United States District Court FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Murray
|
Professional court reporter |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | The district court issued a judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019614.jpg
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States of America in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). The brief's preliminary statement outlines that Maxwell is appealing a September 2, 2020 order from the Southern District of New York which denied her motion to modify a protective order. It also summarizes the superseding indictment filed on July 8, 2020, which charges Maxwell with assisting Jeffrey Epstein in the sexual exploitation of minors between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00019592.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing from September 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061) before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to dismiss her appeal, submitted by her attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. The appeal originates from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019586.jpg
This is a court filing from September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). Ghislaine Maxwell, through her attorneys Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., submits an unopposed motion to file three specific documents under seal: her unredacted opening brief, Appendix Volume 2, and an unredacted response to a government opposition motion. The document originates from an appeal of the case in the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019514.jpg
This document is the signature page for a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 27, 2020. It is ordered by Judge Alison J. Nathan and shows the agreement and consent of both the prosecution, led by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, and the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by her legal counsel. The specific nature of the order is not detailed on this page.
DOJ-OGR-00019487.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal indictment filed on July 8, 2020, detailing Count Six (Perjury) against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that during a deposition on July 22, 2016, Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony by denying any knowledge of sex toys or devices at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house or in his possession. The document quotes the specific questions and her negative responses that form the basis of the perjury charge.
DOJ-OGR-00019486.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically outlining Count Five for Perjury. It alleges that on April 22, 2016, Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony during a deposition when she denied knowledge of a scheme by Jeffrey Epstein to recruit underage girls. The indictment also references prior allegations that Maxwell arranged for the transportation of 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019400.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief filed on September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). It appeals a decision from the Southern District of New York (Case 20-CR-330) involving the United States of America. The document lists her legal representation as Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00019220.jpg
This document is page 17 of a federal indictment filed on July 2, 2020, detailing 'Count Six' (Perjury) against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that on July 22, 2016, during a deposition for civil case 15 Civ. 7344 in the SDNY, Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony regarding her knowledge of sex toys at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house and her interactions with minors.
DOJ-OGR-00019219.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020. It outlines Count Five (Perjury), alleging that on April 22, 2016, Maxwell lied under oath during a deposition by denying knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's scheme to recruit underage girls. The document also references Maxwell's alleged role in transporting 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019204.jpg
This document is an arrest warrant for Ghislaine Maxwell, issued on June 29, 2020, by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The warrant, signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith, commands law enforcement to arrest Maxwell based on an indictment for multiple offenses, including conspiracy to entice minors, enticement of a minor, and perjury. The case is identified as 20 CR 330.
DOJ-OGR-00019190.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal indictment filed on July 2, 2020, detailing Count Six (Perjury) against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that on July 22, 2016, Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony during a deposition for a civil case in the Southern District of New York. The indictment quotes her testimony where she denied knowledge of sex toys or devices at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house.
DOJ-OGR-00019189.jpg
This document is page 16 of an indictment, filed on July 2, 2020, detailing charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes a charge of perjury (Count Five), stemming from her alleged false testimony during an April 22, 2016, deposition in a civil case where she denied knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages. The document also refers to Maxwell's role in transporting Minor Victim-1 from Florida to New York for sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019174.jpg
This document is an arrest warrant for Ghislaine Maxwell, issued on June 29, 2020, by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The warrant, signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith, commands law enforcement to arrest Maxwell based on an indictment for multiple federal offenses, including conspiracy to entice minors, enticement of a minor, conspiracy to transport minors, transportation of a minor, and perjury. The case is identified as 20 CR 330.
DOJ-OGR-00013278.jpg
This is a legal notice filed on August 10, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). The document announces that an official transcript of a conference held on December 7, 2021, has been filed by the court reporter. It also informs the parties of their right to request redactions of personal data from the transcript within seven days of this notice.
DOJ-OGR-00013013.jpg
This is a court document filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). It serves as a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript regarding a conference held on December 6, 2021. The notice outlines the deadlines and procedures for parties to request redactions of sensitive personal data from the transcript before it becomes publicly available.
DOJ-OGR-00009224.jpg
This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2014, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The case, docket number 13-1388-cr, is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America, originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The page identifies the parties involved, their legal roles (Appellee, Defendants, Defendant-Appellant), and their respective legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00009152.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a court filing by the U.S. Government, likely a motion or memorandum. It cites various legal precedents to establish the standards for conducting a post-verdict inquiry into potential juror misconduct. The Government argues that these standards have been met with respect to 'Juror 50' due to an inconsistency between his public statements about being a victim of sexual abuse and his answer on a juror questionnaire, and therefore consents to a hearing to determine if the juror lied.
DOJ-OGR-00009108.jpg
This document is the title page of an Amicus Curiae Brief filed on February 24, 2022, by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-CR-330) in the Southern District of New York. The filing attorneys listed are Abbe David Lowell and Christopher D. Man of Winston & Strawn LLP, and Joel B. Rudin of the Law Offices of Joel B. Rudin, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00019860.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to the Motion for Pretrial Release', dated April 1, 2021. The filing is part of an appeal (No. 21-770 & 21-58) in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, originating from a case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are the United States of America (Appellee) and Ghislaine Maxwell (Appellant), who is represented by attorney David Oscar Markus of MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
DOJ-OGR-00019689.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a court order dated November 9, 2020, regarding Case 20-3061. The court denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate her appeal with 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' and dismissed her appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The text largely focuses on legal precedents regarding the 'final judgment rule' and the strict limitations on interlocutory appeals in criminal cases.
DOJ-OGR-00019684.jpg
This is page 2 of a court order from an appellate court dismissing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction and denying her motion to consolidate. The document outlines the legal basis for the dismissal, citing the "final judgment rule" in criminal cases and the strict conditions required for collateral order appeals.
DOJ-OGR-00019678.jpg
This document is page 2 of an appellate court order dated October 19, 2020, dismissing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction and denying her motion to consolidate her criminal appeal with the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The court outlines the 'final judgment rule,' explaining that appeals generally cannot occur until after a final conviction and sentencing, and determines Maxwell's request does not meet the strict criteria for an exception (collateral order). The document cites numerous legal precedents regarding jurisdiction and finality in criminal cases.
DOJ-OGR-00019671.jpg
This is a legal motion filed on October 8, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., requests permission to file an unredacted reply brief under seal. The motion is part of an appeal concerning a lower court order by Judge Nathan which denied a request to modify a criminal protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00019647.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply Brief', submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on October 8, 2020. The brief is part of an appeal (Case 20-3061) from a lower court case (20-CR-330) in the Southern District of New York, where the United States of America is the plaintiff against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is represented by attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based law firm HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00019608.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal brief filed by the United States of America on October 2, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The case is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061) from a decision in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The brief lists the government's legal counsel, including Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz, who is set to argue the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity