| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Maurene Ryan Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Alison Gainfort Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor government |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Employment representation |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Prosecutor government |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alex Rossmiller
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employment representation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Implementation of U.S. Tariffs on China on various goods (food, electronics, materials) | Global/International Trade | View |
| N/A | N/A | US retreat from the Middle East region. | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Historical reference to a time when the USA had a narrow set of interests and acted prudently. | Global | View |
| N/A | Trial | The upcoming trial for the case USA v. Maxwell, case number 1:20-cr-00330. | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Camp David Summit failure | Camp David | View |
| 2025-11-21 | N/A | U.S. and China agree to pause trade war | Unknown | View |
| 2022-07-12 | Court filing | Multiple letters and motions (Docs 713-725) were entered into the court record for Case 22-1426. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-07-12 | N/A | Multiple docket entries (700-711) entered into the court system, likely unsealing or logging past... | SDNY | View |
| 2022-07-08 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 1-2 in Case 22-1426, which identifies the parties and their legal representation. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | The case USA v. Maxwell was terminated. | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | N/A | Deadline for Government to confer with MDC Warden and update the Court. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Sentencing Submission filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | USA filed a MEMORANDUM in Opposition to the motion for a new trial. | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | USA files Memorandum in Opposition to Maxwell's Motion for New Trial | SDNY | View |
| 2022-01-13 | N/A | Deadline for parties to submit proposed redactions | Court | View |
| 2021-12-14 | N/A | Order issued for Government to respond to Defense letter regarding anticipated witnesses (deadlin... | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Scheduled date for opening statements. | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | Trial | The trial in the case is scheduled to commence. | Courtroom 318, Thurgood Mar... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Scheduled Opening Statements (Future Event mentioned) | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | Trial | The trial in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled to commence. | Courtroom 318, Thurgood Mar... | View |
| 2021-11-24 | Court filing | USA filed a motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ryan Hall. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-11-24 | Court filing | Ghislaine Maxwell filed a response to the USA's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ry... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-11-24 | Court filing | USA filed a letter regarding a proposed protective order. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-11-24 | Court filing | Multiple documents were filed with the court, including letters, motions, and orders related to p... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-23 | N/A | Conference held (subject of the transcript) | Court | View |
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Document 97-22) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, authored by French attorney William Julié. It provides a legal analysis of the Extradition Treaty between France and the USA, arguing that unlike other treaties (such as the European Convention on Extradition), the US-France treaty does not explicitly prohibit the extradition of French nationals. It contrasts this with treaties France holds with countries like Morocco and China, and compares it favorably to the treaty with Canada.
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney William Julié regarding the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from France to the USA. The filing argues that under the US-France Extradition Treaty, a claim of political motivation is unlikely to succeed in preventing her extradition, citing a history of French courts granting US requests and distinguishing her case from a past instance where extradition to Russia was denied on political grounds.
This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié, analyzes the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell in the context of French law for an extradition request. The document argues that the alleged conduct would qualify as the crime of 'proxénétisme' (procuring) under the French Criminal Code, with enhanced penalties because it involved a minor. The author concludes that the principle of dual criminality would not be an obstacle to Maxwell's extradition from France to the USA.
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) by attorney William Julié, filed on December 14, 2020. It states a key procedural requirement from the 1996 US-France Extradition Treaty, specifying that a person subject to an extradition decree must be handed over within one month of notification.
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, by attorney William Julié, outlines the fourth stage of the French extradition process. It details the procedure when a requested person consents to extradition, referencing specific articles of the French Code of Criminal Procedure and international agreements, such as the extradition treaty between the EU and the USA. The document explains how consent allows for a simplified and expedited surrender, including a potential waiver of the rule of specialty.
This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Authored by French attorney William Julié, it outlines the procedures of the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, specifically detailing the 60-day limit for formal extradition requests following an arrest and the 'Ministerial phase' of the application process. It explains that if documents are not received within 60 days, the detained person is discharged, though they may be re-arrested later.
This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié and filed on December 14, 2020, provides a background on the bail hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell held on July 14, 2020. It highlights the US Government's argument and the Court's decision to deny bail, both of which centered on Maxwell's French citizenship and France's policy of not extraditing its nationals, which established her as a flight risk. The report's stated purpose is to legally evaluate the validity of the claim that France does not extradite its citizens.
This legal document, authored by French attorney William Julié, provides an analysis of the potential extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell from the USA to France. Julié argues that despite her French citizenship, French authorities would likely grant an extradition request because the US-France extradition treaty does not prohibit extraditing nationals. He further states that factors like her US citizenship, a signed waiver, and the obligation for France to try her if extradition is denied, make her return to the USA highly probable, especially in a scenario where she had fled in violation of bail.
This document is page 7 (filed as page 8 of 10) of a financial analysis report filed in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details a review of Maxwell's domestic and foreign bank accounts and Limited Liability Corporations (LLCs), noting that many accounts were closed prior to the relevant time period or held immaterial sums. The report mentions Maxwell's spouse in the context of beneficiary status for trusts and LLCs, and concludes that her personal expenditures appear consistent with her reported annual income, though specific entity names are heavily redacted.
This is a Juvenile Referral Report from the Palm Beach Police Department for the arrest of Haley Robson. Robson, born April 9, 1986, was arrested at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL, for the felony charge of 'Lewd & Lascivious Act w/ 16 yoa'. The arresting officer is identified as Det. Joe Recarley.
This document appears to be a page from an address book or contact list belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains a handwritten entry for 'Richard Snyder' (partially obscured) listing a home phone number with a 212 area code and a cell number with a 917 area code, both associated with New York City.
This is an arrest report from the Palm Beach Police Department for Jeffrey E. Epstein. The report details two felony charges: four counts of 'Unlawful Sex Acts w/Minor' under statute 794.05(1) and one count of 'Lewd/Lascivious Molest' under statute 800.04(5). The document includes Epstein's personal information, multiple addresses in Florida and New York, and identifies Det. Joe Recarey as the arresting officer.
This document is a legal opinion filed in December 2020 (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case), authored by French lawyer William Julié. It argues that French law does not absolutely prohibit the extradition of its nationals to the US, citing the 'Peterson case' and a 2010 EU-US agreement. The document specifically references Ghislaine Maxwell, concluding it is unlikely France would refuse to extradite her, and quotes a past letter from Senators Durbin and Obama supporting discretionary extradition.
This document is a page from a legal opinion by French lawyer William Julié, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It analyzes the extradition treaty between France and the USA, arguing that France has the discretion to extradite its own citizens. The text specifically rebuts a DOJ argument based on the 2007 'Hans Peterson' case (involving Senators Obama and Durbin), stating that the Peterson outcome was a discretionary ministerial decision rather than a binding judicial precedent.
This legal document summarizes expert opinions regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's potential extradition. Mr. Perry, an expert on UK law, concludes that Maxwell is unlikely to successfully resist extradition to the United States or be granted bail. William Julié, an expert on French law, clarifies that, contrary to government representations, the extradition of a French national to the USA is legally permissible.
This document is page 14 of a legal filing by attorney William Julié in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 23, 2021. The filing argues against an extradition request by citing the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. It specifically quotes articles that protect nationals from extradition, emphasizing that nationality should be assessed at the time of the alleged offense.
This document, authored by Benjamin Harnwell of the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, outlines the objectives of Steve Bannon's organization, 'The Movement,' in the lead-up to the Spring 2019 European elections. It details Bannon's intent to create a populist right-wing alliance to rival George Soros's influence, citing connections to European leaders like Orbán, Le Pen, and Farage, as well as his past involvement with Cambridge Analytica and Donald Trump. The text also notes Bannon's strained relationship with Trump following the publication of 'Fire and Fury' and his shift in focus toward influencing European politics.
This document is an email chain involving Steve Bannon and Benjamin Harnwell (Dignitatis Humanae Institute). Bannon asks Harnwell to translate or explain a text that discusses Bannon's political activities in Europe, his 'The Movement' organization, his strained relationship with Donald Trump, and his connections to European nationalist figures like Nigel Farage and Marine Le Pen. The text characterizes Bannon's shift toward European politics as a 'reign in Hell' strategy following his fallout with the Trump administration.
This document analyzes the political ambitions of Steve Bannon to create a 'populist international' in Europe, detailing his past activities with Cambridge Analytica and his connections with various right-wing political figures. It describes Bannon's intention to establish an extreme right-wing think tank and his efforts to influence European politics, projecting a fully operational 'Movement' by 2019. The document also includes contact information for Benjamin Harnwell of the Dignitatis Humanae Institute.
This document contains an email exchange between Steve Bannon and Benjamin Harnwell from July 22, 2018. Bannon asks Harnwell to translate or explain a text, which Harnwell provides; the text discusses Bannon's political activities in Europe, his connections to right-wing figures like Orbán and Farage, the launch of 'The Movement,' and his strained relationship with Donald Trump following the release of 'Fire and Fury.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a text excerpt or memo sent by Benjamin Harnwell of the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, found within House Oversight Committee records. It details the strategies of Steve Bannon's organization, 'The Movement,' aiming to unite right-wing populist parties across Europe (including Lega, 5 Stars, and leaders like Orbán and Le Pen) ahead of the 2019 European Parliament elections. It references Bannon's past with Cambridge Analytica, his strained relationship with Donald Trump following the publication of 'Fire and Fury,' and his intention to focus efforts on Europe.
This document is an email chain from July 2018 involving Steve Bannon, Benjamin Harnwell, and Alexandra Preate. It contains a forwarded text (likely a translated article or draft) discussing Bannon's political activities in Europe with 'The Movement,' his connections to Nigel Farage and Matteo Salvini's Lega, and his strained relationship with Donald Trump. Bannon asks the recipient, presumably Harnwell, to explain the text ('What does this say???').
This document is a page from a glossary or terminology guide, likely excerpted from a book or educational article, defining terms related to feminism, queer studies, and BDSM. It includes definitions for terms such as 'blaming the victim,' 'dungeon,' 'enthusiastic consent,' and 'landmine.' The page bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018700,' indicating it was produced as evidence in a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document appears to be the final page or a discussion guide section of an ebook distributed via Smashwords. It contains discussion questions regarding identity and binaries, followed by an 'About The Author' biography for Clarisse Thorn, a sex-positive educator and writer. The document includes a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (018684), suggesting it was included in a larger document production, though the text itself does not directly mention Epstein.
This document appears to be a page from an essay or book (specifically mentioning 'Confessions of a Pickup Artist Chaser') included in House Oversight Committee evidence (Bates labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018668). The text analyzes the 'Pickup Artist' (PUA) community from a feminist perspective, discussing the intersection of self-help, misogyny, and social anxiety. The author also discusses the stigma surrounding BDSM within feminist circles, referencing Neil Strauss and Alice Schwarzer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity