USA
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Maurene Ryan Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Alison Gainfort Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor government |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Employment representation |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Prosecutor government |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alex Rossmiller
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employment representation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-19 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order granting in part and denying in part the Defendant's motio... | Court | View |
| 2021-11-19 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a Memorandum Opinion & Order regarding the testimony of Witness-3 (... | Court | View |
| 2021-11-19 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order regarding Government Exhibit 52, ordering the Government t... | Court | View |
| 2021-11-19 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order regarding the Government's motion to quash a subpoena, ord... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-14 | N/A | Deadline for parties to submit lists referenced in the pseudonym logistics letter. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-11-12 | Legal filing | Filing of a Memorandum in Opposition by the USA and a Reply to Response by Ghislaine Maxwell, bot... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-11-12 | Court filing | Multiple motions in limine, a response to a motion, and a reply memorandum were filed and entered... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-12 | Court filing | Multiple motions in limine, a response, a reply memorandum, and memo endorsements were filed and ... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-10 | Order | The Court revised the schedule for supplemental briefing on Defendant's first and seventh motions... | Courtroom 518 of the United... | View |
| 2021-11-08 | N/A | Motion Filed (Dkt 424) | Court | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Court Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Legal filing | Multiple motions in limine, a response, a reply memorandum, and a letter were filed by both the U... | SDNY CM/ECF | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | RESPONSE in Opposition by USA (Doc 397) to multiple motions filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-11 | N/A | Deadline for Government to disclose unnamed co-conspirator identities and statements. | Court | View |
| 2021-09-03 | N/A | Order to Disclose Co-Conspirators | Court | View |
| 2021-06-02 | N/A | Court Order setting disclosure schedule | Court | View |
| 2021-04-21 | N/A | Order regarding redactions and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. | Court | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Memo Endorsement granting in part and denying in part the Government's request for extension. | Court | View |
| 2021-04-16 | N/A | Filing of Government Memorandum in Opposition to defense motions. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-03-29 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered certain information in the Government's brief unredacted and requi... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-29 | Court filing | An (S2) Superseding Indictment was filed against Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered that redactions on a March 26 letter from Boies Schiller Flexner L... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-24 | Court filing / appeal record transmission | Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files... | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 2021-03-18 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order regarding redactions and sealing of documents. The order g... | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-18 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a detailed order regarding redactions and sealing of documents, gra... | Court | View |
EFTA00020769.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2019 between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Assistant U.S. Attorney's office and technical support staff regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case (USAO # 2018R01618). The correspondence details the process of loading subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (referred to as BSF) into the Relativity e-discovery database. The emails specifically reference file paths containing video interviews with individuals identified only by initials (H.R., J.H., S.V., A.D., A.T.) and discuss the technical handling of DVD file structures.
EFTA00017769.pdf
This document contains a series of emails between February and July 2020 involving Jill Greenfield (Fieldfisher) and Assistant US Attorneys from the Southern District of New York regarding the potential interview of a witness/victim in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses the logistics of meeting in London versus the US, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel, and specific legal conditions such as anonymity, the presence of support persons, and the scope of questioning. Crucially, it reveals the client was employed by Ghislaine Maxwell and has filed a complaint with the Met Police regarding sexual assault by Epstein in London.
EFTA00016299.pdf
This document is an email dated December 4, 2018, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email shares a network file path concerning FOIA documents related to the investigation 'USvEpstein-2018R01618', indicating active internal handling of Epstein-related files and FBI FOIA requests at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00000218.tif
This document lists contact information for two law firms, Kropf Moseley Schmitt PLLC and Markus/Moss PLLC, and their respective attorneys, Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus, under a case reference '24-1073 MAXWELL, GHISLAINE USA'. It appears to be a record of legal counsel contact details relevant to Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00030188.tif
This document is a DHL shipping label indicating a package sent to the FBI at 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, USA. The shipment, weighing 2 lbs and containing 1 piece, was dispatched on February 5, 2007, with a service type of GDS THU and tracking number 45603437972. It also contains various internal codes and redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00029333.tif
This document appears to be a screenshot or printout of a Google Maps search interface, dated June 11, 2007. It shows the Google logo, input fields for 'Google Maps' and 'Address', and includes URL parameters indicating a search for 'USA'. The document also contains classification markings and redaction codes.
DOJ-OGR-00029326.tif
This document appears to be a screenshot or printout from Google Maps, dated May 13, 2008, and is page 1 of 2. It contains standard Google Maps branding, an 'Address' input field, and some redaction codes (b6-8, b7c-8) along with a document number (DOJ-OGR-00029326).
DOJ-OGR-00028704.jpg
This is a heavily redacted IO95 Inspection Comments form from April 28, 2014. The document notes the subject's city of birth as New York, country of birth as USA, and indicates 'NO CHANGE OF ADDRESS'. The extensive redactions, citing exemptions like (b)(7)(E), obscure the identity of the individual and other specific details of the inspection.
DOJ-OGR-00028647.jpg
This is an IO25 Inspection Remarks document from the Department of Justice, dated April 28, 2014. The document records an inspection of an individual whose city of birth is New York and country of birth is the USA. Most other details, including comments, inspection results, and identifying information, are redacted under FOIA exemptions related to law enforcement records and personal privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00015623.jpg
This document is a U.S. government evidence photograph, Exhibit 294 from case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image displays an open cardboard box containing two packaged products labeled "Twin Torpedos." The surrounding area includes a Kmart shopping bag, a pair of sneakers, and a small piece of paper that appears to be a receipt.
DOJ-OGR-00000855.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from Case 21-770, detailing events between December 10 and December 18, 2020, concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily revolve around the filing of a court transcript, Maxwell's renewed application for bail, and the court's orders regarding the redaction of documents related to the bail application. The court, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan, approved Maxwell's proposed redactions to protect the privacy of individuals mentioned, balancing it against the public's right to access.
DOJ-OGR-00000241.jpg
This document is a contact sheet related to case number 24-1073 for Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the contact information for two attorneys: Sara Kropf of Kropf Moseley Schmitt PLLC in Washington, D.C., and David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC in Miami, FL. The document indicates it was transmitted via email.
DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00015686.jpg
This document is a photograph designated as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 51-C' for a legal case. The image displays the interior of a wooden product featuring a sticker from the manufacturer, 'EARTHLITE', indicating it was made in Vista, California, USA. A separate notice label states that the product's materials comply with flammability requirements set by the California Bureau of Home Furnishings.
DOJ-OGR-00015684.jpg
This document is a government evidence photograph, Exhibit 51-A, from case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). It displays the underside of a portable massage table, identified as an Earthlite 'Spirit' model, which was manufactured in Vista, California on April 27, 2000. The image is cataloged by the Department of Justice with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00015684.
DOJ-OGR-00015595.jpg
This document is a photograph designated as Government Exhibit 257 from the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image displays the contents of an open desk drawer, which prominently features an Adams brand "Important Message Book." The presence of this message book suggests it may contain information relevant to the legal proceedings for which this photograph was taken as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00015470.jpg
This document is the cover of an 'Adams' brand phone message pad, model SC1184D, copyrighted in 1998. The cover has been marked as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 2-A' for a legal case, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). It also bears a Department of Justice document control number, DOJ-OGR-00015470.
DOJ-OGR-00015212.jpg
This document is the first page of the Curriculum Vitae for Elizabeth F. Loftus, a Distinguished Professor at UC Irvine. It outlines her education, teaching experience, and honorary degrees. The document is stamped as a Defendant's Exhibit (EL-1) for the case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), which corresponds to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating Loftus was utilized as an expert witness for the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00002225.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal opinion by French lawyer William Julié filed in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). Julié argues that French law does not absolutely prohibit the extradition of nationals and cites a past letter from Senators Durbin and Obama to support the interpretation that France has discretion to extradite. He concludes it is unlikely the French government would refuse to extradite Maxwell, especially given the 2010 EU-US extradition agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00002225(1).jpg
This document is the final page of a legal opinion by French lawyer William Julié filed in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). Julié argues that French law does not absolutely prohibit the extradition of nationals and cites a past letter from Senators Durbin and Obama to support the interpretation that France has discretion to extradite. He concludes it is unlikely the French government would refuse to extradite Maxwell, especially given the 2010 EU-US extradition agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00002224(1).jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed on December 23, 2020, by French lawyer William Julié regarding the extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell. Julié argues that the US-France Extradition Treaty allows France discretion to extradite its own citizens, countering the DOJ's reliance on the 2007 'Peterson case' precedent. The text analyzes the Peterson case, noting it was a discretionary decision by the Ministry of Justice rather than a court ruling, and references a 2007 letter from Senators Obama and Durbin regarding that matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002223(1).jpg
This legal document, authored by French lawyer William Julié on December 18, 2020, is a response to a US government memorandum concerning a defendant's release. Julié argues that the US government's reliance on a letter from the French Minister of Justice is misplaced, as it selectively quotes French law while ignoring the supremacy of international extradition treaties under the French Constitution. The core argument is that the extradition treaty between the USA and France should govern the case, not the specific article of the French criminal code cited by the Minister.
DOJ-OGR-00002147.jpg
This legal analysis, authored by William Julié, discusses the factors making it highly likely that the French government would extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the United States. It considers the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, Ms Maxwell's dual American and French nationalities, her ties to the USA, and the unlikelihood of France prosecuting her for crimes committed in the USA, especially if she fled France in violation of bail.
DOJ-OGR-00002146.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion filed on December 14, 2020, by French attorney William Julié in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that French Constitutional law and the 1996 Extradition Treaty with the US do not strictly prohibit the extradition of French nationals, asserting that it is ultimately an executive decision. The author concludes that if Maxwell were to flee to France, the French Investigating Chamber would not be legally bound to block her extradition to the United States.
DOJ-OGR-00002144.jpg
This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié, analyzes the legal framework surrounding the extradition of a country's own nationals, with a specific focus on France and its treaty with the USA. It contrasts different legal approaches under international law, noting that some countries constitutionally prohibit extraditing citizens while others, particularly common law jurisdictions, permit it. The document also examines European law, including the European Convention on Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant, which has different rules for member states.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity