| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Inmate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jermaine Darden
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Inmate institution |
3
|
3 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Investigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Incarceration death location |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Rivera
|
Detainee at facility |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Gist
|
Inmate incident location |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Detainee facility |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Folks from Main Justice/FBI/IG
|
Investigative oversight |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant (Epstein)
|
Incarceration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Tartaglione
|
Inmate institution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Custody location of death |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Investigative supervisory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Hughwon Daniel
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
NIC
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A grand jury proceeding where the Government obtained records from the MCC via subpoena. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-03 | N/A | MCC provided the Government with the preserved video, which was discovered to be the wrong tier. | MCC | View |
| 2019-08-20 | N/A | Date associated with the attached letters regarding Epstein (based on filenames 8.20.19). | New York | View |
| 2019-07-25 | N/A | Defense counsel requested MCC preserve video footage from outside the defendant's cell for July 2... | MCC | View |
This document, part of a larger set from the Department of Justice (DOJ-OGR-00025467), contains a specific question regarding the internal communications at a correctional facility (MCC). The inquiry asks what message supervisors have given to 'overworked, disgruntled correctional officers' following unspecified 'charges'. The response to the question is entirely redacted.
This document is a memo outlining questions for an inquiry into the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) following Jeffrey Epstein's suicide. The inquiry focuses on issues like facility funding, staffing levels, Bureau of Prisons (BOP) policy changes, and staff-to-inmate ratios, prompted by reports of poor conditions and low morale exacerbated by prior charges of document falsification.
This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons email thread from July 8, 2019, discussing protocols for Jeffrey Epstein upon his return from a court appearance. Staff anticipated he would receive 'bad news' regarding his legal situation and identified him as having high risk factors for suicide due to his high-profile status and charges. The emails coordinate a mandatory suicide risk assessment and instruct staff to place him on Psychological Observation or Suicide Watch if Psychology staff were unavailable.
This document is a page from a government legal filing (Case 21-58) responding to Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints regarding her incarceration conditions at the MDC. The text refutes Maxwell's claims of sewage flooding by clarifying that the cited precedent (Tiffany Days) occurred at the MCC, not the MDC. Additionally, it counters her claim of 'solitary confinement' by detailing her 13-hour daily access to a day room equipped with computers, a phone, and a TV, while noting she requires protective custody for her safety.
This legal document, dated March 22, 2021, is a filing in a criminal case arguing against the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) discovery requests. The filing contends that requests for communications about co-conspirator Jean Luc Brunel, fee agreements with victims Annie and Maria Farmer, Annie Farmer's complete teenage journal, and materials from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program are irrelevant and improper 'fishing expeditions' for impeachment material. The document cites case law to assert that the Defendant has failed to demonstrate the relevance and admissibility of the requested evidence.
This document is page 22 of a legal filing arguing that defendant Bradley J. Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein based on the affirmative defense of privilege/absolute immunity. The text cites various Florida case laws regarding litigation privilege and concludes by asking the court to grant judgment in Edwards' favor on the remaining claim.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity