New York Times
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Adam Dean
|
Photographer for |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MATTHEW SEDACCA
|
Author publisher |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Apple
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Doug Mills
|
Photographer for |
5
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00021535.jpg
This legal document argues that a news article alleging juror misconduct is insufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing. It cites numerous legal precedents from various courts, including the Second Circuit, which have consistently held that unsworn, hearsay, anonymous, or speculative reports do not meet the high evidentiary standard required to investigate such claims.
DOJ-OGR-00021534.jpg
This legal document is a court order denying a defendant's request for an evidentiary hearing to examine Juror 50 and other jurors. The defendant's motion was based on Juror 50's social media activity and post-trial statements, as well as a New York Times article alleging another juror had also been a victim of sexual abuse. The Court found the evidence insufficient, deemed the request a "fishing expedition," and took steps to protect juror privacy from media contact and legal inquiry.
DOJ-OGR-00021527.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing post-trial motions regarding 'Juror 50'. It discusses the juror's media interviews where he admitted to being a sexual abuse victim despite checking 'no' on his questionnaire, prompting the Defendant to file for a new trial on January 19, 2022. The document also details a phone call on January 5, 2022, where Juror 50 contacted the Jury Department seeking guidance and access to his questionnaire, which was denied.
DOJ-OGR-00021208.jpg
This document provides a background on Jeffrey Epstein, detailing his career path from a teacher to a financier at Bear Stearns, his immense and mysterious wealth, and his various properties. It then focuses on the high-profile legal team he assembled to defend against allegations of sexual misconduct in Florida, including attorneys Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, and Gerald Lefcourt. The text also notes a conflict of interest that arose when Epstein hired Jack Goldberger, whose law partner was married to the Assistant State Attorney on the case.
DOJ-OGR-00016518.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Espinosa, filed on August 10, 2022. Espinosa describes how they were hired to work at Jeffrey Epstein's company, J. Epstein & Co., after responding to a newspaper ad and going through a job agency. The witness states they were interviewed by four people, specifically naming Jeff Schantz and Darren Indyke, whom they identify as Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00009219.jpg
This document is page 29 of a defense filing (Document 616) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues for a hearing and discovery regarding potential juror misconduct, specifically alleging that a second juror (in addition to Juror No. 50) failed to disclose a history of childhood sexual abuse during voir dire. The defense cites a New York Times article and statements by Juror No. 50 as evidence, while rebutting the government's objections to post-trial discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00009218.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 616) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 24, 2022. It argues that Rule of Evidence 606(b) should not prevent an inquiry into juror misconduct, citing constitutional rights and the precedent of *Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado*. The text specifically alleges that 'Juror No. 50' showed bias and lied during *voir dire*, and reveals that a 'second juror' contacted the *New York Times* admitting they were a victim of childhood sexual abuse but failed to disclose this on the jury questionnaire (Question 48).
DOJ-OGR-00009057.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, details requests for evidence related to potential misconduct by "Juror No. 50." It seeks communications, social media activity, and records of payments to the juror. The document also describes how this juror and another juror, who both allegedly failed to disclose they were victims of childhood sexual abuse, discussed these experiences during deliberations, potentially influencing the verdict rendered by all 12 jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00009029.jpg
This legal filing from February 2022 argues that Ghislaine Maxwell was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct. It highlights that Juror No. 50 and a second anonymous juror disclosed their own histories of sexual assault during deliberations, which allegedly influenced the jury's discussions. The document cites press interviews and a New York Times article as evidence of these disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00013894.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated August 10, 2022, where a witness named Espinosa describes the process of getting a job at Jeffrey Epstein's company. Espinosa explains that she found the job through a newspaper ad, contacted a job agency, and was subsequently interviewed by four people, including Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel, Jeff Schantz and Darren Indyke.
DOJ-OGR-00013808.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Ms. Sternheim concludes her questioning of witness Mr. Mulligan, establishing that he spoke to the New York Times to corroborate a story and that Annie Farmer attended his recent wedding. Ms. Pomerantz then begins a redirect examination regarding Mulligan's memory of conversations with Annie.
DOJ-OGR-00013735.jpg
This document is a transcript of a sidebar conference during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense (Ms. Menninger) attempts to introduce an August 2019 email from the witness to a New York Times reporter to impeach the witness's memory regarding the date of a 2007 meeting with the FBI. The defense argues this reflects on her ability to recall events from 1996, but the prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects on grounds of collateral matter/extrinsic evidence, and the Court sustains the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00010153.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012, which lists publications by Stephen Gillers from 2003 to 2006. The articles, published in various newspapers and legal journals, cover topics such as judicial ethics, the Martha Stewart trial, and judicial nominations including those of Miers and Alito. Several publications were co-authored with D. Luban, S. Lubet, and Deborah Rhode.
DOJ-OGR-00010152.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012, presenting a bibliography of publications by Stephen Gillers from June 2000 to April 2003. The listed articles, published in various legal and mainstream publications like the New York Times and ABA Journal, cover topics in legal ethics and professional responsibility, referencing contemporary events such as the U.S. v. Hubbell case, the Florida presidential election recount, and the Marc Rich pardon.
DOJ-OGR-00010151.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or bibliography for Stephen Gillers, filed as an exhibit in a legal case (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP). It lists publications authored by Gillers between February 1999 and April 2000, covering topics such as legal ethics, impeachment, Kenneth Starr, and professional responsibility. The document was produced by the DOJ (DOJ-OGR-00010151) and contains headers indicating it was filed in 2012 and re-filed in a 2020 case.
DOJ-OGR-00010150.jpg
This document appears to be a page from the Curriculum Vitae or publication list of legal ethics expert Stephen Gillers, filed as a court exhibit in 2012. It lists articles authored by Gillers between 1997 and 1999, primarily focusing on the legal and ethical aspects of the Clinton impeachment, Kenneth Starr's investigation, and the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The document contains Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00010150.
DOJ-OGR-00010147.jpg
This document is page 22 of a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012. It contains a numbered list of publications authored by Stephen Gillers between 1986 and 1988. The articles, published in various newspapers and law journals, cover topics such as legal ethics, lawyer discipline, and commentary on legal figures like Bernhardt Goetz, Meese, and Roy Cohn.
DOJ-OGR-00010146.jpg
This document is a biographical summary for Stephen Gillers, filed as part of a legal case on April 6, 2012. It details his educational background, including his J.D. from NYU Law School in 1968 and B.A. from City University of New York in 1964, along with his date of birth. The document also provides a selected bibliography of articles he authored between 1978 and 1985 for publications such as The Nation, New York Times, and New York Law Journal.
DOJ-OGR-00009897.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a motion filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing that the court should investigate potential misconduct by two jurors. The motion contends that Rule of Evidence 606(b) does not bar an inquiry into Juror No. 50's alleged bias and false statements, and that a second juror who alerted the New York Times about being a victim of childhood sexual abuse should also be questioned. The argument is that failing to investigate these matters violates Ms. Maxwell's constitutional rights to a fair and impartial jury.
DOJ-OGR-00009748.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on March 11, 2022, outlines a request for evidence related to potential misconduct by "Juror No. 50". It seeks communications, social media activity, and records of payments to the juror regarding their jury service. The document also discusses a hearing concerning the misconduct, which involves another juror who also allegedly failed to disclose being a victim of childhood sexual abuse, potentially implicating the entire jury's verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00009720.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 642) dated March 11, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that Maxwell was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct, specifically highlighting that Juror No. 50 and a second anonymous juror disclosed their personal histories of sexual abuse during deliberations, which allegedly influenced the jury's discussions. The page references a New York Times article from January 5, 2022, and contains a significant redaction in the footnotes.
DOJ-OGR-00009551.jpg
This court order page denies the Defendant's (Maxwell) request to investigate Juror 50's social media and to examine other jurors regarding a 'second juror' allegedly abused as a minor. The court rules that Juror 50's Instagram posts were personal and do not warrant a 'fishing expedition,' and that the theory regarding a second juror is unfounded speculation based on a New York Times article. Footnote 5 details a timeline of communications between the court and jurors regarding media harassment, noting that these communications will be shared with the parties under seal with redactions to protect juror privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009474.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or expert report bibliography for legal scholar Stephen Gillers. It lists his publications (items 122-139) between 2003 and 2006, covering topics such as legal ethics, judicial selection, and high-profile cases like Martha Stewart's trial and Supreme Court nominations. The document bears a header indicating it was filed in 2022 as part of the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330), likely as an exhibit related to expert testimony or legal arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00009472.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a Curriculum Vitae or bibliography for legal scholar Stephen Gillers, filed as an exhibit in a legal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330, likely US v. Maxwell). It lists publications authored by Gillers between 1999 and 2000 in various legal and news outlets such as The New York Times and The American Lawyer, covering topics like legal ethics, impeachment, and professional responsibility. The page contains a DOJ Bates stamp at the bottom.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Subscriber | New York Times | $0.99 | An offer for unlimited access to NYTimes.com an... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity