| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Nicholas Biase
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Stewart
|
Employment |
1
|
1 |
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing, likely a brief or memo, discussing the limited scope of various agreements made by different United States Attorney's Offices and divisions of the Department of Justice. It references several legal cases, including United States v. Lafarge S.A., United States v. Goldfield, United States v. Ellison (likely Caroline Ellison), and United States v. Coccagna, providing case numbers, ECF filings, and dates, and notes the non-binding nature of these agreements on other federal, state, local, or foreign authorities.
This document, labeled as page 8 of a larger filing (DOJ-OGR-00000208), discusses how the Department of Justice drafts plea agreements with a limited, single-district scope, meaning they typically only bind specific U.S. Attorney's Offices and not the entire Department or other authorities. It provides three examples of such plea agreement language from the Middle District of Alabama, Northern District of Alabama, and Eastern District of California, citing specific court cases and ECF filing numbers with dates in 2023 and 2024.
This document is an FBI Receipt for Property (Form FD-597, Rev 8-11-94) dated March 17, 2014, indicating that property was received. The file number is 316-mm-108062, and a diagonal handwritten note states 'No further information' across the item description section.
This document is an FBI property receipt (Form FD-597) dated March 17, 2011. It records the receipt of 20 photographs under file number 31E-MM-108062, indicating they were 'Received From' an unspecified source. The document contains standard FBI form fields and a 'NOTHING FOLLOWS' notation.
This is page 2 of a legal filing dated August 8, 2025, from the US Department of Justice to Judges Berman and Engelmayer. The document confirms the Government is submitting Epstein grand jury transcripts under seal to Judge Berman, identifying which parts are publicly available, following a similar procedure used for Ghislaine Maxwell's transcripts submitted four days prior. The filing is signed by US Attorney General Pamela Bondi, Deputy AG Todd Blanche, and US Attorney for SDNY Jay Clayton.
This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a submission from the U.S. Government to judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The government discusses legal precedents for grand jury secrecy, notes that Epstein's death is a relevant factor, and details its ongoing efforts to notify all victims before the information is released. The filing is submitted by U.S. Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi, Deputy AG Todd Blanche, and U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.
This document is the final signature page (page 10 of 10) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the case number historically associated with United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document is dated July 29, 2025, and is signed by Pamela J. Bondi as U.S. Attorney General, Todd Blanche as Deputy AG, and Jay Clayton as U.S. Attorney for the SDNY. The text argues that proposed redactions are necessary to protect victim-related information.
This is the cover page of a Government Memorandum filed on July 29, 2025, in the Southern District of New York. It addresses two cases: USA v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490) and USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The document lists Pamela J. Bondi as Attorney General, Todd Blanche as Deputy AG, and Jay Clayton as US Attorney for SDNY.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell is being subjected to abusive and inhumane conditions by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The filing claims this treatment is retribution for Jeffrey Epstein's death while in BOP custody. To support the claim of agency incompetence, it quotes District Judge Colleen McMahon from a separate case criticizing the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Prisons.
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 15, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP is requesting to withdraw as counsel of record for Ghislaine Maxwell because she has retained new counsel, David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC, for her appeal. The motion is unopposed by the United States, represented by AUSA Maurene Comey.
This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding motions to unseal grand jury transcripts. The government discusses legal precedents for maintaining grand jury secrecy and updates the court on its progress in notifying victims, particularly those related to the 'Maxwell and Epstein matters'. The government commits to continuing its efforts to contact all relevant victims and to protect the interests of all third parties involved.
This document is the final page of a legal filing from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, dated July 29, 2025. It is submitted by attorneys from the U.S. Department of Justice, including Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi and signed by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton, concluding an argument that redactions are necessary to protect victim-related information.
This is the cover page of a government memorandum filed on July 29, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document addresses cases against both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and is filed in response to court orders from July 22, 2025. Notably, it lists Pamela J. Bondi as U.S. Attorney General, Todd Blanche as Deputy U.S. Attorney General, and Jay Clayton as U.S. Attorney for the SDNY.
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding where an unnamed speaker argues for the court's supervision of an investigation into components of the Department of Justice. The speaker highlights the 'dreadful' and 'disgraceful' conditions of the local jail where Jeffrey Epstein was held, claiming they are worse than at Guantanamo. The core argument is that court oversight is necessary to maintain public confidence in the justice system and to uncover the truth about the situation.
This is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Supreme Court of the United States for case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States. On May 9, 2025, Rina Danielson served a 'Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner' upon the attorneys for both parties (David Oscar Markus and Solicitor General D. John Sauer) via mail. The document is stamped with DOJ bates number DOJ-OGR-00000215.
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 4, 2021, and March 1, 2021. It details various legal maneuvers, including Maxwell's third motion for bond, motions for a bill of particulars, and disputes regarding her confinement conditions at the MDC. The docket also records correspondence between the defense (Cohen, Sternheim, Everdell) and the prosecution (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, as well as the sealing of multiple documents.
This document is page 'iv' (page 5 of the PDF) from a legal filing dated December 14, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It serves as a Table of Authorities, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (relating to release or detention of a defendant pending trial) and Rule 5(F) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The page bears a Department of Justice discovery stamp (DOJ-OGR-00001977).
This document is a Court Order filed on June 9, 2020, in the case against correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. It outlines the charges against Thomas for falsifying inmate count slips at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on the night Jeffrey Epstein died (August 9-10, 2019). The order addresses Thomas's motion to compel the government to produce Inspector General reports and other evidence prior to the trial scheduled for January 2021.
This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2014, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The case, docket number 13-1388-cr, is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America, originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The page identifies the parties involved, their legal roles (Appellee, Defendants, Defendant-Appellant), and their respective legal counsel.
This document is a service list page from a court filing dated January 12, 2021, associated with Case 21-58 and referencing criminal case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists four Assistant U.S. Attorneys (Moe, Rossmiller, Comey, and Rohrbach) who received electronic notification of the filing via their Department of Justice email addresses. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00019717.
This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2022, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for case number 13-1388-cr. The case is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America. The document identifies the parties involved and lists the legal counsel for both the government (Appellee) and the appellant David Parse.
This document is the final page (page 14) of a legal letter dated March 7, 2013, sent by attorney Paul Shechtman of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III. The text concludes an argument regarding sentencing, specifically utilizing a footnote citing 'Gall v. United States' to argue that non-incarcerative (probationary) sentences still constitute a significant restriction of liberty. The document was originally filed in 2013 but was later submitted as Exhibit A-5943 in the 2022 Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN).
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the Court concerning her client, Ms. Maxwell. Sternheim complains about the recurring problematic conditions, over-management, and hyper-surveillance Ms. Maxwell faces at the MDC, arguing it impedes trial preparation and violates attorney-client privilege. The letter supports its claims by quoting Judge McMahon from another case, who strongly condemned the "disgusting, inhuman" conditions at the MCC and MDC and blamed the incompetence of the Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons.
This document is page 27 of a jury questionnaire (Document 367) filed on October 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains questions 26 through 28, asking potential jurors to disclose any bias against federal law enforcement (DOJ, FBI), the NYPD, or U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, as well as general opinions on prosecutors and defense attorneys.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity