40 Foley Square
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00002261(1).jpg
Defense attorney Christian R. Everdell writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a 30-day extension to file a notice of appeal regarding the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The letter argues there is good cause for the extension as the defense considers submitting a third bail application with stricter conditions and needs time to research jurisdictional issues and review documents.
DOJ-OGR-00002198.jpg
This document is a formal letter from Annie Farmer to Judge Alison J. Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. Farmer describes her personal victimization by Maxwell and argues that Maxwell is a flight risk, lacks empathy or remorse, and exhibits psychopathic behavior.
DOJ-OGR-00001828.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a deadline extension for electronic discovery in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government cites delays with an outside vendor processing data from electronic devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2019. The letter details the volume of discovery produced so far (350,000+ pages) and outlines the timeline of data seizure, privilege review by Epstein's estate, and subsequent warrant acquisition.
DOJ-OGR-00022006.jpg
A page from a court transcript filed on February 10, 2020, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Defense attorney Mr. Foy is arguing for an adjournment of proceedings, citing the need for further investigation and a scheduling conflict with another trial set to begin July 20 before Judge Ramos at 40 Foley Square. Foy notes that the other trial involves a client facing a mandatory life sentence who has been incarcerated for nearly two years.
DOJ-OGR-00021821.jpg
This document, issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 17, 2024, provides detailed instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 22-1426cr). It outlines the procedural requirements under FRAP 39, including a 14-day filing deadline after judgment, verification, service on adversaries, and specific rules regarding allowable charges and documentation for printing costs.
DOJ-OGR-00021162.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated March 14, 2023, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No: 22-1426). The order, signed by Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, mandates that the Appellee, the United States of America, must file its brief on or before May 30, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00019591.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 28, 2020, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court grants the motion filed by the appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, to file three specific legal documents under seal. The order was issued by Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00019390.jpg
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 16, 2020. It addresses two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: a civil case with Virginia Giuffre (20-2413) and a criminal case with the United States of America (20-3061). The order notes that on September 10, 2020, Maxwell filed a motion to consolidate the two appeals, and this document begins the court's ruling on that motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019822.jpg
This document is a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. It addresses a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on March 30, 2021, on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that the filing does not comply with federal and local court rules. The notice lists numerous specific reasons for the defect, ranging from missing acknowledgments and supporting papers to formatting issues like incorrect pagination and font.
DOJ-OGR-00019677.jpg
This document is the first page of a Summary Order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020, for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies the presiding judges (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) and lists the legal counsel for both the appellee (United States), led by AUSA Lara Pomerantz, and the defendant-appellant (Ghislaine Maxwell), represented by Adam Mueller. The order was issued from the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse in New York City.
DOJ-OGR-00010414.jpg
This document is a letter from the United States Attorney to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter concerns the government's motion for the exclusion of time for Counts Seven and Eight under the Speedy Trial Act until June 28, 2022, the scheduled date of sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00004784.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 30, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter, submitted on behalf of both the prosecution and the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, confirms that neither party requests any redactions to the Court's recent order denying Maxwell's suppression motion. Consequently, the parties have no objection to the public filing of the unredacted order and its accompanying exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00002729.jpg
A letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan disputing the government's characterization of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The letter details excessive searches, lack of access to discovery materials, and argues that the strict surveillance is a reaction to BOP negligence regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00020384.jpg
This document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on June 7, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, thereby denying Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The mandate also notes that any concerns Maxwell has about being deprived of sleep while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00020383.jpg
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated June 2, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, issued by Circuit Judges Leval, Lohier Jr., and Sullivan, denies the appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed request for pretrial release. It also denies her alternative request for the court to remand the matter to a district court for a hearing on her confinement conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00020323.jpg
This is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's orders from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, thereby denying Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that any requests for relief regarding her sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be directed to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00005246.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 15, 2021. It discusses the scheduling of motions related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412, which governs the admissibility of evidence regarding a victim's sexual behavior. The document contains an endorsement by Judge Nathan ordering that such motions be filed by October 27, 2021, with responses due November 1, and a tentative hearing on November 5.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity