| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
30
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal investigation | A state investigation into allegations that Epstein coerced girls into sexual activity, leading h... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the abortion law. | Unknown Court | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Audit of legal fees discovering overbilling by Gerald Lefcourt. | Jail | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signing of an Addendum by Jeffrey Epstein, acknowledging understanding and agreement to comply wi... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signature of the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signing of an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement by Jeffrey Epstein and others. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-30 | N/A | Signing of an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Signing of the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Unknown (Legal Office) | View |
| 2007-10-29 | Legal agreement signing | Gerald Lefcourt signed the addendum on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Date associated with the signature of Gerald Lefcourt, Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Gerald Lefcourt signs the Addendum on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Date associated with the signatures of Jeffrey Epstein's counsel (Lefcourt and Sanchez). | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Gerald Lefcourt signs the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-29 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez sign the Addendum to the Non-Prosecution ... | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-09 | N/A | Article published reporting on Epstein's legal strategy regarding sex offender registration. | New York | View |
| 2007-10-09 | N/A | Article published reporting on Epstein's lawyers considering asking feds to drop registration dem... | New York | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement by Jeffrey Epstein and his legal representatives, and repr... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-24 | Signing of a legal agreement | Gerald Lefcourt, as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein, signed a Non-Prosecution Agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-24 | Signing of a legal agreement | Gerald Lefcourt, on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein, signed the Non-Prosecution Agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Gerald Lefcourt signs the Non-Prosecution Agreement as counsel for Epstein | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein and Gerald Lefcourt signed the Non-Prosecution Agreement. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Gerald Lefcourt signs the Non-Prosecution Agreement as counsel to Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signature of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement by Gerald Lefcourt, counsel to Jeffrey Epstein | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-20 | N/A | Epstein's lawyers were reportedly negotiating a plea deal with federal prosecutors for a potentia... | N/A | View |
This document contains a news clipping about a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein by a woman alleging he had sex with her when she was 16, alongside printed MySpace profile pages for a user named 'PIMP JUICE'. The news article details Epstein's ongoing legal issues and the defense's claims, while the MySpace profile provides personal details, interests, and comments from friends of a young individual. The handwritten note requests the document be placed in Epstein's criminal file, suggesting an ongoing investigation.
A printout of a New York Post article dated October 9, 2007, detailing efforts by Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Gerald Lefcourt, to avoid sex offender registration for Epstein. The article cites a drafted but unsent letter to U.S. Attorney Alexander Costa (likely Acosta) claiming registration would be inappropriate and have a profound impact on Epstein. It also notes Epstein's past business partnership with Mort Zuckerman.
This document is a 'Second Supplemental Privilege Log' from the case Jane Doe v. United States, listing internal DOJ, FBI, and USAO communications withheld from civil discovery. The log chronicles the timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation from late 2006 to August 2008, detailing the internal deliberations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), plea negotiations, and the drafting of the indictment. It reveals critical details such as internal disagreements over plea terms, Epstein's refusal to plead to anything other than 'assault on the plane,' Jay Lefkowitz's admission that he never intended Epstein to register as a sex offender, and the government's struggles with victim notification and harassment by Epstein's defense team.
This document is a printout of a New York Post article dated October 9, 2007, titled 'EPSTEIN EYES SEX-RAP RELIEF'. It details how Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Gerald Lefcourt, drafted a letter to U.S. Attorney Alexander Costa (likely a typo for Acosta) arguing against the requirement for Epstein to register as a sex offender, citing the 'profound impact' it would have on his life. The article notes Epstein's guilty plea for soliciting underage prostitutes in Palm Beach and mentions his former business partnership with Mort Zuckerman.
This document is the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein, dated September 24, 2007, along with an Addendum dated October 29, 2007. In exchange for pleading guilty to state prostitution charges and serving a recommended 18-month county jail sentence (plus probation), the federal government agreed not to prosecute Epstein for federal crimes. Crucially, the agreement grants immunity to 'potential co-conspirators' (names redacted) and stipulates that the agreement would not be made part of the public record.
An email sent to Alex Acosta on September 12, 2007, informing him that a redacted individual, along with attorneys Gerald Lefcourt and Jack Goldberger, are scheduled to meet with Barry Kirscher (likely State Attorney Barry Krischer) at 1:30 PM that day to discuss a 'proposed resolution' in the Epstein case.
This document is the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government (represented by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta). The agreement stipulates that federal prosecution will be deferred and eventually dismissed if Epstein pleads guilty to specific state charges (lewd battery, solicitation, sexual activity with minors) and serves a recommended 30-month sentence (minimum 18-20 months in prison). It also notably limits the identification of victims to a list not exceeding forty people and requires Epstein to register as a sex offender.
An email dated September 11, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) to Gerald Lefcourt regarding a 'Revised Agreement re Epstein'. The sender attaches the '070911_Epstein_Non-Prosecution_Agreement.pdf' and notes that the revision was requested by Mr. Acosta but the operative terms remain unchanged.
This document is an Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It clarifies provisions related to the selection and payment of an independent attorney representative for the victims identified in the agreement. Epstein agrees to pay the customary hourly rates for this representative, but specifies that this obligation ceases if the representative pursues contested litigation (such as lawsuits under 18 U.S.C. s 2255) against him. The document is signed by Epstein and his counsel on October 29, 2007, and by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (signature redacted) on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta on October 30, 2007.
This is the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the United States (represented by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein. In exchange for Epstein pleading guilty to state charges of solicitation of prostitution and serving a 30-month sentence (including jail and community control), the federal government agreed not to prosecute him for federal sex trafficking crimes. Crucially, the agreement also granted immunity to any potential co-conspirators (names redacted) and stipulated that the agreement would not be made part of the public record.
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Alex Acosta and a redacted AUSA). The emails discuss and finalize the text of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. The addendum clarifies the process for appointing an independent third party to select an attorney representative for the victims and stipulates that Epstein will pay the representative's fees but is not obligated to fund contested litigation against himself.
This document contains an email chain from October 11-12, 2007, between Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), specifically involving Alex Acosta and a redacted Assistant US Attorney. The correspondence concerns the drafting of an 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' for Jeffrey Epstein. Key points of negotiation include the selection process for an 'independent third-party' to represent victims and the stipulation that Epstein would pay this representative's fees, but not costs associated with contested litigation against him.
This document is the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and subsequent Addendum between the United States (represented by US Attorney R. Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein. In the agreement, Epstein agrees to plead guilty to state solicitation charges and serve a recommended 30-month sentence (18 months in jail plus probation) in exchange for federal non-prosecution. Crucially, the agreement also grants immunity from federal prosecution to any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, with specific names redacted in the text.
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility with R. Alexander Acosta on October 18, 2019. The interview focuses on Acosta's tenure as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and his office's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the decision to enter into a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. The transcript details discussions regarding the intake of the case, the assessment of evidence and legal issues including the petite policy, management decisions, and interactions with defense counsel.
This document is a page from a Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007, indicating Jeffrey Epstein's understanding and agreement to its terms. It features signatures and roles of Jeffrey Epstein, his counsels Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, and United States Attorneys R. Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafaña.
This document is an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement, signed by Jeffrey Epstein and representatives of the United States Attorney's Office. Epstein acknowledges understanding and agreeing to comply with the clarifications of the agreement. The document is dated October 30, 2007, with signatures from his attorneys dated October 29, 2007.
This document is an addendum signed by Jeffrey Epstein on October 30, 2007, certifying his understanding and agreement to comply with clarifications to a Non-Prosecution Agreement. It includes signatures from Jeffrey Epstein, his counsel Gerald Lefcourt (dated October 29, 2007), his attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez, and Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña on behalf of the United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta.
This document is an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated October 30, 2007, where Jeffrey Epstein acknowledges understanding and agreeing to its terms. It includes signatures from Jeffrey Epstein, United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña, and Epstein's counsel, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, indicating a formal legal agreement reached between the parties.
This document is the signature page of an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It contains a certification that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez, attorney for Epstein, on October 29, 2007, though it also lists signature blocks for U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt.
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a handwritten signature and date (10/29/07) by Gerald Lefcourt, Epstein's counsel. The text certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the agreement and agrees to comply, although Epstein's own signature line is blank on this specific page. The document was later filed in court in 2016 and 2019 as indicated by the headers.
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It features the signature of his attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez, dated September 24, 2007. The document lists other key legal figures including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt, certifying that Epstein understands and agrees to the conditions of the agreement.
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It features the handwritten signatures of Jeffrey Epstein and his lawyer Gerald Lefcourt, dated September 24, 2007, alongside certifications that Epstein understood the agreement's conditions. The document also lists U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafana, though their signatures are not present on this specific page.
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It features Epstein's signature dated September 24, 2007, alongside signature blocks for U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Epstein's defense team, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez. The text certifies that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It contains a statement certifying that Epstein understands the clarifications to the NPA and agrees to comply. The document is signed by Gerald Lefcourt (Epstein's counsel) on October 29, 2007, and by a representative of the U.S. Attorney's Office (marked FAUSA) on October 30, 2007.
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a statement certifying Epstein understands and agrees to the conditions. While signature blocks exist for Epstein, R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt, only Lilly Ann Sanchez (Attorney for Epstein) has signed and dated the document (9-24-07).
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Gerald Lefcourt | $2.53 | Detailed expense for taxi fare, coffee, and dou... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Gerald Lefcourt | $800,000.00 | Cash taken by Lefcourt allegedly without entitl... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Gerald Lefcourt | Jeffrey Epstein | $400,000.00 | Amount returned by Lefcourt after audit. | View |
Drafted but unsent letter arguing that Epstein should not have to register as a sex offender because it would have a 'profound impact' and force him to a 'wholly inappropriate penal facility'.
Argument against Epstein registering as a sex offender, citing impact on his life and inappropriate penal facilities.
Claimed the prosecutor didn't want to bring charges but did so because of the police chief's "craziness."
Claimed the prosecutor didn't want to bring charges but did so because of the police chief's "craziness."
Claimed the prosecutor did not want to bring charges and only did so because of the "craziness" of the police chief.
Sending a revised Non-Prosecution Agreement per Mr. Acosta's request. Notes operative terms have not changed.
A letter asserting their representation of Epstein and requesting the USAO direct all contact to them.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity