New York Times
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Adam Dean
|
Photographer for |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MATTHEW SEDACCA
|
Author publisher |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Apple
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Doug Mills
|
Photographer for |
5
|
1 |
EFTA00018466.pdf
This document is a collection of news clips from July 31, 2019, primarily focusing on Jeffrey Epstein. It details his unusual dream of seeding the human race with his DNA, his long-standing fascination with transhumanism and eugenics, and his cultivation of relationships with prominent scientists through financial backing and social events. The articles also mention various scientists who attended his gatherings, their impressions of him, and the financial transactions made by Epstein's foundations to related organizations and individuals.
EFTA00018384.pdf
This document is an email containing the full text of a New York Times article from July 19, 2019, detailing Judge Richard M. Berman's decision to deny Jeffrey Epstein bail. The article outlines the judge's reasoning, citing Epstein as a flight risk due to his immense wealth ($559 million in assets) and international properties, and a danger to the community due to his 'uncontrollable' fixation on minors. It also details items found in his safe, including a fake Austrian passport and cash, and alleges witness tampering via wire transfers and threats.
EFTA00018256.pdf
This document is an email dated October 29, 2020, containing a daily press clipping compilation for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It lists URL links to news stories from various outlets (Fox, NY Post, NYT, etc.) categorized by subject, including updates on the Ghislaine Maxwell case, the Najibullah kidnapping case, and the Lev Parnas/David Correia case. It also includes a 'Matters of Interest' section covering broader legal and political news stories.
EFTA00018170.pdf
This document is an email chain involving personnel likely from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), dated July 10-11, 2019. The discussion focuses on finding a contact at Deutsche Bank and sharing a New York Times article regarding Jeffrey Epstein's net worth. Additionally, a participant suggests reaching out to 'Hoffenberg' (likely Steven Hoffenberg) as part of the investigation.
EFTA00018155.pdf
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated July 8, 2019, circulating a New York Times article. The article details the unsealing of a sex trafficking indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, the seizure of nude photos from his Manhattan mansion, and U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman's statement that the new charges are not bound by the controversial 2008 non-prosecution agreement overseen by Alexander Acosta.
EFTA00017109.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing in the case of United States v. Nicholas Tartaglione. The proceedings focus on a motion by media organizations (NY Post, Daily News, NY Times) to unseal letters regarding Tartaglione's housing conditions at the MCC and MDC. The Judge rules against the Bureau of Prisons and orders the letters unsealed, citing the public interest in BOP conditions and the fact that Tartaglione's background (and connection to the Epstein incident) is already public knowledge. The hearing also touches on trial scheduling and the government's decision not to seek a warrant for a specific telephone.
EFTA00017042.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between the U.S. Department of Justice (Southern District of New York) and Gary Bloxsome, the attorney representing Prince Andrew (Duke of York), spanning January to February 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence deteriorates into a dispute over confidentiality after US Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly states that Prince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation,' which Bloxsome argues violates previous assurances of confidentiality and misrepresents the Duke's willingness to cooperate.
EFTA00015713.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The discussion centers on a New York Times article linking Jeffrey Epstein to Deutsche Bank. One official confirms that they are already receiving documents from Deutsche Bank pursuant to a subpoena and that a review is underway. Another official mentions a 'DB AML [Deutsche Bank Anti-Money Laundering] investigation' that overlaps with the current inquiry and plans to coordinate with the 'PC team' (likely Public Corruption).
EFTA00015712.pdf
An email exchange dated July 23, 2019, discussing a New York Times article about Jeffrey Epstein moving money overseas via Deutsche Bank transactions flagged to the U.S. authorities. The sender confirms that their 'Team was already on it' and notes that 'McFadden' (likely a journalist) has discussed the matter in an interview.
EFTA00015631.pdf
An email sent on July 11, 2019, by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The sender shares a New York Times article about Jeffrey Epstein's net worth with the subject line 'Deutsche!', implying a connection to Deutsche Bank, and comments 'Did I call it or did I call it'.
EFTA00015511.pdf
This document is a legal index (Vaughn Index) filed on January 15, 2021, in the case New York Times v. Bureau of Prisons. It lists 60 entries of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration, his July 23, 2019 suicide attempt, and his August 10, 2019 death, which the BOP withheld from FOIA requests. The withheld items include incident reports, psychological reconstructions, overtime logs, thousands of emails, video/photo sheets, and medical records.
EFTA00014243.pdf
This document is a compilation of 'SDNY News Clips' from March 9, 2020, summarizing major legal news relevant to the Southern District of New York. Key stories include Prince Andrew's refusal to cooperate in the Epstein investigation, the transfer of the MCC jail captain following Epstein's suicide, a massive horse racing doping indictment involving high-profile trainers, the hung jury in the Joshua Schulte CIA leak trial, and internal DOJ conflicts between U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman and Attorney General William Barr. It also touches on Harvey Weinstein's injury in jail and new court restrictions due to the emerging Coronavirus outbreak. No flight logs were present in the document.
EFTA00013989.pdf
This document is a letter from Kenneth Starr to a high-ranking DOJ official arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Starr alleges significant prosecutorial misconduct, including violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), leaks to the New York Times, and conflicts of interest within the US Attorney's Office. He claims the prosecution is politically motivated by Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and requests a 'de novo' independent review of the case.
EFTA00013661.pdf
An email chain concluding with a formal letter from Jay Lefkowitz (Epstein's attorney) to Alex [Acosta] (US Attorney). Lefkowitz argues against federal prosecution, claiming 'Main Justice' is not directing it and that it would be a 'novel application' of statutes. He cites witness testimony alleging women lied about their ages to Epstein and that the FBI pressured women to identify as victims. He requests a meeting to resolve the matter before a July 8 state court deadline.
EFTA00011115.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues that due to 'tsunami' of negative pretrial publicity surrounding Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein (including books, podcasts, and documentaries), standard jury selection is insufficient. They request the Court allow individual sequestered voir dire and limited attorney-conducted questioning to identify and remove biased jurors.
EFTA00011096.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues for individual sequestered voir dire (jury selection questioning) and permission for attorneys to conduct limited questioning of jurors, citing 'tsunami' levels of negative pretrial publicity and the inflammatory nature of the sexual abuse charges. The motion lists numerous documentaries, podcasts, and books as evidence of prejudicial media coverage that allegedly demonizes Maxwell and links her inextricably to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
EFTA00009116.pdf
This document is a transcript of a deposition or interview with R. Alexander Acosta, conducted by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The transcript covers discussions about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), victim notification issues, internal Department of Justice communications, and interactions with Epstein's defense team, including Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz. Acosta defends his office's decisions, emphasizing the goal of securing sex offender registration and restitution, while addressing criticisms regarding the perceived leniency and lack of transparency with victims.
EFTA00000473.pdf
The document consists of a drafted letter from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team to 'Alex' (likely U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta) and a handwritten note. The letter aggressively argues against federal prosecution, alleging misconduct by prosecutors David Weinstein and Marie Villafana, including leaks to the press (NYT, Palm Beach Post) and breaches of the U.S. Attorneys Manual. It references Ken Starr's outrage and argues that sex trafficking statutes are 'patently unfair' to Epstein, pushing for a resolution that avoids federal charges.
DOJ-OGR-00001401.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details grievances including the persistence of mail delays (specifically a FedEx package with a discovery disc), the serving of moldy food, sleep deprivation due to constant lighting and flashlight checks, and the deletion of legal emails via CorrLinks. The filing argues that Maxwell is in 'de facto solitary confinement' and lacks adequate computer resources to review discovery for her trial.
DOJ-OGR-00016360.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger. They are arguing over the relevance of an August 2019 email in which the witness, A. Farmer, recounts her memory of a 2007 meeting with the FBI. Ms. Menninger argues it tests the witness's memory regarding events in 1996, but the judge ultimately sustains an objection, ruling the evidence is 'two steps removed' and irrelevant.
DOJ-OGR-00002354.jpg
This legal document, part of the criminal case against Maxwell, argues that the government's prosecution is based on tainted evidence. The defense claims the government made false representations to circumvent a civil Protective Order from the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' defamation case, and therefore the perjury charges stemming from Maxwell's depositions in that case should be suppressed. The document provides factual background on the civil case, where Virginia Giuffre alleged Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were involved in a scheme to sexually abuse and traffic her.
DOJ-OGR-00002354(3).jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Motion to Suppress) from February 4, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the government made untrue representations regarding a redacted source who was instrumental in the prosecution and provided information before the investigation began. The text asserts that Maxwell would not have agreed to civil depositions in the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' case without the Protective Order, and argues the court should suppress the fruits of the government's misrepresentation, specifically the perjury counts arising from those depositions.
DOJ-OGR-00002354(1).jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing in the criminal case against Maxwell, argues that the government's prosecution is fundamentally flawed. The defense claims the government made untrue representations to circumvent a civil Protective Order from the 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' defamation case, and improperly used Maxwell's deposition transcripts from that case to bring perjury charges. The document requests that the Court suppress this evidence or grant a hearing to investigate the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002351.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page iii) from a court filing (Document 134) in the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. It lists legal authorities and articles referenced in the main brief, including a New York Daily News article about federal prosecutors declining to pursue Epstein and Maxwell in 2016, and a New York Times piece by Norman Mailer. It also cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
DOJ-OGR-00002351(1).jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 134 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The page is a table of authorities, citing two newspaper articles, a federal rule of civil procedure, and a constitutional amendment. The articles reference a 1980 piece by Norman Mailer and a 2020 report that Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue a case against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2016.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Subscriber | New York Times | $0.99 | An offer for unlimited access to NYTimes.com an... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity