allow the parties to proceed with the filing, processing, and finalization of a plea resolution.
DOJ-OGR-00021925.jpg
This document is page 18 of a Grand Jury indictment, filed on November 19, 2019. It details Count Six, charging defendants Tova Noel and Michael Thomas with willfully creating and submitting a false count slip to the MCC on or about August 10, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The act was allegedly intended to obstruct or influence an investigation within the jurisdiction of a U.S. department or agency.
DOJ-OGR-00021923.jpg
This document is page 16 of a federal indictment (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on November 19, 2019. It details charges against correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas for falsifying records at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) regarding prisoner counts in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) on August 9 and 10, 2019. These dates coincide with the custody and death of Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00021922.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal indictment filed on November 19, 2019. It outlines Count Two against defendant Tova Noel, who is accused of falsifying a document on August 9, 2019, by submitting a fraudulent count slip for the 4 p.m. count at the MCC's Special Housing Unit (SHU) to obstruct a federal investigation. The document also introduces Count Three, which incorporates previous allegations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity