| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal ruling | The Supreme Court ruling in Giglio v. United States, which held that an Assistant United Stated A... | N/A | View |
| 1972-01-01 | Legal ruling | The Supreme Court ruled in Giglio v. United States, holding that an AUSA had a duty to disclose a... | N/A | View |
| 1971-01-01 | Legal ruling | The Supreme Court ruled in the Santobello case, holding that one prosecutor's promise in a plea a... | N/A | View |
| 1971-01-01 | Legal ruling | The Supreme Court ruling in the Santobello case (404 U.S. 257), establishing that a prosecutor's ... | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a legal affidavit (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing the legal strategies and settlements involving Virginia Giuffre, Bradley Edwards, and Alan Dershowitz. The narrator refutes Dershowitz's claims that a previous settlement exonerated him, clarifying that Giuffre stands by her allegations and that the settlement was a tactical decision regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act case. It also explicitly denies Dershowitz's allegations that attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley were involved in an 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner in 2014.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity