This document is an email thread from October 7, 2019, between the FBI New York Field Office and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. It details the coordination and revision of a subpoena directed at CapitalOne bank. An FBI Forensic Accountant requests the subpoena, noting they found an account number, and instructs that results be sent to a Special Agent. The final email confirms the subpoena is attached.
This document is a subpoena issued on July 19, 2021, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It commands an unnamed individual to appear at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The subpoena was issued under the authority of US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
This document package contains a response from TransUnion to the FBI dated September 1, 2020, providing credit reports for three individuals in response to a Grand Jury Subpoena issued by the SDNY on August 25, 2020. The subpoena relates to an investigation into violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 (Conspiracy), 1343 (Wire Fraud), and 1346 (Honest Services Fraud). The actual credit reports and the names of the individuals being investigated are heavily redacted.
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued on March 26, 2021, by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to the Interlochen Center for the Arts. It commands the production of student records for four specific individuals (whose names are redacted) in relation to an investigation into alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(a) (transportation of minors) and 1591 (sex trafficking). The subpoena is signed by Assistant US Attorney Alison G. Moe.
This document is an email chain from August and September 2019 involving the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the case 'US v. Epstein'. The correspondence discusses the technical processing of evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan residence, specifically loading data extracted from hard drives into the Relativity platform for privilege review. It clarifies that the data in question originated from the Manhattan search warrant returns and explicitly excludes materials seized from the US Virgin Islands.
This document is a formal legal letter dated August 20, 2019, from attorneys Michael Miller and Martin Weinberg (representing Jeffrey Epstein's estate) to the FBI. The attorneys request the preservation and production of specific evidence related to Epstein's death at the MCC, including video recordings, entry/exit logs, and guard logs for the period of August 9-10, 2019. The letter cites Attorney General William Barr's comments about 'serious irregularities' at the facility and states the estate's intention to conduct an independent investigation into the death.
This document is an email dated December 17, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email confirms the shipment via FedEx of a disc containing new discovery production materials related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes attachments referencing 'MDC' (likely Metropolitan Detention Center) and passwords.
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued on August 16, 2019, by the Southern District of New York to Experian, requesting credit records for Ghislaine Maxwell related to a sex trafficking investigation (citing statutes 1591, 2422, etc.). The package includes Experian's response, a Declaration of Custodian of Records dated August 27, 2019, and the credit profile itself. The credit report reveals Maxwell's employment with 'J Epstein and Compny,' an alias 'Ghislaine Borgerson,' and various financial accounts including an active AMEX with a balance over $100,000 at the time of the report.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The discussions concern protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' materials, including nude images and physical evidence (such as massage tables and plaster busts) seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The parties negotiate the location of the review (FBI Bronx warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), the presence of the defendant, and the use of electronic devices by defense counsel during the review.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence details negotiations over the location of the review (500 Pearl St vs. FBI Bronx Warehouse), the transportation of specific physical evidence (including excluding 'bulky' massage tables and cash), and protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' and 'obscene' electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The defense expresses concerns about missing items, the format of electronic surveillance, and the need for their client to meaningfully participate in the review.
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case US v. Maxwell. The emails discuss the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street to review 'Highly Confidential' materials, including 2,100 nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The correspondence also details disputes over the transport of physical evidence from an FBI warehouse in the Bronx, specifically mentioning 'bulky' items like massage tables, plaster busts of female torsos, and a stuffed dog, which the government argued were difficult to transport.
This document is a photograph of FBI evidence envelopes containing materials collected from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 10, 2019, the date of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The evidence, labeled as 'Item 5' and 'Misc. Items from L. Tier, Cell #220', was sent to the FBI's Questioned Documents Unit, suggesting the contents include written materials requiring forensic analysis.
This document is a photograph of FBI evidence packaging containing materials collected on July 30, 2019, from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, where Jeffrey Epstein was incarcerated. The package is labeled with FBI Laboratory number 2020-01577 and contains items 4 through 5, originating from the FBI NY Evidence Control Unit.
A landscape concept map of Little Saint James island identifying 18 specific features and zones. The document outlines the layout of the property, including the private residence, guest house, helicopter landing, and various themed gardens (Palm, Secret, Dryland, Italian Terraced). The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00002653.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 12, 2024, in the appellate case United States v. Maxwell (Docket 22-1426). Hagan Scotten of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York officially enters the case as additional counsel, joining co-counsel Danielle R. Sassoon to represent the United States (Appellee). The document includes contact information for Scotten and bears the footer DOJ-OGR-00021794.
This document is a page from a court transcript where an unidentified speaker discusses the legal distinction between a deficient performance by a law firm and a deliberate strategic judgment. The speaker uses a hypothetical scenario involving the 'Brune firm' deciding to 'sandbag the Court' to argue that a conscious choice to withhold information is a strategic decision, not simply oversight or carelessness, referencing opinions from the Second Circuit and a dissent by Justice Stevens.
This document is an index (concordance) page from a court transcript in the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.', dated February 15, 2012. It lists words alphabetically from 'petition' to 'product' alongside their frequency and specific page/line citations within the full transcript. The document includes references to legal terms (plaintiff, plead, probation), generic terms, and the acronym 'PMD' (likely referring to the defendant, Paul M. Daugerdas).
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on February 24, 2022. The dialogue involves 'The Court' and attorney Mr. Shechtman discussing the conduct of lawyers named Brune and Richard. The debate centers on whether the lawyers' 'lack of candor' was due to carelessness or a strategic decision to 'game the system' and conceal information from the court.
This document is a court transcript page where a speaker, identified as CAC3PARC, is addressing a judge ('Your Honor'). The speaker analyzes the actions of an unnamed woman who, along with her two senior colleagues, failed to report critical information to the court during a trial, an act the speaker and judge agree was a 'tragic misjudgment'. The speaker argues that an investigation should have occurred or the court should have been immediately notified, but instead, the issue was dismissed and a new juror was later substituted without anyone connecting the events.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on February 24, 2022. An unidentified speaker is arguing about whether the actions of the 'Brune firm' on May 12, 2011, constituted a deliberate 'strategic judgment' or were simply 'inattention or neglect.' The speaker references legal definitions and precedents from Justice Stevens, the Second Circuit, and the Supreme Court to support their argument.
This document is page A37 of 46 from Donald J. Trump's OGE Form 278e financial disclosure. It lists the ownership structures, percentages, and parent entities for various Trump organizations, specifically those numbered 441 through 451. The entities primarily relate to developments in Toronto, Trump Tower management, Vineyard Estates, and Virginia acquisitions, with ownership often held through DJT Holdings LLC or The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust.
This document is page A2 of 46 from a House Oversight Committee record (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016742), specifically an OGE Form 278e Financial Disclosure filed by Donald J. Trump. It details the ownership structures, percentages, and roles for numerous corporate entities, including 'Trump Payroll Chicago,' '809 North Canon,' 'Aviation Payroll Company,' and various 'Beach Haven' properties. The document outlines complex holding structures involving 'DJT Holdings LLC,' 'The Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust,' and 'Trump Family Members.'
This document is Page 41 of 42 from Donald J. Trump's OGE Form 278e financial disclosure (likely filed around 2018/2019), detailing Part 8: Liabilities. It lists 14 significant debts including mortgages and loans for properties such as Trump Tower, Trump National Doral, and the Old Post Office. Major creditors include Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and Ladder Capital Finance LLC, with amounts ranging from $5 million to over $50 million per line item.
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 6-9) in which a witness (likely Scott Rothstein) admits to starting a Ponzi scheme around 2005 out of 'greed and the need to support the law firm.' The testimony details the history of his law firm's locations (One Financial Plaza, Colonial Bank Building, 401 Building) and partners (Stu Rosenfeldt, Susan Dolin, Michael Pancier). The witness clarifies that despite having approximately 70 attorneys and various people with 'partner' or 'shareholder' titles for 'prestige' and 'ego,' the only actual equity shareholders receiving distributions were himself and Stu Rosenfeldt.
This document appears to be a schedule or itinerary page, marked with a House Oversight Bates number, listing consecutive events for the 'Spring 2011' fashion season (likely occurring in September 2010). It details five fashion shows (Tory Burch, Michael Kors, Nanette Lepore, Douglas Hannant, Jeremy Scott) occurring in New York City, and one charity fundraiser for Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center in Great Neck. The document includes specific times, locations, addresses, and RSVP contact information for each event.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity