This document is a page from a 2017 deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her past. The witness denies being involuntarily sent to a juvenile facility but admits to lying to her father about visiting 'Epstein's house,' claiming she was going shopping instead. She confirms that she had previously admitted this lie to the police.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. LEOPOLD | Attorney |
Makes an objection during the questioning, stating 'Objection. Argumentative.'
|
| MR. TEIN | Attorney |
Identified as the questioner following Mr. Leopold's objection.
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of the witness going to 'Epstein's house'.
|
|
| Unnamed Witness | Deponent |
The person answering questions, designated as 'A'.
|
| Unnamed Questioner | Attorney |
The person asking questions, designated as 'Q'. At least some questions are asked by MR. TEIN.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Consor & Associates, Reporting and Transcription, Inc. | company |
The reporting and transcription firm that produced the document, listed in the header and footer.
|
| police | government agency |
The witness admitted to the police that she told her father she was going shopping.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A facility the witness was admitted to, which she claims was voluntary.
|
|
|
A location the witness went to, lying to her father about her destination.
|
|
|
The address of Consor & Associates, listed in the footer.
|
"No. I was willing to go."Source
"Objection. Argumentative."Source
"The day you went to Epstein's house you lied to your father about where you were going; isn't that correct?"Source
"You admitted to the police that you told your father that you were going shopping, didn't you?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,394 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document