Patrick Ho

Person
Mentions
22
Relationships
3
Events
5
Documents
11

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
3 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
location United States
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Gary Tsang
Business associate
6
2
View
organization UBS
Employment
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2018-02-04 Court ruling In United States v. Patrick Ho, the defendant was ordered detained based on risk of flight. S.D.N.Y. View
2018-02-04 Legal case United States v. Patrick Ho, where the defendant was ordered detained based on risk of flight, st... S.D.N.Y. View
2018-02-04 Legal case United States v. Patrick Ho, 17 Cr. 779 (KBF), Dkt. 49 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2018) Southern District of New York View
2018-02-04 N/A United States v. Patrick Ho ruling S.D.N.Y. View
2018-02-04 N/A United States v. Patrick Ho decision S.D.N.Y. View

EFTA00028280.pdf

This document is an internal SDNY email dated December 29, 2020, providing a digest of press clippings. It specifically highlights news regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, including a judge's rejection of her $28.5 million bail package and a story linking her to Epstein's suicide at MCC. The 'Matters of Interest' section covers broader political news involving Donald Trump, Hunter Biden, Rudy Giuliani, and others.

Email / press clipping digest
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00001173.jpg

This legal document is a page from a court's analysis distinguishing the current defendant's case from several cited legal precedents regarding pre-trial detention. The court contrasts cases where defendants were released (Khashoggi, Bodmer) with cases where they were detained (Boustani, Ho, Epstein), focusing on factors that justify detention such as flight risk, substantial financial resources, dual citizenship, and ties to foreign countries without extradition treaties like Brazil.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001145.jpg

This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing dated June 25, 2018, associated with case number 201cr7-00330-AJN. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases cited as legal precedent, with decisions spanning from 1985 to 2019. The vast majority of the cases listed are criminal proceedings with the United States as the plaintiff against various individual defendants.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002192.jpg

This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues against the defendant's release by distinguishing her case from precedents where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and aligning it with cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho, and a 2001 case United States v. Epstein). The 'United States v. Epstein' cited here refers to a 2001 case from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania involving a defendant with German/Brazilian dual citizenship, used here as legal precedent for denying bail based on lack of extradition treaties.

Court filing / legal opinion (page 31 of 36)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002192(1).jpg

This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text presents a legal argument supporting the detention of the defendant by distinguishing her case from previous instances where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and comparing her to cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho). Notably, it cites a 2001 case, 'United States v. Epstein,' as precedent for denying bail based on dual citizenship and lack of extradition treaties; however, this 2001 citation likely refers to a different defendant named Epstein (in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) rather than Jeffrey Epstein.

Court filing / legal opinion (page 31 of document 100)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002164.jpg

This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 18, 2020. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases, dating from 1985 to 2019, that are cited as legal precedent in the main document. The cases cover various federal districts and circuits, with a significant number originating from courts in New York.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020091.jpg

This page from a legal document analyzes several precedent cases to argue for or against the detention of a defendant pending trial. It distinguishes the current case from others like *Khashoggi* and *Bodmer* where defendants were released, and draws parallels to cases like *Boustani*, *Patrick Ho*, and *Epstein* where defendants were detained. The analysis focuses on factors such as flight risk, financial resources, ties to foreign countries, and the existence of extradition treaties.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020063.jpg

This document is Page 3 of a legal filing entitled 'Table of Authorities' from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 18, 2020. It lists numerous legal precedents cited in the filing, primarily 'United States v. [Defendant]' cases. Notably, the list includes two citations for 'United States v. Epstein' (one from 2001 in E.D. Pa. and one from 2019 in S.D.N.Y.) and one for 'United States v. Madoff'.

Legal filing (table of authorities)
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025257.jpg

This document is a UBS financial market analysis slide titled 'China growth outlook,' dated approximately October 15, 2012. It provides forecasts for China's economic growth, analyzes the impact of the upcoming 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, and outlines positive and negative economic scenarios. The document is part of a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025257), likely obtained during investigations into financial institutions connected to Epstein, though Epstein himself is not mentioned in the text.

Financial analysis report / market outlook slide
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024155.jpg

This is a UBS financial research slide from approximately June 2012 regarding Asian equities (excluding Japan). It outlines a 'Positive' market preference (overweight), setting price targets for the MSCI Asia index, and details specific country preferences (favoring China, avoiding Indonesia). The document includes a contact email for UBS specialist Patrick Ho and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.

Financial research report / presentation slide
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024145.jpg

This is page 10 of a UBS Chief Investment Office report titled 'Key financial market driver 3 – China growth outlook,' dated approximately June 18, 2012. The document analyzes China's economic stabilization, recent interest rate cuts by the PBoC, and potential positive or negative growth scenarios for the second half of 2012. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024145' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation.

Financial analysis report / market outlook
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity