| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Adams
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case cited: Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 (1980). | N/A | View |
The document is a news digest containing two articles. The first discusses the boom in U.S. oil transportation, highlighting the shift from pipelines to rail and barge, regulatory challenges in Washington state, and safety concerns following the Lac-Mégantic rail disaster in Quebec. The second article summarizes a scientific study published in Nature regarding the vulnerability of the U.S. electrical grid. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a production related to an investigation.
The document discusses the surge in U.S. oil production and the logistical challenges of transporting crude oil due to infrastructure limitations. As production rises in regions like Eagle Ford, companies are increasingly relying on trucks, trains, and barges instead of pipelines, causing strain on local roads and requiring significant adjustments to the existing delivery systems.
This article details the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein initiated in March 2005 after a mother reported her 14-year-old daughter had been molested. It outlines the evidence gathered by Palm Beach police, including witness statements, surveillance, and a raid on Epstein's mansion that yielded photos and hidden cameras. The text also describes the aggressive defense strategy employed by Epstein's legal team, including private investigators and lawyers Roy Black and Alan Dershowitz, to undermine the credibility of the victims and witnesses.
This page appears to be part of a larger report (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT) discussing the cultural and media response to sexual assault allegations, specifically focusing on Bill Cosby. It references satirical sketches by Amy Schumer, a monologue joke by Seth Meyers, and public comments made by Jay Leno regarding the volume of accusers against Cosby. While part of a dataset often associated with Epstein investigations, this specific page focuses entirely on the Cosby scandal as a cultural reference point.
This article details the Palm Beach police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein initiated in March 2005 after a mother reported her 14-year-old daughter had been molested. It outlines police surveillance tactics, the recruitment role of Haley Robson, and the subsequent interference by Epstein's private investigators and legal team, including Roy Black and Alan Dershowitz. The document also highlights Epstein's lavish lifestyle, charitable donations to local police, and past associations with figures like Donald Trump and Michael Stroll.
This page is an excerpt from a political analysis or essay (possibly an attachment in a larger correspondence) discussing the inherent 'revolutionary' nature of American society and its impact on foreign policy. It argues that cultural and economic forces (like the Internet, NGOs, and businesses) undermine conservative regimes in places like Saudi Arabia, Russia, and China, regardless of official government policy. The document bears a House Oversight footer.
This document, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031769, contains text describing the dismissal of a defamation lawsuit filed by Stormy Daniels against Donald Trump by a federal judge in California. It includes the text of a tweet by Donald Trump celebrating the dismissal and insulting Daniels and her lawyer, as well as a response tweet from attorney Michael Avenatti calling Trump a misogynist and a liar. The document appears to be a media clipping or summary included in House Oversight Committee records.
This document appears to be a page from a political risk or market analysis report distributed via email by IND-X Advisors Limited. It analyzes the incoming Trump administration's energy policies, predicting a strong shift toward fossil fuels, climate change denial, and deregulation driven by figures like Tom Pyle, the Koch Brothers, and Steve Bannon. The text highlights the potential economic resurgence of specific oil and gas-producing states.
This document appears to be a political strategy memo or email analysis from late 2016 detailing the influence of the Koch Brothers on the incoming Trump administration transition team. It highlights numerous staff members with Koch ties, analyzes the appointment of Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State in relation to Russian sanctions and oil deals, and outlines a predicted aggressive rollback of environmental regulations and climate policies.
This document is page 37 of a legal filing submitted to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (indicated by the footer). The content is an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) containing footnotes 178-187, which discuss the history of sexual assault legislation, the backlog of untested rape kits, the evolution of 'rape shield' laws, and the efficacy of specialized prosecution units for sexual crimes and prison abuse. While the text discusses general legal precedents and statistics regarding sexual assault, its submission by Schoen suggests relevance to a specific investigation, likely regarding the handling of sexual abuse cases.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
This page from a law review article discusses the historical evolution of public versus private prosecution in the United States compared to England. It notes that while private prosecution has largely vanished in the U.S. in favor of public prosecutors, some states like Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire retain vestiges of it. The footnotes provide legal citations regarding victims' rights statutes and case law.
This document contains a series of four charts comparing polling or sentiment data for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Presidential Debates. The data covers four states (California, Texas, North Carolina, and Florida) and tracks percentage points across the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd debates. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document is a page of footnotes (numbers 57-72) from a legal or tax analysis document produced for the House Oversight Committee. It cites various tax regulations (Reg 1.752, Reg 1.881), treatises on partnership taxation from 2009, and specific rulings regarding Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and Disregarded Entities (DREs). The content focuses on the technical tax treatment of pass-through entities across various US states.
This document appears to be a printout of a 'listicle' or historical facts presentation (specifically item #23 presumably, followed by header #24) produced during a House Oversight investigation. It describes the 1947 SS Grandcamp explosion in Texas City and introduces a subsequent section about Soviet soldiers. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the visible text contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or his operations.
An email correspondence from 'Bob' (likely biologist Robert Trivers) to an associate of the 'ELF' (likely Epstein's foundation). The email discusses a potential funding proposal, the author's failure to get hired at Texas A&M due to controversy surrounding his research on honor killings and beauty metrics, and includes a graphic sexual anecdote about a woman he met in New Orleans regarding transsexual fantasies.
This document is page 54 of a report (likely from the House Oversight Committee, given the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT') containing endnotes/references numbered 6 through 21. The citations focus heavily on Chinese political influence in American higher education, specifically regarding Confucius Institutes, the 'Hanban,' and interference on U.S. campuses. While the document is part of a larger dataset often associated with investigations, this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document appears to be a page from a legal brief or memorandum submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (indicated by the Bates stamp). The text discusses legal precedents and statutes (specifically the CVRA and state laws in Utah, Oregon, South Dakota, and Texas) regarding a prosecutor's ethical obligation to inform the court of a victim's request to be heard during plea bargain proceedings. This is likely part of an argument regarding the violation of victims' rights in the context of the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement.
This page from a legal document argues that prosecutors are best situated to notify crime victims of proceedings due to their working relationship and the victims' lack of familiarity with the legal system. It references the 2000 Attorney General Guidelines requiring notification of specific events and provides extensive footnotes citing state statutes that follow this approach.
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 14 of 52 in the specific filing) discussing proposals to amend legal rules to incorporate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Rule 2 to ensure fairness to victims and adding a Rule 10.1 regarding notice of proceedings. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as part of a legal argument or evidence file regarding victim rights and notification procedures in the Epstein investigation.
This document is a presentation slide (page 14) from Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs, authored by Francis J. Kelly. It outlines a schedule of United States primary elections/caucuses spanning from January 18th to March 22nd (likely referencing the 2016 election cycle based on the 'Super Tuesday' date of March 1st). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation involving Deutsche Bank.
This document is a slide (page 10) from a Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs presentation stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026804', likely produced during a congressional investigation. It analyzes the field of candidates for the 2016 US Presidential election, categorizing them by party and striking through names of individuals who had suspended their campaigns or declined to run (such as Joe Biden, Scott Walker, and Rick Perry). The slide poses the question of whether it will be a 'multi-billion dollar race' and lists Francis J. Kelly as the Deutsche Bank contact.
This page from a court opinion discusses motions to dismiss regarding jurisdiction over Saudi princes and the Rabita Trust in litigation related to the September 11, 2001 attacks. The court grants the motions to dismiss for Prince Salman and Prince Naif due to a lack of minimum contacts with the United States necessary for personal jurisdiction. The document also begins discussing allegations against the Rabita Trust, including its designation as a terrorist entity and alleged ties to al Qaeda.
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) discussing the court's jurisdiction over Saudi defendants Prince Salman and Prince Naif. It details plaintiffs' arguments that Prince Salman funded terrorist-linked entities (IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and establishes his contacts with the U.S., including stock ownership in Texas and a 1989 meeting with George H.W. Bush. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
This page from a legal opinion (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) addresses motions to dismiss in the Ashton and Burnett cases involving terrorism allegations. The court dismisses claims against Al Baraka and Mr. Kamel due to insufficient factual allegations, denies NCB's motion to dismiss without prejudice pending discovery on immunity and jurisdiction, and allows limited jurisdictional discovery regarding the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity