A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on May 12, 2021. It commands a redacted individual to appear at 40 Foley Square on November 29, 2021, to testify in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is signed by US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
This document is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on August 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It commands the Sacramento County Clerk/Recorder to appear in court on November 29, 2021, and to produce a birth certificate for a specific individual whose name has been redacted.
This document is a memo endorsed letter from NY Daily News reporter Stephen Rex Brown to Judge Katherine Polk Failla, dated December 29, 2020. Brown requests the unsealing of court transcripts related to Efrain Reyes, noting that Reyes recently died and is of public interest as the last person to share a cell with Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Failla ordered the letter filed to the docket and set a deadline of January 22, 2021, for parties to respond to the unsealing request.
This is a legal letter from Neil S. Binder of Binder & Schwartz LLP to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case United States v. Maxwell. The letter, submitted under seal, addresses the DOJ's motion to unseal grand jury materials that reference the firm's client (whose name is redacted), arguing for the continued maintenance of grand jury secrecy based on established precedent and the lack of justification for special circumstances.
This legal document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed and issued on December 2, 2024. The court, after hearing the appeal, affirms the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
This is a letter from the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter argues that under Rule 613(b), the court has discretion to require that an alleged inconsistent statement be shown to a witness before extrinsic evidence is admitted, citing United States v. Marks.
This legal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 14, 2021, opposes defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call three attorneys for victims (Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman) to testify. The Government argues that their testimony about privileged client conversations or discussions with the Government would be irrelevant and an improper attempt to circumvent privilege, as the victims themselves have already testified.
This is a joint letter from the prosecution and defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The parties inform the court they have been unable to reach an agreement regarding the defense's request for information on Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC. The Government proposes that MDC legal counsel submit a written response, while the defense insists that Warden Heriberto Tellez appear personally before the Court to address concerns about confinement conditions.
This document is a letter motion dated August 17, 2020, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca on behalf of his client, defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion requests a modification of the existing protective order to allow Maxwell's defense to refer to and file under seal certain discovery materials provided by the government on August 5 and August 13, 2020. The defense argues this is necessary for the fair determination of issues in what is referred to as the "Other Matters".
This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests the court enter its proposed protective order and objects to two specific inclusions sought by the defendant, particularly regarding the public naming of victims.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests the scheduling of an arraignment and bail hearing for July 10, 2020, following the defendant's arrest in New Hampshire, and discusses Speedy Trial Act time exclusions.
This document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on June 7, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the District Court's previous orders denying Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The mandate also notes that any concerns regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, and denies Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, to deny Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The order also notes that concerns raised by Maxwell's counsel regarding sleep deprivation during incarceration should be addressed to the District Court.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, to deny Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The order also notes that Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation during incarceration should be directed to the District Court.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the District Court's previous orders from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, and denies Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that any requests regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be directed to the District Court.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 13, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order grants a motion by the appellee (United States of America) to file a supporting exhibit under seal. This exhibit is in opposition to the appellant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion for bail.
This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. It addresses a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, which failed to comply with court rules, specifically being 'Not Text-Searchable'. The notice lists various reasons for non-compliance with FRAP and Local Rules.
This document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated August 21, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. The court officially orders the withdrawal of Epstein's appeal, based on a stipulation filed by both parties. The order was signed by Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, the Clerk of Court.
This is a court order filed on August 26, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Judge Richard M. Berman orders that the hearing scheduled for the following day, August 27, 2019, will take place in Courtroom 110 at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse. Note: This date is after Epstein's death (August 10, 2019), suggesting this was a procedural hearing regarding the dismissal of the indictment or related matters.
This document is a court docket from November 22, 2021, detailing numerous filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries include an order regarding the testimony of 'Witness-3', an endorsement about providing a video monitor, and a series of letters and motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. These filings address various pre-trial matters such as redactions, subpoenas, and the admissibility of evidence like birth certificates and testimony from 'Accuser-3'.
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 1-3, 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present and remanded, as well as various filings including motions for reconsideration regarding bond and juror disclosure. The Judge also issued orders regarding voir dire instructions and scheduled a hearing for November 10, 2021, to discuss evidentiary rules (Rule 412 and 702/Daubert).
This document is a page from a court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from early November 2021. It records joint letters regarding trial length and evidence motions, motions for reconsideration filed by the defense, and significant court orders regarding hearing schedules, witness testimony, defendant transportation, and access to legal mail.
This document is a docketing notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding case 22-1426, United States of America v. Maxwell. It outlines procedures for appellate counsel and pro se parties to access necessary forms and information related to the case.
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The government states it does not object to Maxwell's request for weekend laptop access to review discovery materials but ultimately defers to the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) policies. The letter emphasizes that Maxwell has already been provided with extensive access, including a dedicated laptop and desktop computer, for more hours than any other inmate.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity