MCC
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Inmate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jermaine Darden
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Inmate institution |
3
|
3 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Investigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Incarceration death location |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Rivera
|
Detainee at facility |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Gist
|
Inmate incident location |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Detainee facility |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Folks from Main Justice/FBI/IG
|
Investigative oversight |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant (Epstein)
|
Incarceration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Tartaglione
|
Inmate institution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Custody location of death |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Investigative supervisory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Hughwon Daniel
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
NIC
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A grand jury proceeding where the Government obtained records from the MCC via subpoena. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-03 | N/A | MCC provided the Government with the preserved video, which was discovered to be the wrong tier. | MCC | View |
| 2019-08-20 | N/A | Date associated with the attached letters regarding Epstein (based on filenames 8.20.19). | New York | View |
| 2019-07-25 | N/A | Defense counsel requested MCC preserve video footage from outside the defendant's cell for July 2... | MCC | View |
EFTA00015972.pdf
This document is an internal email chain among SDNY prosecutors dated December 21, 2020. It discusses a legal issue in the case *United States v. Rivera et al.*, where Judge Engelmayer expressed frustration that defendant Justin Rivera (at MCC) received significantly less access to discovery and legal counsel compared to Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC). The emails detail the stark difference in hours allowed (91 hours/week for Maxwell vs 21 hours/week for Rivera) and mention the seizure of 60 devices and an entire FBI file from a prior Florida investigation in the Maxwell case.
EFTA00015932.pdf
This document is an email chain between defense attorneys (Michael Bachrach and Bruce Barket) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The attorneys are requesting records of statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's reported suicide attempt on July 22-23, 2019. The defense argues this is 'Rule 16' discovery material relevant to a 'penalty phase' (likely Tartaglione's capital case), while the government discusses the procedural requirements (Touhy regulations vs. Rule 16).
EFTA00015902.pdf
This document is an email chain between US Attorneys regarding a judicial inquiry into why Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC) received significantly better legal access than Justin Rivera (at MCC). Judge Engelmayer called the disparity 'terrible' optics. The BOP's explanation was that Maxwell's protective custody status (isolation) allowed her exclusive use of equipment, whereas Rivera was in the general population sharing limited resources with ~80 other inmates. The emails track the drafting of a declaration to explain this to the court by the December 31, 2020 deadline.
EFTA00015602.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between defense attorney Martin Weinberg and federal prosecutors regarding the indictment and arrest of Jeffrey Epstein in July 2019. The correspondence coordinates the logistics of Epstein's initial court appearance, the unsealing of the indictment, and discussions regarding bail/detention strategies. It also touches upon the execution of a search warrant and the handling of potentially privileged materials.
EFTA00014902.pdf
This document is an Urgent Matter Report (UMR) from the USAO-SDNY dated June 29, 2021, detailing the imminent release of approximately 2,700 pages of Bureau of Prisons records to The New York Times following FOIA litigation. The release includes internal memos, psychological records showing Epstein received special treatment and manipulated staff, an autopsy report, and details regarding institutional failures at MCC. The documents were previously withheld due to the criminal prosecution of guards Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, which concluded with deferred prosecution agreements.
EFTA00013455.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the FBI (NYO and CID) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS/SDNY) from May 7-8, 2020. The most critical email outlines the status of the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. It states that SDNY is close to a final decision on charging her for complicity in Epstein's sex trafficking. The FBI confirms they believe she is living in Manchester by the Sea, MA, tracked via pen registers, cell site data, and Amazon delivery subpoenas. Traditional surveillance (pole cameras) was deemed unsuitable due to the secluded location, leading to requests for renewed digital tracking and mail covers.
EFTA00013446.pdf
This document is a crucial email chain dated May 7, 2020, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). It reveals that authorities had tracked Ghislaine Maxwell to a secluded property in Manchester-by-the-Sea, Massachusetts, months before her July 2020 arrest. The emails confirm SDNY was close to a charging decision for sex trafficking and details the investigative methods used to locate her, including historical pen registers, cell site location data, and subpoenas to Amazon for delivery addresses, as traditional surveillance was deemed difficult due to the location's seclusion.
EFTA00013436.pdf
An email thread from January 11, 2019, discussing significant upcoming events for a legal or investigative team. The sender notes that the team assigned to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation will travel to Florida the following week to meet with agents from the original investigation and collect hard copy files. The email also reports on the sentencing of former MCC guard Victor Casado for bribery and smuggling contraband.
EFTA00013337.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) from December 2020. It discusses a legal issue raised by Judge Engelmayer in the case of *United States v. Rivera*, where the judge criticized the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) for providing significantly better access to counsel and electronic discovery to Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC) compared to Justin Rivera (at MCC). The emails detail the drafting of a declaration to explain that Maxwell's privileges (such as 13 hours/day of laptop access) are due to her unique protective custody status and the massive volume of discovery in her case, whereas Rivera is in the general population with shared resources.
EFTA00013329.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a legal issue raised by Judge Engelmayer in the case *United States v. Rivera*. The Judge criticized the disparity between the extensive discovery and counsel access provided to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn (91 hours/week laptop access) versus the limited access provided to Justin Rivera at MCC New York (21 hours/week). The emails discuss drafting a declaration to explain that these differences are due to Maxwell's unique protective custody status and facility capabilities, rather than preferential treatment based on class or race.
EFTA00013277.pdf
This document is an email chain initiated by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, addressed to prison officials (MDC) and forwarded to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Sternheim alleges that Maxwell was physically mistreated during a body search, specifically claiming a guard groped her breast, while another threatened her with assault charges. The letter explicitly links the BOP's handling of Maxwell to the negligence surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in the MCC.
EFTA00013272.pdf
Court order from April 2019 in the case of United States v. Nicholas Tartaglione (Epstein's future cellmate). Judge Kenneth Karas orders the Bureau of Prisons to withhold attorney work-product and legal visitation logs from federal prosecutors to protect the defendant's legal strategy. The order applies to the MCC, MDC, and potential transfer facilities like Westchester County Correctional Facility.
EFTA00013193.pdf
An electronic calendar entry for a meeting held on August 13, 2019, three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. The subject of the meeting is 're MCC/Epstein', referring to the Metropolitan Correctional Center. The location and attendee identity are redacted.
EFTA00013190.pdf
This document is an email header dated August 13, 2019, confirming acceptance of a meeting regarding 'MCC/Epstein'. The email was sent three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00013176.pdf
This document is a chain of internal emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office, the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS), and the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 10, 2019, the day Jeffrey Epstein died. The emails chronologically track the initial report of his transport to the hospital for an 'apparent suicide attempt,' the subsequent confirmation that he 'passed away,' and the significant frustration expressed by the U.S. Attorney's Office that the Bureau of Prisons issued a press release before providing official details to government attorneys or Epstein's family. Later emails discuss a suspicious phone call received by Epstein's defense team regarding the retrieval of his body, which officials suspected might be a hoax.
EFTA00010427.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), the Chambers of Judge Karas (NYSD), and defense attorney Bruce Barket of the firm Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP. The correspondence concerns the submission of letters regarding jail conditions (specifically at the MCC) and court appearances pursuant to a court order. The emails indicate coordination between the defense, the prosecution (Narcotics Unit), and the Judge regarding filings and memo endorsements.
EFTA00010303.pdf
This document is an email chain between USANYS officials dated November 15-16, 2019 (referencing Bates EFTA00010303). The discussion concerns a New York Post article reporting that jail guards assigned to Jeffrey Epstein had declined a plea deal. The officials speculate that the correctional officers' union was the source of the leak to the press.
EFTA00009864.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2020 involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. A Deputy Chief from the White Plains Division is requesting a final copy of the BOP's 'Psychological Reconstruction of Inmate Jeffrey Epstein' and the MCC's response. The stated purpose is to evaluate discovery obligations for the capital phase of the Tartaglione trial. The most recent email indicates that the request is being processed through the Central Office.
EFTA00008474.pdf
This image shows two LTO-6 magnetic tape cartridges labeled as FBI evidence (Item 1B 53, Case 90A-NY-3151227). The labels indicate the tapes contain a 'Master Copy' of a CART Network archive of video images taken from MCC-NY (Metropolitan Correctional Center New York) video recorder hard drives as of June 21, 2021. The tapes are dated July 23, 2021, and sit atop an FBI Chain of Custody form (FD-1004).
EFTA00008426.pdf
This document is a photograph of FBI evidence envelopes containing materials collected from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 10, 2019, the date of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The evidence, labeled as 'Item 5' and 'Misc. Items from L. Tier, Cell #220', was sent to the FBI's Questioned Documents Unit, suggesting the contents include written materials requiring forensic analysis.
DOJ-OGR-00022595.tif
This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding or interview involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Todd Blanche, and David Markus. Maxwell denies ever receiving reports of illegal or disgusting behavior and confirms she was not at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) during Mr. Epstein's death. The conversation also includes a brief pause suggested by Todd Blanche.
DOJ-OGR-00001867.jpg
This legal document, filed by the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues against the restrictive conditions of her confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The filing contends that these measures, including constant surveillance and repeated searches, are an overreaction to the BOP's failure to prevent Jeffrey Epstein's death, rather than being based on any specific risk posed by Maxwell. The document also raises concerns about Ms. Maxwell's exposure to COVID-19 and the erasure of her legal emails, quoting then-Attorney General William Barr's stated interest in ensuring she makes it to trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000932.jpg
This legal document page (dated April 1, 2021) argues that the government lacks any contemporaneous documentary evidence (emails, texts, police reports) to corroborate allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding conduct between 1994 and 1997. The defense asserts that Maxwell is being prosecuted as a 'substitute' for Jeffrey Epstein following his 'inexplicable death' at the MCC, noting that she was not named in Epstein's original indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00000919.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the indictment against Ms. Maxwell is a direct consequence of Jeffrey Epstein's death and the resulting media frenzy, positioning her as a 'scapegoat'. The author contends that the case against her is weak, citing the lack of charges against her in 2019 alongside Epstein or in his 2008 Florida case. The document also notes that the government recently superseded the indictment to add a new anonymous accuser.
DOJ-OGR-00000663.jpg
This court transcript from a hearing on September 3, 2019, details an argument by Ms. Comey against the court conducting its own investigation into the death of Mr. Epstein. She informs the court that an active and separate investigation is already being conducted by a grand jury, Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York, and the FBI. Ms. Comey asserts that such an investigation is the proper function of these entities, not the court, especially concerning uncharged matters.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity